© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Thematic content - 1. class

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Nilai rata-rata total validitas

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

Table 7. Clinical Practice

Table 2. Levels of youth Involvement in Community Development Programs

Table 3. Shared Governance

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Appendix A Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ)

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 5. Organizational Procedures

Table 9. The proposed administrative procedures

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Students` responses

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 4. Digital Media Project (DMP) contribution to skill development (%) SA A D SD I believe the DMP helped me to understand the topic 41 39 18 2 The DMP helped me to develop critical thinking skills 46 32 19 3 The DMP helped me to develop communication skills 47 9 The DMP helped me to work as a part of a team 37 54 8 1 The DMP helped me to exercise my creativity 7 I believe I learned additional skills by doing this assignment 35 21 5 SA = Strongly Agree, A = Agree, D = Disagree, SD = Strongly Disagree. Jorge Reyna et al. Implementing Digital Media Presentations as Assessment Tools for Pharmacology Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 14, 983-991. doi:10.12691/education-4-14-1 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.