CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 8 Witnesses— Competency and Perjury.
Advertisements

1 Chapter 7 The Use of Hearsay in the Courtroom. 2 WITNESSES AND THE HEARSAY RULE When witnesses give their testimony, the subject matter is typically.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2012.
Prior Statements By Testifying Witnesses 801(d)(1)
CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Confrontation After Crawford v. Washington Jessica Smith, Institute of Government June, 2004.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE. Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove.
CHAPTER 4, PART 2 OF 2: EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE THAT HEARSAY IS INADMISSIBLE P. JANICKE 2006.
Hearsay Exceptions Declarant Unavailable. Unlike FRE 803, FRE 804 provides exceptions where the Declarant Must be Unavailable to testify.
Confrontation Clause The right to confront and cross exam your accusers.
Trial advocacy workshop
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
EXCLUSIONS FROM HEARSAY Prior Inconsistent Statement, Prior Consistent Statements, Prior Identifications.
A Federal Defender’s Guide to Confrontation Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
Unit 6 The Trial: Players, Motions, Hearings, and Pleas Or I am getting my day in court.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Courts NYC Elder Abuse Training Project.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 4 Seminar Trial options and the Defendants Rights Or I am in trouble, I need a good attorney, fast Who will decide my fate?
Law and Justice Chapter 14 - Trials. Due Process of Law Due Process of Law Due Process of Law Means little to people unless they are arrested Means little.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2011.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2014.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Do now pg.59 1.What are all the steps in a criminal court case?
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Presented by CJS 200 Foundations of the Criminal Justice System
CONFRONTATION ARKANSAS APRIL 2011 MIKE DENTON.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2010.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2016.
Impeachment 证人弹劾.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2012.
Criminal Evidence Marjie Britz Chapter Ten: Hearsay
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
Safeguards for criminal trials
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2016.
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
Legal terms.
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2016.
Character Evidence Rules - In General
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
CHAPTER 4, PART 2 OF 2: EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE THAT HEARSAY IS INADMISSIBLE P. JANICKE 2008.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Yoyo: QUESTION: A man was found dead with a cassette recorder in one hand and a gun in the other. When the police came in, they immediately pressed the.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2015.
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PARTS D-H RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW “UNAVAILABLE” Prof. Janicke 2019.
Alison Chandler Hearsay Exceptions Continued Unavailability Former testimony Dying Declarations Declarations against.
CHAP. 4, part A: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2019.
Hearsay Exceptions - Rules 803 and 804
Presentation transcript:

CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable THOUGHT TO BE WEAKER RULES DRAFTERS (AND COMMON LAW) DEVELOPED A SET OF HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT COULD BE USED ONLY WHEN THE DECLARANT IS UNAVAILABLE AT TRIAL A COMPROMISE BETWEEN OUTRIGHT EXCLUSION AND OUTRIGHT ADMISSIBILITY 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

MEANING OF “UNAVAILABLE” WITHOUT ANY CONNIVANCE BY PROPONENT, DECLARANT IS: NOT FINDABLE REFUSES TO ATTEND REFUSES TO ANSWER EVEN WHEN DIRECTED BY COURT HAS A LOSS OF MEMORY IS DEAD IS INCAPACITATED MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable PROBLEMS/CASES BARBER 4-O 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable FORMER TESTIMONY AT A HEARING OR DEPOSITION IN THIS OR ANOTHER CASE NOW-OPPONENT MUST HAVE HAD OPPORTUNITY AND MOTIVE TO CROSS-EXAMINE DIRECTLY, or THROUGH A PARTY WITH SIMILAR INTEREST (CIVIL CASES ONLY) 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

SOME THINGS THAT WON’T QUALIFY AFFIDAVITS [NOT A HEARING OR DEPOSITION; NO CHANCE TO CROSS-EXAMINE] GRAND JURY TESTIMONY [NO CHANCE TO CROSS-EXAMINE] 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

SOME THINGS THAT WILL QUALIFY NON-PARTY TESTIMONY AT EARLIER TRIAL OF THIS CASE NON-PARTY TESTIMONY AT A DEPOSITION IN THIS OR ANOTHER CASE (WHERE OPPONENT WAS PARTY) NON-PARTY TESTIMONY AT A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING IN THIS CASE 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable NOTE – AN OPPOSING PARTY’S TESTIMONY DOESN’T NEED THIS EXCEPTION IF OFFERED BY THE ADVERSE PARTY, CAN BE OFFERED FREELY, REGARDLESS OF PRIOR OATH OR CROSS-EXAM OPPORTUNITY 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable DYING DECLARATIONS SUPPOSED BASIS: NO ONE WOULD FALSIFY WHILE SOON TO MEET HIS MAKER REQUIREMENTS: HOMICIDE OR CIVIL CASE DECLARANT THOUGHT HE WAS DYING IMMINENTLY (NOT “GOING TO BE SHOT” SOME VAGUE FUTURE TIME) STATEMENT WAS RE. CAUSE OF THE IMPENDING DEATH (i.e., WHODUNIT) 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

EXAMPLES (GIVEN THE PROPER FOUNDATION FACTS) IN A HOMICIDE CASE: “JACK DID IT!!” IN A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION: “BOB SHOT ME IN SELF-DEFENSE” IN A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION: “I NEVER SHOULD HAVE EATEN THOSE OYSTERS” 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

THIRD-PARTY STATEMENTS OF GUILT/FAULT STATEMENT THAT WAS AGAINST DECLARANT’S INTEREST PECUNIARY PENAL MADE BY A NON-PARTY MOST ARE OFFERED BY DEFENDANTS, CIVIL AND CRIMINAL, THROUGH WITNESSES TO DEFLECT BLAME 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

EXAMPLES OF NON-PARTY CONCESSIONS OFFERED BY D, THROUGH WITNESSES: TESTIMONY: “NONPARTY X SAID TO ME: ‘OUR TECHNICIAN WIRED IT WRONG’” NONPARTY X Co.’s DOCUMENT RECALLING X’S AUTOS FOR DEFECTIVE FUEL LINES TESTIMONY: “NONPARTY X SAID: ‘SORRY WE BLEW UP YOUR HOUSE’” 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

RESTRICTION ON NON-PARTY CONCESSIONS WHEN OFFERED TO EXCULPATE A CRIMINAL ACCUSED: MUST HAVE CORROBORATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT “CLEARLY INDICATE ITS TRUSTWORTHINESS” MOST CASES HOLD THEM INADMISSIBLE!! BASED ON A GENERAL MISTRUST OF THE CRIMINAL COMMUNITY 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable PROBLEMS/CASES 4P 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENT RE. FAMILY HISTORY EXAMPLE: TESTIMONY THAT “MY MOTHER TOLD ME I WAS HARRY’S SON” EXAMPLE: TESTIMONY THAT “HER FATHER TOLD ME JEAN WAS BORN IN THE NAVAL HOSPITAL AT NEWPORT” NOTE: RECALL THAT DECLARANT (MOTHER, FATHER) MUST BE UNAVAILABLE 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO HAVE SINCE BEEN “RUBBED OUT” IF THE REMOVER IS A PARTY, THESE ARE NOW ADMISSIBLE AGAINST HIM EXAMPLES: EARLIER 3rd PARTY’S AFFIDAVIT EARLIER 3rd PARTY’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY EARLIER 3rd PARTY’S ORAL REMARK EARLIER 3rd PARTY LETTER 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

ADMISSIBLE HEARSAY DECLARANTS ARE IMPEACHABLE THEY ARE TREATED JUST LIKE WITNESSES TO PREVENT ABUSIVE USE OF EXCEPTIONS SAME RULES OF IMPEACHMENT 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable THE “CATCHALL”: RULE 807 FOR THE “ALMOST” SITUATIONS FOR THE UNPREPARED LAWYER WHO DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO OVERCOME A SUSTAINED HEARSAY OBJECTION FOR THE JUDGE WHO WANTS TO BE BULLETPROOF ON APPEAL 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable REQUIREMENTS: EVIDENCE OF A “MATERIAL FACT” ??? MORE PROBATIVE THAN ANYTHING ELSE REASONABLY AVAILABLE A HAVEN FOR THE UNPREPARED IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable COURT EFFECTIVELY REWRITES THE HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS USUALLY SEEN IN CIVIL CASES [THE BANE OF MY EXISTENCE; THE JUDGE USUALLY SMILES] 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable PROBLEMS/CASES Weaver 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable A PROBLEM WITH SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, WHEN HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS ARE USED BY PROSECUTORS CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON “TESTIMONIAL” TYPE HEARSAY MUST BE KEPT OUT OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, DESPITE RULES 803, 804 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable PROBLEMS/CASES Crawford Davis 2015 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable