APR Informational Webinar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Campus Improvement Plans
Grants 101c: Evaluation and Sustainability Provided to constituents as part of a webinar series, developed by the College Board’s Strategy, Outreach and.
Title III National Professional Development (NPD) Program Grantee Performance Reporting: A Webinar for FY2011 and FY2012 Grantees February 28, 2013 Prepared.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Pat Mueller David Merves October 6, 2008 NH RESPONDS Evaluation Component.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
NEW START-UP APPLICATION  Deadline to submit application is October 1 year prior to implementation  If proposal is ed, submit cover page.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
1 SPDG Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
SPDG Performance Measure Discussion Monday, March 14 th 2011.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
SIG Day 2009 Jennifer Doolittle OSEP July 20, 2009.
APR Know-how Jennifer Coffey November 2013 The Revised SPDG Program Measures and Other Reporting Requirements.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Program Measure Review – Considerations for the APR  Jennifer Coffey, PhD, OSEP Program Lead 1 “Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection.”
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Tuesday, March 29 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
Tuesday, April 12 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Gifted & Talented Students Education Program Grant Webinar April 12, 2016.
Dial-in: Pass code: SPDG Grant Management PLC Webinar 524b SPDG Annual Performance Reporting 101: How to efficiently and effectively.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Dial-in: Pass code: SPDG Directors’ Webinar Implementation Driver Series: Organizational – Data Decision Support Systems Facilitators.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Special Review Team Required Actions October 23, 2011
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
“NEXT STEPS” BIE FAMILY ENGAGEMENT <ENTER DATE>
High Quality Coaching: How Do We Know It? April 1, 2015
OSEP TA&D Program Performance Measurement
Welcome to the SPDG Webinar
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Assessment & Evaluation workshop
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
Jennifer Coffey, PhD SPDG Program Lead November 2, 2017
Linden Elementary Title I Parent Night
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
SPDG GPRA/Program Measure Review
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
SPR&I Regional Training
Building Your Title I Schoolwide Plan
Implementing Race to the Top
323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office of Special Education.
Schoolwide Programs.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
Annual Title I Meeting
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Preparing for APR Season
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Harmony School of Excellence-El Paso Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

APR Informational Webinar February 13, 2019 Jennifer Coffey, PhD Program Lead

Today’s Agenda New opportunity Program Measure considerations Overall APR considerations

Sharing EB-PD Worksheets If you would like another SPDG’s feedback on your EB-PD worksheet.. email me (jennifer.coffey@ed.gov) and I will connect you with another State. You can decide timelines and how feedback is to be provided with each other. We can determine best practices for next year.

GPRA Measure – Evidence-based Professional Development Measure 1.1 of 1: Percentage of SPDG-funded initiatives that meet benchmarks for use of evidence-based professional development practices to support the attainment of identified competencies.   

Percentage That Met Target Program Measure 1   Number of Initiatives Percentage That Met Target Year Met Target Did Not Meet Target Total Initiatives 1 2 5 7 71% 3 60% 4 100% 11 6 67% Tot 24 29 83%

Performance assessment Program Measure 1 Initiative Year Selection Training Coaching Performance assessment Support A1 A2 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 Count of 1: 1 3 2 4 Count of 2: 6 9 7 5 10 Count of 3: 18 16 19 15 11 12 Count of 4: 21 8 13 14

Components to Improve B(5) Training: Trainers (the people who trained PD participants) are trained, coached, and observed. C(2) Coaching: SPDG coaches use multiple sources of information in order to provide assistive feedback to those being coached and also provide appropriate instruction or modeling. D(3) Performance Assessment: Implementation fidelity and student outcome data are shared regularly with stakeholders at multiple levels (SEA, regional, local, individual, community, other agencies).

D(4): Goals are created with benchmarks for implementation and student outcome data, and successes are shared and celebrated. D(5): Participants are instructed in how to provide data to the SPDG Project. E(2): Leadership at various education levels (SEA, regional, LEA, school, as appropriate) analyzes feedback regarding barriers and successes and makes the necessary decisions and changes, including revising policies and procedures to alleviate barriers and facilitate implementation

EB-PD Worksheet Findings Need data submission details. Describe changes to policies and procedures to support a new way of work. Describe procedures for analyzing data to recognize barriers. Describe data systems and the alignment of data systems. Need stronger descriptions of roles. Be careful about extraneous info.

Final Thoughts on Program Measure 1 Bullet the elements of the description. It will make your life easier. Take a look at Georgia’s EBPD Worksheet: http://www.signetwork.org/content_pages/205 (top of the page)

GPRA Measure – Improving Implementation Measure 2.1 of 2: The percentage of Special Education State Personnel Grant funded Initiatives that meet benchmarks for improvement in implementation of SPDG-supported practices over time.   

Percentage That Met Target Program Measure 2   Number of Initiatives Percentage That Met Target Year Met Target Did Not Meet Target Total Initiatives 1 2 3 5 60% 4 50% 6 11 55% 33% 7 100% Tot 12 10 22

Considerations Describe 20% being observed by someone external to the site. For next year… are your targets appropriate? Discuss with your Project Officer if your answer is “no”.

Setting Targets Challenging but achievable Analyzing your history and the outcomes other initiatives are experiencing. Set the target for your out-years Work with your Project Officer Targets can be changed

GPRA Measure – Sustaining Implementation Measure 2.2 of 2: The percentage of Special Education State Personnel Grant-funded initiatives that meet targets for the use of funds to sustain SPDG-supported practices.   

Percentage That Met Target Program Measure 3   Number of Initiatives Percentage That Met Target Year Met Target Did Not Meet Target Total Initiatives 1 2 5 7 71% 3 100% 4 10 11 91% 6 Tot 26 29 90%

Overall APR Considerations

Large Available Balances (LAB) You will receive an email if you have a LAB. You will need to complete the financial form and attach it to your APR in G5. Note that the financial form is show for every grantee, but only those who are notified must include it with their APR.

New Cover Sheet Requirement 11. Data Privacy and Security Measures Certification 5 -- Annual and Final Performance Reports: You must check “yes” to indicate that a statement is included in the report to affirm that you are aware of, and in compliance with, all Federal and State laws and regulations regarding system security and the protection of personally identifiable information, supported by a summary of policies and procedures that are in place to ensure compliance, and related attachments.

Directions for #11 Check yes (if true). Write a statement summarizing that the project has followed all State policies and procedures regarding data privacy and handling of personally identifiable information (PII). Attach a link to state policies on data privacy and PII.

Outcome Measures Congressional Justification Telling your story