Metabolomics study of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Advertisements

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
A wolf in sheep's clothing
Surgery for congenital diseases of the aorta
A novel detection method of non–small cell lung cancer using multiplexed bead-based serum biomarker profiling  Hyun Joo Lee, MD, PhD, Young Tae Kim, MD,
Expanding options to manage traumatic thoracic vascular injuries
A novel biomarker for the detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma
Ground glass opacity of the lung: The veil that needs lifting
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD 
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Multilevel data analysis: What? Why? How?
How should we treat air leaks?
Go on-pump or off-pump in diabetic patients?
Bigger The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Commentary: Pursuit of the green jacket: Mastery of the long and short games  Daniel P. Raymond, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Esophagectomy versus endoscopic resection for patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma: Mercedes versus Tesla  Toni Lerut, MD  The Journal of Thoracic.
Surgical economics: MACRA, MIPS, and bundles—Lessons learned in the first 3 years of a coronary artery bypass grafting alternative payment model  Daniel.
Yang Zhang, MD, Haiquan Chen, MD, PhD 
Support Your Specialty
Comparative glycomic profiling in esophageal adenocarcinoma
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Fixing the supply problem
Military surgeons just want to have fun
A first start for lung transplantation?
Commentary: Tag, you're it
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
Yoan Lamarche, MD, Mahsa Elmi-Sarabi, MSc, Lillian Ding, MSc, James G
Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD 
Michael Lanuti, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Niv Ad, MD, Lawrence M. Wei, MD 
Frank C. Spencer, MD, FACS, pioneering cardiothoracic surgeon
Instrumental variable methods in clinical research
Marc Licker, MD, John Diaper, RA 
Internal validation of risk models in lung resection surgery: Bootstrap versus training- and-test sampling  Alessandro Brunelli, MD, Gaetano Rocco, MD 
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications  Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Sutureless valve implantation: Every detail counts
Patients with unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects can undergo the Fontan operation with good outcomes  Sitaram M. Emani, MD  The Journal of Thoracic.
The harder one looks, the more one finds
If airlines can do it, we can too…
First nights, the adrenal axis, and steroids
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Ventricular assistant in restrictive cardiomyopathy: Making the right connection  Robert D.B. Jaquiss, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China
Bicuspid aortopathy: Seeing the forest for the trees
Ralph E. Delius, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Why arch curvature affects arch resistance
External model validation of binary clinical risk prediction models in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery  Graeme L. Hickey, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone,
Apples remain apples NO matter what
Lung cancer randomized controlled trials should compare stereotactic body radiation therapy with observation, NOT surgery  Raja M. Flores, MD  The Journal.
Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind
European Society of Thoracic Surgeons preoperative mediastinal staging guidelines: From face validity to external validity  Alessandro Brunelli, MD  The.
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
Samuel Kim, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
How do we follow up our patients
Journal changes and initiatives
Proceed with caution: The importance of surveillance in patients with pathologic complete response after chemoradiation therapy plus surgery for esophageal.
Calpain inhibitors: The aspirin of the 21st century?
Deciding how much to pay for effective care
Presentation transcript:

Metabolomics study of esophageal adenocarcinoma Jian Zhang, MS, Lingyan Liu, MS, Siwei Wei, MS, G.A. Nagana Gowda, PhD, Zane Hammoud, MD, Kenneth A. Kesler, MD, Daniel Raftery, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages 469-475.e4 (February 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025 Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PLS score plot based on the 1H NMR spectra of normal subjects, BE, HGD and esophageal cancer patients. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 469-475.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Results of the PLS-DA model from the 8 metabolite markers for (A) training group (G1) and (B) test group (G2), and ROC curves using the cross-validated predicted class values for (C) G1 and (D) G2. The AUC of G1 and G2 are 0.875 and 0.888, respectively. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 469-475.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 PLS-DA prediction from the model based on 8 metabolite markers for BE and HGD samples. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 469-475.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Simplified altered metabolism pathways for the most relevant metabolic differences between patients with esophageal cancer and control subjects. The metabolites in gray were the biomarkers observed as being upregulated in patients with esophageal cancer. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 469-475.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Typical 1H NMR CPMG serum spectra from a healthy volunteer and a patient with esophageal cancer (bottom), and their difference spectrum (top). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 469-475.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Box-and-whisker plots of the candidate markers Box-and-whisker plots of the candidate markers. The y-axis represents the relative concentration level of each metabolite normalized by the internal standard TSP. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 469-475.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.025) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions