2. The Article 5 provisional report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide: 1Presentation: Liliana Cortellini DG ENV/B1 Bruxelles, 4 April 2006 Nitrates Directive: requirements and experiences of implementation Liliana Cortellini.
Advertisements

Slide: 1Presentation: Liliana Cortellini DG ENV/B3 Vilnius, 14 September 2004 Nitrates Directive: requirements and experiences of implementation Liliana.
Water Quality H. Behrendt, M. Grossmann, H. Gömann, U. Mischke, A. Schöll, J. Steidl GLOWA-Elbe GLOWA Status conference 19 May 2005 Cologne Linkages of.
Baltic HELCOM Stakeholder Conference 7 March 2006, p Eutrophication, and the new HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan How to end Eutrophication – important components.
Gunnar Norén CCB Executive secretary Seminar ”Reducing nutrient run-off from large-scale animal production in the Baltic Sea Region” Presentation ”Agriculture.
Environmetal problems related to manure management Greenhouse gas emission from manure stores.
Danish Agricultural Advisory Service National Centre Nitrogen Input Control on Danish farms Senioradviser Leif Knudsen Danish Agricultural Advisory Service.
Danish GHG and ammonia emissions
Monitoring and assessment of nutrient removal capacity of riverine wetlands (Yalpugh and Cahul river basins) Assessment of current situation and measures.
European Commission, DG Environment Brussels, 05 April 2006 Screening of chapter 27 - Environment Dr. Violeta Vinceviciene European Commission DG Environment.
CCB 3rd seminar on WFD 2004 Sustainable agriculture and recommendations for the new EU member states (with focus on water protection) Maret Merisaar Estonian.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. Nutrients In Nutrients Out.
Anthropogenic Nutrient Sources Fertilizers Human & Animal Wastes Fossil Fuel Combustion Leguminous Crops Potential Ecosystem Effects Algae Blooms Hypoxia.
Introduction of Cau river basin environmental development program
The implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive in Norway Eva Skarbøvik and Stig A. Borgvang Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) with.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES IN PRACTICE Case study Some elements were picked from "Scoping and testing key elements of the economic analysis for the WFD",
Trends in biodiversity and environmental quality: Looking forward Jurgen Tack Anik Schneiders, Stijn Overloop, Myriam Dumortier, Maarten Hens, Luc De Bruyn,
I. Introduction As many case studies have shown, co-operative agreements (CA) can be more effective than other instruments, such as compulsory rules and.
Groundwater chemical status in Denmark Klaus Hinsby, GEUS Climate change and adaptive water management in EU and beyond: Themeday at ATV winter meeting.
Monitoring of the Agricultural Run-off in Latvia ( ) Viesturs Jansons Professor, Head of Department of Environmental Engineering and Water Management.
Green Accounts Nutrient balances Pesticide use Energi use Water use Waste Farmers statement External declaration.
THE CHARACTERISATION OF A RIVER BASIN DISTRICT Case study on the construction of the baseline scenario Inspired from the Oise case (F) Most elements picked.
Overview of World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control Projects in ECA Jitendra Srivastava, Meeta Sehgal & Gary Baker.
Gunnar Norén CCB Executive secretary Baltic Agricultural Production – Contributions to the solution of the Baltic Sea Eutrophication At the Meeting of.
Workshop on Identification of Surface Water Bodies, Brussels, 25/26 September 2003 Identification of Water Bodies in Odense PRB With emphasis on lakes:
Marginal costs of reducing nitrogen losses to water and air in Denmark Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of Food and Resource Economics University.
Workshop on Agricultural Nutrient Reduction,Vilnius September 2004 HELCOM- on the way to nutrient load reduction Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
Regulating Nitrate Pollution – European Approaches Helle Tegner Anker Faculty of Life Sciences Copenhagen University.
SOER 2010 – part C FRESHWATER CZ Edita Jungvirtová Czech Environmental Information Agency.
- Proposed actions, targets and indicators to reach the objectives
Environmental Services Training Group
WATER POLLUTION IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
The Netherlands: manure policy and request for a derogation to the livestock manure limit of 170 kg N/ha per year for dr. ir. Cindy.
Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen
The Nitrates Directive implementation in the EU Blue Waters and Green Agriculture Conference 10 May 2017 Bucharest Marco Bonetti ENV D1 – Land Use & Management.
Environmental policies in Europe
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis when implementing the WFD in Denmark
EU Water framework The best practice in Germany
An example of Finland's approach to wastewater treatment for households in rural areas Kimmo Tiilikainen Minister of the Environment Finland
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC)
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
WORKING PARTY "AGRICULTURE and ENVIRONMENT" of the Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics December 2008 Policy needs related to N cycle.
State of play of French progress in cost-effectiveness analysis
Water & Agriculture Seamus Barron Nitrates, Biodiversity & Engineering Division.
2. The Odense PRB Work Plan
Soil Fertility and Fertiliser Plans
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen
reduction aims for nutrients
What’s a WQIP and what can they achieve?
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Optimized treatment, recycling and use of degassed biomass as fertilizer Tyge Kjær Roskilde University
The Common Agricultural Policy and the Water Framework Directive
on the way to designate SACs…
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Meeting of the Water Directors - Athens, 17/18 June 2003
Rural development support for implementing the Water Framework Directive Expert Group on WFD and Agriculture Seville, 6-7 April 2010.
PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES IN PRACTICE
UK experience of Programmes of Measures
CIS Expert group on WFD & Agriculture Nitrates Directive and Water Framework Directive Edinburgh 10th October 2012 Luisa Samarelli DG ENV Agriculture,
Presentation transcript:

2. The Article 5 provisional report 1st meeting of EU Strategic Steering Group WFD/Agriculture 25 April 2005, Brussels Odense Pilot River Basin Links between WFD and Agriculture Harley Bundgaard Madsen Head of Marine- and Hydrology Department, Fyn County, DK 1. Introduction 2. The Article 5 provisional report 3. Agricultural pressure and impact on Odense Fjord 4. Programme of measures 5. Agri Environmental Schemes 6. Conclusions

Odense Pilot River Basin Denmark, Europe Odense Fjord Natura 2000 areas Odense City Odense River Power plant

Odense River Basin Land use: Agriculture: Urban areas: 16% The basin: 250.000 inhabitants Area: 1050 km2 Land use: Urban areas: 16% Agriculture: 68% Woodland: 10% Nature (meadows, mires, dry grasslands, wetlands): 6% Agriculture: 1870 farms (50% livestock farms) Livestock production: 60.000 LU (59% pigs, 37% cattle), 1 mill. pigs/year Livestock density: 0,9 LU/ha Odense Fjord Natura 2000 areas Odense City (180.000 inhab.) Odense River

Odense Pilot River Basin The overall aims Phase 1, 2003-2004: An Article 5 provisional report and reporting on testing the EU Guidance Documents Phase 2, 2005-2006: A Pilot River Basin Management Plan incl. Programme of Measures and a monitoring programme. Focus Area: WFD and Agriculture (LIFE Application: OdensePRB-AgriPoM)

WFD Article 5 Provisional Report Conclusions

Coastal waters Odense Fjord Area: 63 km2 Mean depth: 2,3 m Max. depth: 8 m Mean residence time of water from River Odense: Inner fjord: 9 d. All fjord: 17 d. Area load to the fjord (2001): - N: 32 gN/m2 P: 0,88 gP/m2 Gabet Hindsholm Odense Fjord Klintebjerg Værft Seden Strand Fynsværket Odense

Impact on Odense Fjord: Eutrophication Filamentous algae and eelgrass Ulva

Oxygen depletion August-September 2002 3.747 km2 : < 4 mg oxygen per liter 2.586 km2 : < 2 mg oxygen per liter L:\BVH\ilt2002\2002sep 2002udbred_26aug20sep.gif 14cm i bredde

Odense Fjord N and P load and concentration Nitrogen Phosphorus

Pressures on Odense Fjord: Power Plant, Shipyard, Landfill

Pressure on Odense Fjord: Wastewater Wastewater Treatment Plants in Odense River Basin: BOD-removal: 99% N-removal: 93% P-removal: 98%

Pressure Agriculture Production of livestock The catchment houses aprox. 60.000 livestock units (LU) which equals 0,9 LU/ha Number of livestock units per hectare cultivated area (LU/ha) 1,0 LU = 36 pigs produced per year (100 kg N in manure/year) Figur 1.3.1 (Ole Jørgensen må have en brugbar original, hvis denne ikke kan bruges…)

Pressure Agriculture Use of N in fertilisers on the fields

Pressure Agriculture N-balance Nitrogen Balance in Odense River Basin: Total N-input: 12,400 tonnes Utilised in products: 4,300 tonnes N-surplus lost to the environment: 8,100 tonnes 8,100 t N/year equals N in untreated wastewater from 1.8 mio. people!

Programme of Measures Conceptual Diagram Env. Objectives Env. Conditions Economy ok? - Cost effectiveness - Disproportional? Max. acceptable loading Households and Industri Agriculture Physical Conditions

Programme of Measures Ecological condition of Odense Fjord versus nitrogen loading from the catchment (Conceptual Diagram) Ecological qualiy elements Deptlimit Eel-grasses Concentration Nitrogen Macroalgae WFD- Classification Bad……….. Poor…..….. Moderate... Good……. High……….. Reference.. Loading Tons N/Year Max N-loadings ( Target load )

Reference Conditions Eelgrass depth limits ca. 1890 and today (1990ies) l:\bvh\hav\alegraes\alegraes_gr.png og alegraes_gr_sig.png

Programme of Measures Nitrogen Load (landbased) to Odense Fjord (Normalized to mean water discharge 1980-2002)

Programme of Measures Agriculture (Example: Odense Fjord, pollution from agriculture) Quantitative ecological quality criteria for Odense Fjord (objectives) Economy ok? - Cost effectiveness - Disproportional? Target for maximum loading (ton/yr); (ton/month) Target for maximum leachage (kg/ha) Target for land use Target for maximum fertilizing (kg/ha) Wetlands (ha) Catch-crops Extent of nature areas (ha) Manure (LU/ha); (kg/ha) Fertilizer (kg/ha)

“VFD-scenario” Scenario on agricultural measures in the catchment of Area ha (percent of agricultural area) Reduced Leaching Tonnes Nitrogen Reduced loading Odense Fjord Tonnes N Cost + Cost eff. 1000 Dkr DDK/kg N removed 20% reduction on national N-fertilizer quota 508 254 10.160 40 Wetlands in River-valleys 4000 (5,7%) 400 11.600 29 New forests on cultivated areas 5000 (7,1%) 214 112 14.000 125 Increased use of Catch-crops 185 93 1.302 14 10% higher utilisation of all manure 148 74 2.960 17% reduced livestock production (10000 LU pigs) 108 54 16.200 300 Reduction in cultivated area (urbanisation) 1470 (2%) 57 - Organic farming - increased area 2500 (3,6%) 50 25 7.175 287 Catch-crops: Optimised use of existing catch-crops 3200 (4,6%) 38 19 Total reduction and total costs Cost efficiency – average 1600 1060 63.000 59 Dkr/kgN Odense Fjord loading today (flow normalized): 2000 “VFD-scenario” Scenario on agricultural measures in the catchment of Odense Fjord to meet provisional WFD- objectives Source: Danish Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries and Danish Forest and Nature Agency December 2003

WFD-scenario, Odense Fjord Scenario on agricultural measures in the catchment of Odense Fjord to meet environmental objectives Effect of agricultural programme of measures and costs Reduced loading to Odense Fjord Nitrogen Cost + Cost –effectiveness EURO Total 1060 tonnes/yr 4-8 million EURO/yr Cost effectiveness 4-8 EURO/kg N Current sewage treatment and maintenance of sewer systems 40 million EURO/yr Total loading to Odense Fjord 2000 tonnes/year Source: Danish Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries and Danish Forest and Nature Agency December 2003

Heavily modified watercources Restoration, establisment of wetlands and bufferzones

Wetlands 1890-1992 Odense Pilot River Basin

Agri Environmental Schemes (Agreements on Environmental friendly farming) Fyn County: 48.000 ha identified as env. sensitive areas (21% of agricultural area) 1999: Agreements on 5.900 ha (2,6% of the agricultural area) 2004: Agreements on 7.050 ha (3,1% of the agricultural area) Voluntary and temporary agreements (5 and 20 years)

Conclusion 1 To achieve the WFD’s objective (good ecological status) in Odense Fjord it’s necessary to reduce the nitrogen loading by about 50% (1000 tons N/year or 9.5 kg N/ha) The expenses related to agriculture amounts 30-60 mill DKK (4-8 mill EURO) per year The most cost effective measures (14-40 DKK/kg N) are extended use of catch crops, establishment of wetlands, higher utilisation of N in manure and reduction of total nitrogen use Measures as wetlands, buffer zones along rivers and lakes and afforestation give added bonus in the form of more nature in the basin

Conclusion 2 Current Agri Environmental Schemes (agreements on environmental friendly farming) are not at all sufficient to cover the expenses The current Agri Environmental Schemes favour the Natura 2000 land areas at the expense of the national/regional nature areas There is a need for financial support in catchments to Natura 2000 marine areas and other sensitive marine areas Voluntary and temporary schemes will not ensure achievement of the WFD objectives in time An expected increase of the agriculture production in the basin will threaten the achievement of the WFD objectives

Odense Pilot River Basin Thank you for your attention…

Natura 2000 areas Natura 2000 area Catchment to Natura 2000 areas

Expected development in agricultural production (source: Danish Agriculture) Denmark Fyn County 2001 2015 Pig production (mio/yr) 21,8 26,0 (+ 19 %) 2,1 2,9 (+ 39 %) Live stock units (mio) 1 LSU = 100 kg N in manure from storage tanks 2,6 2,3 (- 12 %) 0,2 0,2 (0 %) Agricultural area (mio ha) 2,67 2,50 (- 6 %)

Restored wetlands in Denmark and Fyn County APAE II, Goal: 12.500 ha (3.600 tons N) APAE III, Goal: +4.000 ha (+ 1.050 tons) Restored wetlands by 2003: 1.870 ha. Fyn County: Restored wetlands by 2003: 486 ha (130 tons N)

Agri Environmental Schemes (Agreements on Environmental friendly farming) Applications for financial support 2004 (mill DKK) Available financial support (mill DKK) Denmark Fyn County (1/10 x DK) Natura 2000 Other areas 460 916 31 44 310 ~ 31 Natura 2000 areas: 2% of total area of Fyn County Nature areas: 6% of total area of Fyn County