ESF Training Seminar Reinforced role for the Audit Authority

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden First level controls - Certification of Expenditure INTERREG IIIC.
EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
EN DG Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11 October 2007 Management and control arrangements OPEN DAYS 2007 Financial Control : New.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Planning and use of funding instruments
OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 – 2013 programming period
2 Slovenia Signed Contract of Confidence for the period Compliance assessment for one programme for the new period Experience of a Certifying.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
“Train the trainers” seminar
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
European Union Cohesion Policy
Financial Institute for Regional Development, PI Understanding the roles and functions of Certifying and Audit Authorities in European Territorial Cooperation.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 
Development of internal control: methodology and responsibility
Single Audit Strategy LATVIA. Audit System The Audit Authority functions are carried out by the Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of.
The verification of public investments.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 System evaluation and sampling – first.
How does the ECA assess Member States’ internal control systems? Workshop on Audit/Evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Ankara,
Financial management and control
S7: Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning.
Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning process To finalise the audit approach.
Regional Policy Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT.
29 March 2011 Audit Authority Audit Department Ministry of Finance 1.
Structural Funds in Ireland Structural Funds in Ireland Financial management, Financial management, control & audit - Ireland Dermot Byrne Head of Unit.
Closure of the Programming Period ESF TWG Luxemburg 2 nd December 2015.
Structural Funds in Ireland Structural Funds in Ireland Financial control & audit - Financial control & audit - ERDF & Cohesion Fund operations Dermot.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 DG Regional Policy’s evaluation of the compliance assessment process for the programming period COCOF.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
1 Fraud indicators for ERDF, ESF and CF Leif HÖGNÄS, DG Regional Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
S&E and BMW Regional Operational Programmes 14 – 20 Training for Local Authorities involved in DUCGS projects, 21st April 2016 REPORTING, DATA COLLECTION.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Risk assessment and planning.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
Residual Risk Rate: Concept and implications for the AA and the Commission at closure Carmine Mollica DG Regional and Urban Policy – Unit C1.
Improve 1st level control for greater efficiency of Structural Funds José Santos Soeiro President Financial Institute for Regional Development.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Transnational training seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners to INTEREGG IIIB-CADSES procedures for 3° call for proposal CADSES implementation.
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Experiences of Audits of the European Commission in the Region of Saxony-Anhalt Mechthild v. Maydell Head of the Audit Authority for the Region of Saxony-Anhalt.
The Audit Authority The Netherlands Meeting AA Italy June 10th 2010
Role & Responsibilities
Communication campaign
Role & Responsibilities
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Timing June : Negotiations with Council and EP: modification of the Financial Regulation subject to ordinary legislative procedure End 2011:
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Commission Regulation (EC)
Management & Control, Designation of Authorities State of play
Good practices for risk assessment and control activities
ECA Quality Control Arrangements
Presentation transcript:

ESF Training Seminar Reinforced role for the Audit Authority 2007 - 2013 Fiona Kilcullen ESF Audit Authority European Social Fund Financial Control Unit A Unit established by the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment and part financed by the European Union Davitt House, 65a Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, Ireland. . 9th December 2009

Volume of spending For Ireland €375 million ESF in 2007-2013 due to be spent mainly by Department of Education and Science, FAS, Department of Justice Equality and Law Reform and Department of Social and Family Affairs

The Regulations – Structure and size of the Regulations: Council Regulation (EC) 1083/2006 108 Articles and 4 Annexes Council Regulation 1260/1999 56 Articles and no Annexes Commission Regulation 1828/2006 55 Articles and 23 Annexes Commission Regulation 438/2001 23 Articles and 5 Annexes complexity of the rules and no simplification

How assurance will be built up 2007-2013 Ex post During implementation Ex ante

Shared Management - Division of responsibility Member State responsible for: -Seting up of a management and control system which complies with requirements of Regulations -Ensuring that systems are function effectively - i.e. certification reliable -Preventing, detecting, correcting irregularities -Making financial corrections Commission supervisory role involves Satisfying itself “set up” of systems is compliant Verifying effective functioning of the management and control system Using powers of interrupting and suspension of payments Making financial corrections

control and audit framework 2007-2013 Organisation of the control and audit framework 2007-2013

What is your role in the National Cascade? *System based Audit by DETE and Management Checks   System based Audit by Managing Authority and Management Checks Intermediate Body What is your role in the National Cascade?

Managing Authority (1/2) Responsibility for implementing the programme, in particular for: Selection of operations Administrative and on-spot verifications of operations Compliance with information and publicity requirements Ensuring the audit trail (levels: MA/intermediate body and beneficiary) Art. 60 Council Regulation

Managing Authority (2/2) Other responsibilities To inform beneficiaries of all conditions for funding, including the time limit for execution To satisfy itself (before grant approval) that beneficiary has capacity to fulfil conditions Administrative verifications on all payment requests Written standards and proper recording of checks Art. 13 Implementation Regulation

Certifying Authority (1/2) Responsibilities of CA practically unchanged compared to 2000-06. Function: to draw up and submit to Commission certified expenditure statements and payment requests Certification of expenditure with regard to: accuracy of data; must be based on reliable accounting system and verifiable supporting documents compliance with ESF and national rules Art. 61 of C.R. and 20 Implementation Regulation

Certifying Authority (2/2) Maintaining computerised accounting records Keeping accounts of amounts recoverable and amounts recovered Art. 61 of C.R. Sending to Commission annual reports on amounts recoverable, recovered and withdrawn following cancellation Art. 20 Implementation Regulation

ESF Audit Authority - Introduction Who: ESF Financial Control Unit, Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment Statute: functionally independent of Managing and Certifying Authority Scope:Human Capital Investment Operational Programme Delegation: Cascade Internal Audit Units Overall task: to provide each year an opinion and annual control report on the effective functioning of the management and control system and the correctness of declared expenditure

Audit Authority - Functions (Organisation of) systems audits by Cascade Internal Audit Units (Organisation of) audits of operations by ESF FCU Presented an audit strategy in 2008 Annual control report + opinion Submitting a partial or final closure declaration Ensure use of internationally accepted audit standards Ensure independence and supervision of other audit bodies Also - ESF Compliance Assessment Body

Audit Authority – Audit Strategy (Art. 62 (1) c 1083/2006 and Art A Planning document: contributes to high quality annual control reports, audit opinions and closure declarations; covers whole programming period Deadline for presentation:Accepted by EU Commission December 2008 Model Audit Strategy: annex V Reg. 1828/2006 = minimum requirements Annual (or more frequent) updates

Audit Authority – Systems audits by Cascade Internal Audit Units (Art. 62 (1) a 1083/2006) Objective: To verify effective functioning of management and control systems of the OP + evaluation of the reliability of the system (high/average/low) Scope: evaluation of key internal control elements audit of horizontal issues eg procurement, publicity, eligibility Main authorities and intermediate bodies covered as early as possible by ESF FCU and Cascade Internal Audit units Audit period : July n to June n+1 (for report by 31/12/n+1)

Audit Authority uses work of Cascade audit bodies – standards for assessment (1) ISA 600 Internal audit services (ISA 610 + INTOSAI 25) Objectivity/independence Professional competence/Size Evidence recording/supervision/reviews Internal audit coverage External experts (ISA 620 + INTOSAI 25) Competence/reputation/standing Relation to auditee/independence Auditors own assessment

Main elements of ISA 600 Due care in selecting the other auditor Independence Professional competence Proper working relationships between principal auditor and other auditor Reporting: Form and content Review of the work of the other auditor

Review of Cascade audits What would you look at ? Are the scope, objectives and audit criteria adequate? Was work done according to planned scope and objectives? Is there adequate documentation & working papers? Are conclusions adequate in relation to work done? Report: is the - Format & content adequate, clear, concise? Described: Scope, objectives, audit criteria and work done? Opinion consistent with findings? Signed? Who ? Adequate follow up done ? Reperform the audit?

Further examination in case systemic issues appear Audits of operations by ESF FCU - Objectives (Art. 62 (1) b 1083/2006, Art. 16-17 1828/2006 + annex IV) Audits shall verify that: Operations meet selection criteria for the OP Operations implemented according to approval decision Expenditure declared corresponds to accounting records and supporting documentation Compliant with Community and national rules Public contribution paid to the beneficiary Further examination in case systemic issues appear

Audits of operations by ESF FCU - Objectives (Art Audits of operations by ESF FCU - Objectives (Art. 62 (1) b 1083/2006, Art. 16-17 1828/2006 + annex IV) Sampling: Method in accordance with IAAS and to be documented Non statistical random sample with materiality (<= 2%) Complementary sample In case of specific risks or insufficient coverage Timetable: - random sample reference period: Jan. - Dec. year n - audit period: 01 July-30 June year n + 1 - annual control report: by 31/12/n + 1

Compliance Assessment (Art. 71 (2) 1083/2006 and Art Compliance Assessment (Art. 71 (2) 1083/2006 and Art. 25 1828/2006 + annex XII + Guidance note on Compliance Assessment) Accepted by EU Commission in 2008. Key recommendations: 2000 – 2006 audit recommendations to be implemented Procedures manuals to reflect: Department of Finance Structural Funds Circular 12 of 2008 Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment 2008 eligibility Circular for ESF www.esf.ie Procedures for regular review and update of procedures manual

Compliance Assessment (Art. 71 (2) 1083/2006 and Art Compliance Assessment (Art. 71 (2) 1083/2006 and Art. 25 1828/2006 + annex XII + Guidance note on Compliance Assessment) Scope: Ex-ante assessment of the set up of management and control system (Articles 58-62 of EC 1083/2006) Systems description provided by the ESF Managing Authority EU guide on Compliance Assessment- It should be noted that this exercise refers to the adequacy of the design of the management and control systems, which means that the Commission expects an opinion on the set up of the systems and not on their practical effectiveness at this stage.

Annual Control Report (Art. 62 (1) d (i) 1083/2006, Art Annual Control Report (Art. 62 (1) d (i) 1083/2006, Art. 18 (2) 1828/2006 + annex VI) Established and signed by ESF FCU as Audit Authority Reporting of expenditure by 31/12 in year n, audited between 01/07 (n) – 30/06 (n+1), report to be delivered by 31/12 (n+1) Report 31/12/2009 covers 01/07/08-30/06/09 Model Report (annex VI Reg. 1828/2006) sets minimum requirements

Annual Control Report (Art. 62 (1) d (i) 1083/2006, Art Annual Control Report (Art.62 (1) d (i) 1083/2006, Art.17 (3) and18 (2) 1828/2006 + annex VI) Jan July Jan n+1 July n+1 Dec n+1 Jan n+2 Reference period Report deadline Audit period

Annual Control report – Model : Model annual control report Introduction Changes in management and control systems Changes to audit strategy Systems audits Audits of samples of operations Co-ordination between audit bodies and supervisory work of the audit authority Follow-up of previous years’ audit activity Other Information (if applicable) Table declared expenditure and sample audits

Obligation to report on error rates Requirements to provide error rates Prescribed in EC 1828/2006: Annex VI Model Annual Control Report Annex VIII Model Final Control Report Closure declaration Why to report on error rates? Indication of the quality of the management and control system Closure of a programme project Calculation of the error rate

Audit Opinion: Which assurance is to be provided on what (1/4) Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 Article 62 Compliance with Articles 58-62 of 1083/2006 and Section 3 of 1828/2006 Management and control system functions effectively; As to provide reasonable assurance that statements of expenditure are correct and as a consequence reasonable assurance that the underlying transactions are legal and regular.

Audit opinion: ‘Reasonable Assurance’ (2/4) High but not absolute assurance: Statements are free of material mistakes Material: so significant that it would influence a decision Materiality is now set in the Regulation (2%) ‘

Audit Opinion - Legality and Regularity (3/4) Reasonable assurance on legality and regularity of underlying transactions: Legality and regularity : The (financial) audit objective of legality and regularity seeks to ensure that a transaction conforms to the applicable laws and regulations and is covered by sufficient budgetary appropriations.

Types of audit opinions (4/4) Unqualified, Qualified , Adverse Reasons for qualified and adverse opinions are to be explained Impact of a qualified opinion needs to be quantified No quantification of an adverse opinion

Closure declaration (Art. 62 (1) e 1083/2006, Art Closure declaration (Art. 62 (1) e 1083/2006, Art. 18 (3) 1828/2006 + annex VIII) (updated) audit strategy + annual control report + opinion = continuous control process => preparation for closure AA provides declaration on validity of payment claim + legality and regularity of underlying transactions in final statement of expenditure + final control report at the latest by 31/03/2017 Based on all audit work carried out under the responsibility of AA Model: annex VIII Reg.1828/2006 Document retention period: 3 years following closure

Conclusions (1/3) EC is accountable to EU Budget Authorities the Shared Management Concept makes MS responsible for implementation of the Cohesion Policy including ESF Strong Partnership between EC and MS to deliver assurance on the legality and regularity of expenditure Commission needs the assurance from the MS on the correct implementation Change in the concept: more responsibility given to MS and Commission will rely more on the work of the MS

Conclusions (2/3) An enforced role is given in the Regulation to the MS as regards to provide assurance to the Commission: Ex-ante Compliance assessment of systems by MS Assurance on declared expenditure not only to be given at winding up stage but on an annual basis in the form of an annual audit opinion Commission will rely more on audit work of Member States Single audit concept

Conclusions 3/3 Changes in the regularity framework 2007-2013 The responsibilities for the MA and the CA essentially remain the same More detailed requirements defined as regards to the Audit Authority Audit strategy at set up + annual updates Models for opinions, error rates etc Statistical & Non Statistical sampling prescribed in the Regulation Demonstrate link between systems audits and audits on operations

Guidance ESF claims my be adjusted based on findings of National Authorities without loss of ESF to Ireland Guidance – See www.esf.ie and www.etenders.ie if not clear - contact the ESF MA, CA or AA

The following are common errors found in ESF claims: Evidence of publicity Record retention and format Match-funding statements Claims and Returns Applications Debtors reports Audit trail Eligibility – eg recoverable VAT, bank interest, capital Over financing Treatment of errors / Irregularities Accruals Trainee attendance Trainer costs Voluntary organisations Procurement rules not followed

ESF Cascade Structure 2007 - 2013 *System based Audit by DETE and Management Checks System based Audit by Managing Authority and Management Checks Intermediate Body   ESF Cascade Structure 2007 - 2013

Contact: See www.esf.ie Internal Audit & ESF Financial Control Units Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment Kildare Street Dublin 2 Phone 01 631 22 15 E-mail fiona_kilcullen@entemp.ie See www.esf.ie

Thank you for your attention! Questions & Answers