Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure-Based Engineering of Angucyclinone 6-Ketoreductases
Advertisements

Mastering the Chemical Language of Bacteria
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
A Strategy for Antagonizing Quorum Sensing
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Biochemical Studies of Mycobacterial Fatty Acid Methyltransferase: A Catalyst for the Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel  Nektaria Petronikolou, Satish K.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
A Strategy for Antagonizing Quorum Sensing
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Frank J. Smith, Victor P.T. Pau, Gino Cingolani, Brad S. Rothberg 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
An Unaltered Orthosteric Site and a Network of Long-Range Allosteric Interactions for PNU in α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors  Christopher B.
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Ins and Outs of Kinase DFG Motifs
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Sanjay B. Hari, Ethan A. Merritt, Dustin J. Maly  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Structure-Based Engineering of Angucyclinone 6-Ketoreductases
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Promiscuous Protein Binding as a Function of Protein Stability
Cristina Esteva-Font, Puay-Wah Phuan, Marc O. Anderson, A.S. Verkman 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B.
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Geetanjali J. Jog, Jun Igarashi, Hiroaki Suga  Chemistry & Biology 
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Molecular Insights into How Ligands Activate or Inactivate LasR
Volume 153, Issue 7, Pages (June 2013)
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Structure-Based Engineering of Angucyclinone 6-Ketoreductases
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1361-1369 (October 2014) Mutational Analysis of the Quorum-Sensing Receptor LasR Reveals Interactions that Govern Activation and Inhibition by Nonlactone Ligands  Joseph P. Gerdt, Christine E. McInnis, Trevor L. Schell, Francis M. Rossi, Helen E. Blackwell  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1361-1369 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.008 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 1361-1369DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2014 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Impact of AHL Head Group on Ligand Activity in LasR (A) Two pairs of ligands that share common acyl tails but have differing heads groups that govern LasR activation or inhibition. (B) View of the OdDHL binding site in the [LasR:OdDHL]2 X-ray crystal structure (Bottomley et al., 2007). Trp60 (highlighted in orange) hydrogen bonds to the lactone head group of OdDHL (cyan). Other residues that hydrogen bond with OdDHL or are part of a hydrogen-bonding network to OdDHL are displayed in gray. Hydrogen bonds are displayed as black dashed lines. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 1361-1369DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 “Janus” Ligand-Protein Behavior (A and B) Differential activation of green-fluorescent protein (GFP) expression by wild-type and W60F LasR in the presence of 10 μM ligands 1 and 3. (C) β-galactosidase reporter assays of wild-type LasR and three mutants with “Janus” behavior. Activation assays were performed by adding ligand at 10 μM, and activity is reporter as Miller units on the positive y-axis. Inhibition assays were performed by adding ligand at 10 μM and OdDHL at its EC50 value for that mutant (see Table S1), and activity is reported on the negative y-axis as the percent decrease in activity relative to only OdDHL being present. Error bars represent SEM of a biological triplicate. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 1361-1369DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Model for Trp60 Governing LasR Activation versus Inhibition (A) Images from automated docking of ligand 1 (magenta) into wild-type and W60F LasR, displaying steric clash between ligand 1 and Trp60 (see orange arrow) that is relieved in the W60F mutant. (B) Image from automated docking of ligands 2 and 3 (orange and green, respectively) into wild-type LasR. Residues Tyr56 and Ser129 are shown hydrogen bonding to the ligand amide carbonyls, and Trp60 is shown hydrogen bonding to the lactone and thiolactone carbonyls with O–H distances of 2.2 Å and 1.8 Å, respectively. (C) Images of X-ray crystal structures of [CviR-CL]2 (Chen et al., 2011) and [LasR-OdDHL]2 (Bottomley et al., 2007). Ligands (cyan) are shown interacting with Trp84 (CviR) and Trp60 (LasR) residues (orange), which are adjacent to residues (green) in an α helix that interacts with a binding partner (gray) in the inactive crossed-domain [CviR-CL]2 structure (left inset). A hypothesized binding partner for LasR is displayed in transparent gray (right). Tyr56 and/or Ser129 homologous residues (blue and red, respectively) interact with the amide carbonyl to position the ligand lactone head near Trp60. Hydrogen bonds are displayed as dashed lines. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 1361-1369DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions