Frank Zimmermann, Factories’03

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Advertisements

Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Beam-beam studies for eRHIC Y. Hao, V.N.Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, V.Ptitsyn.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
Beamstrahlung and energy acceptance K. Ohmi (KEK) HF2014, Beijing Oct 9-12, 2014 Thanks to Y. Zhang and D. Shatilov.
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Elias Métral, CERN Accelerator School, Darmstadt, Germany, October 3rd, 2009 /221 TRANSVERSE INSTABILITIES E. Métral (CERN) Time (20 ns/div)  The purpose.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High Current Beam Physics Group Simulation of space charge and impedance effects Funded through the EU-design study ‘DIRACsecondary.
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Progress on electron cloud studies for HL-LHC A. Axford, G. Iadarola, A. Romano, G. Rumolo Acknowledgments: R. de Maria, R. Tomás HL-LHC WP2 Task Leader.
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
Beam-Beam effects in MeRHIC and eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Jan 10, 2009 EIC Meeting at Stony Brook.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities beam diagnostics and fundamental limitations to the performance.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
A. Z. Ghalam, T. Katsouleas (USC) C. Huang, V. Decyk, W.Mori(UCLA) G. Rumolo and F.Zimmermann(CERN) U C L A 3-D Parallel Simulation Model of Continuous.
Chaos and Emittance growth due to nonlinear interactions in circular accelerators K. Ohmi (KEK) SAD2006 Sep at KEK.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Three examples of application of Sussix 1)Data from simulations  sensitivity 2)Data from measurements  frequency resolution.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Fast Ion Instability Study G. Rumolo and D. Schulte CLIC Workshop 2007, General introduction to the physics of the fast ion instability Fastion.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Motion in an Undulator Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Collision with a crossing angle Large Piwinski angle
Envelope tracking as a tool for low emittance ring design
People who attended the meeting:
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Sven Reiche UCLA ICFA-Workshop - Sardinia 07/02
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
U C L A Electron Cloud Effects on Long-Term Beam Dynamics in a Circular Accelerator By : A. Z. Ghalam, T. Katsouleas(USC) G. Rumolo, F.Zimmermann(CERN)
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Invited talk TOAC001 ( min, 21 slides)
E. Métral, G. Rumolo, R. Tomás (CERN Switzerland), B
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Simulating transition crossing in the PS with HeadTail
Tune Shift Induced by Flat-Chamber Resistive Wall Impedance
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
Beam-beam limit estimated by a quasi-strong-strong simulation
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
CERN-SPS horizontal instability
Some Issues on Beam-Beam Interaction & DA at CEPC
Elena Benedetto, CERN 16/12/08
Presentation transcript:

Frank Zimmermann, Factories’03 Weak-Strong Model for the Combined Effect of Beam-Beam Interaction and Electron Cloud Frank Zimmermann, Factories’03 Introduction Analytical Model Application

Introduction Why expect an interplay of electron-cloud & beam-beam? Both induce a head-tail ‘wake field’ Both induce a tune shift which varies along the length of the bunch Evidence in simulations Lower threshold for beam blow up was observed in KEKB and PEP-II when both effects were present as compared with the theshold for a single beam or for fewer bunches I review a weak-strong analysis developed in 2001 which was presented at 2-Stream Worksho at KEK (CERN-SL-2001-067) & application to PEP-II; model was inspired by Karel Cornelis. A strong-strong model was later treated by K.Ohmi&A.Chao (PRST-AB 5, 2002)

Simulated beam-size growth and centroid oscillation along the length of a bunch (HEADTAIL, G. Rumolo, 2001) beam size & centroid after 0, 250 & 500 turns, with re=1012 m-3 for SPS-like parameters; e-cloud only only electron cloud

electron cloud & beam-beam, case (1) (HEADTAIL code, G. Rumolo, 2001) beam size & centroid after 0, 250 & 500 turns, with re=1012 m-3 for SPS-like parameters, e-cloud & ‘rotation’ around bunch center due to beam-beam equivalent to x=-0.037; using initial beam size electron cloud & beam-beam, case (1)

electron cloud & beam-beam, case (2) (HEADTAIL code, G. Rumolo, 2001) beam size & centroid after 0, 250 & 500 turns, with re=1012 m-3 for SPS-like parameters, e-cloud & ‘rotation’ around bunch center due to beam-beam equivalent to x=-0.037; using instantaneous electron cloud & beam-beam, case (2)

Analytical Model Few particle model Two primary effects of electron cloud: (1) transverse wake between leading and trailing particles (2) positive tune shift which increases roughly linearly along the bunch Beam-beam effect only represented by additional (quadratic) tune variation along the bunch Not included: ‘wake’-coupling from beam-beam, any nonlinear transverse forces

2-particle model does not yield instability due to a variation of tune with longitudinal position [different from chromaticity, where tune depends on momentum error; see A. Chao’s book, Page 198] minimum number of particles = 3, distributed uniformly in synchrotron phase space:

ordering of particles: (1,3,2), (3,1,2), (3,2,1), (2,3,1), (2,1,3), (1,2,3) 2 1 d 1 2 3 3 z etc.

variation of tune with longitudinal position (a,b>0 for PEP-II) betatron phase of particle j is obtained by integration (assuming unperturbed motion):

Betatron equation of motion for jth particle with e-cloud wake W0: evaluate motion for 1 third synchrotron period; the later 2 thirds are then obtained by permutation of indices ansatz

where if |Dfm-Dfn|<<1, we can expand the exponential if this is not fulfilled, get Bessel functions instead of trigonometric functions

define ec wake ec wake & ec tune shift ec wake & beam-beam tune shift

Rewrite this as

ordering of particles: (1,3,2), (3,1,2) - (3,2,1), (2,3,1) - (2,1,3), (1,2,3) after 1/3 synchrotron period we apply the permutation matrix

stability of the system is determined by eigenvalues of matrix M1/3. Only keeping terms of first and second order and neglecting all higher-order cross products, the matrix simplifies… then the characteristic polynomial becomes e.g., without electron cloud: A=B=C=D=0, (1-l)3=0, and all eigenvalues lie on the unity circle a similar calculation has been done for 4 particles, to explore the dependence on particle number

Example SPS: (1) 3-particle model, e-cloud wake only C=2.4, B=0, A=0, |l|max=6.65,tgrowth=0.88 ms (2) 3-particle model, e-cloud wake&tune shift C=2.4,B=0,A=3.8; |l|max=6.69,tgrowth=0.88 ms (3) 3-particle model, e-cloud wake & tune shift & beam-beam tune shift C=2.4,B=-2.3,A=3.8, |l|max=6.19,tgrowth=0.91 ms (4) 4-particle model, e-cloud wake&tune shift |l|max=5.75,tgrowth=0.71 ms (5) 4-particle model, e-cloud wake & tune shift & |l|max=6.71,tgrowth=0.61 ms changes by 5-10%; however, larger changes for larger beam-beam tune shift eigenvector patterns show larger variation

growth time vs. beam-beam tune shift, SPS like parameters no threshold, unlike 2-particle model (K. Oide)?!

growth rates vs. e-c. wake field, no pinch, no beam-beam apparent ‘threshold’ ~2x105 m-2 2-part. Model threshold ~3.3x105 m-2

PEP-II rough estimate A=0.07, B=0.06, C=0.23 DQec=0.01, DQbb=0.07 (1) 3-particle model, e-cloud wake only |l|max=1.021,tgrowth=4.1 ms (2) 3-particle model, e-cloud wake&tune shift |l|max=1.025,tgrowth=3.3 ms (3) 3-particle model, e-cloud wake & tune shift & beam-beam tune shift, |l|max=1.040,tgrowth=2.1 ms (4) 4-particle model, e-cloud wake & tune shift & beam-beam tune shift |l|max=1.148,tgrowth=0.44 ms

sorry for the horizontal scale! growth time vs. beam-beam tune shift, PEP-II like parameters sorry for the horizontal scale!

growth rates vs. e-c. wake field for PEP-II, no pinch, no beam-beam apparent ‘threshold’ ~6x105 m-2 2-part. Model threshold ~1.1x106 m-2

Summary Beam-beam interaction introduces Gaussian variation of betatron tune along the bunch. Simulations show that this addt’l tune variation enhances e-cloud instability. We developed an analytical model, where a bunch consists of 3 or 4 particles, electron cloud is represented by constant wake and by linear tune shift along the bunch, and beam-beam by parabolic tune shift. Model shows that beam-beam tune shift acts destabilizing Agreement between model and simulation seems to improve with increasing number of particles.