Engaging Stakeholders in TMDL Implementation Plan Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
How to Work with Government Building & Maintaining Relationships.
Planning for Our Future:
Soil and Water Conservation in Georgia Helping people help the land.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Transparency, Risk Communication and Stakeholder Engagement for a Diverse Audience in the 21 st Century Ruth Hull & Josephine Archbold Intrinsik Environmental.
Business Environmental Risk Management Ray Massey University of Missouri Commercial Ag Program,
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Why Develop Watershed Plans? Little Hunting Creek Watershed Plan Case Study #1: The Little Hunting Creek Watershed Management Plan Fairfax County, Virginia.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Commodity and Regulatory Activities January 2010.
Soil and Water Conservation in Georgia Improving Georgia’s Natural Resources to Help People Help the Land Georgia Association of Georgia Soil and Water.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): -Adoption of.
WATERSHED PLANNING A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS University of Missouri Water Quality Program Staff: Bob Broz, Dan Downing, John Tharp.
RESOURCE EFFICIENCY IN LATIN AMERICA: ECONOMICS AND OUTLOOK 1.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Training Module 3. What You’ll Learn In This Module Conservation Districts’ State and Federal partners Districts’ non-profit partners Other organizations.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Where We’ve Been Where We Are Going South Lahontan Regional Workshop Palmdale July 10, 2007.
Animal Agriculture and Water Resources in Texas Ned Meister Director of Commodity and Regulatory Activities Texas Farm Bureau Steel Maloney Principal Hydrologist.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
A Plan for Clean Water in Smith Creek Nesha Mizel VA Dept. of Conservation and Recreation.
Photos: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation/ National Park Service SHENANDOAH VALLEY WATER RESOURCES STRATEGIC PLAN John Staelin, Chair,
Source Water Protection The Great Lakes RCAP Process for Planning SMART Design Committee Workshop Presented by: Julie Ward Ohio Field Agent April 29, 2008.
Environmental Literacy Plan Citizen’s Advisory Committee TO THE Chesapeake Bay Executive Council September 6th 2012.
Source Water Collaborative Online Partnership Tool 1 Collaboration Toolkit: Protecting Drinking Water Sources through Agricultural Conservation Practices.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
BSE Extension Program Natural Resources Management Natural Resources Management Water Resources Management Water Resources Management Waste Management.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Tips for Successful Proposals Michael P. O’Neill CSL.
Session Chair:David Ward, Loudoun Watershed Watch Panelists:Gem Bingol, Piedmont Environmental Council Joe Ivers, PhD, Virginia Waters and Wetlands, Inc.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
The NH Climate Action Plan and the need for Adaptation Sherry Godlewski NH Department of Environmental Services
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Partners in Conservation
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Protecting the Quality of our Water
Croatia Agriculture Pollution Control project
Creating Partnerships: EPA R8, NRCS, and States
National 303(d)/TMDL Webinar Series Tuesday, May 2nd, 1:00-3:00 pm EST
Current VA Ag Initiatives
Creating and Managing Watershed Stewardship Programs Session 5
Soil Science Chapter #1.
Commonwealth of Virginia
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIPS
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group SAG Meeting
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Engaging Stakeholders in TMDL Implementation Plan Development Karen Kline Senior Research Scientist National 303(d)/TMDL Webinar Series May 21, 2019 Department of Biological Systems Engineering

Acronyms and other notes IP – TMDL Implementation Plan DEQ – Virginia Department of Environmental Quality BSE – Department of Biological Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech

Outline Review of Literature Practical Application Tara Wyrick, VA DEQ Valley Region

Review of Literature Adaptive Implementation of Water Quality Improvement Plans: Opportunities and Challenges Shapman, et al. 2007. Nicolas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Nicholas Institute, Duke University, September 2007.

Review of Literature Approaches to TMDL Planning and Policy Tools for Implementation to Achieve Water Quality Standards Jesiek, et al. 2007. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, No. 084.

Review of Literature Building Consensus for Better Water Quality Outcomes Dukes, Frank. 2016. National 303(d)/TMDL Webinar Series. September, 2016.

Source: Int. Assoc. for Public Participation, 2019 (www.iap2.org)

Outline Review of Literature Practical Applications Planning – a conceptual perspective Who are stakeholders? What roles can/should stakeholders play? How are stakeholders engaged effectively? Lessons learned (so far)!

Outline Review of Literature Practical Applications Planning – a conceptual perspective Who are stakeholders? What roles can/should stakeholders play? How are stakeholders engaged effectively? Lessons learned (so far)!

Outline Review of Literature Practical Applications Planning – a conceptual perspective Who are stakeholders? What roles can/should stakeholders play? How are stakeholders engaged effectively? Lessons learned (so far)!

Outline Review of Literature Practical Applications Planning – a conceptual perspective Who are stakeholders? What roles can/should stakeholders play? How are stakeholders engaged effectively? Lessons learned (so far)!

Outline Review of Literature Practical Applications Planning – a conceptual perspective Who are stakeholders? What roles can/should stakeholders play? How are stakeholders engaged effectively? Lessons learned (so far)!

Watershed Management/ TMDL Implementation Planning - a conceptual perspective

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: Are affected by water quality (WQ) problems

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: Contribute to pollutant loads or impact WQ VA Dept of Conservation and Recreation

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: May be required to install control measures cdc.gov Inspectapedia.com

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: Have statutory or regulatory WQ responsibilities Daily News-Record lakesuperiorstreams.org

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: May help develop or implement remedial actions Neiman Plumbing Chesapeake Forest Buffers

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: Live in the watershed or use the water resource Roanoke Times VA Dept of Conservation and Recreation

Who are Stakeholders? Those that: May improve the chances of a successful implementation

Who are Stakeholders? Federal Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? State Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? Environmental Protection State Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? State Agencies Environmental Protection Conservation Recreation, Parks State Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? State Agencies Environmental Protection Health Conservation Recreation, Parks State Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? State Agencies Environmental Protection Health Forestry Conservation Recreation, Parks State Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? State Agencies Environmental Protection Health Forestry Energy, Mining Minerals Conservation Recreation, Parks State Agencies

Who are Stakeholders? Local Government

Who are Stakeholders? Local Government

Environmental Planners Who are Stakeholders? Local Government Regional/District Environmental Planners

Environmental Planners Who are Stakeholders? Local Government County/City Departments Regional/District Environmental Planners

Cooperative Extension Environmental Planners Who are Stakeholders? Local Government County/City Departments Cooperative Extension County Agents Regional/District Environmental Planners

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens Environmental Groups

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens Environmental Groups Watershed Roundtables

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens Animal Environmental Groups Watershed Roundtables

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens Farm Bureau Animal Groups Environmental Groups Watershed Roundtables

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens Farm Bureau Civic Groups Animal Groups Environmental Groups Watershed Roundtables

Who are Stakeholders? Businesses Community Groups Citizens Farm Bureau Homeowner Associations Civic Groups Animal Groups Environmental Groups Watershed Roundtables

What roles can/should stakeholders play? Stakeholder engagement model TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Steering Committee Working Group Resource Team

Start with a Resource Team Technical Contractor Soil and Water Conservation District(s) State Dept of Environmental Protection County/City representatives Watershed and/or Civic Groups

Public Meetings Outreach/notification Email lists Mailings Phone calls Newspaper articles Web sites Flyers Community events Signs in the watershed

Public Meetings Typically two One to initiate the process Final meeting to share IP

Potential Working Groups Community Agricultural Residential Municipal University Commercial Pollutant Source Categories Agriculture Residential/Urban Channel erosion Pollutant Sediment Nutrients Organic matter Hydrologic modification Bacteria

Steering Committee Resource Team Steering Committee Working Group TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Steering Committee Working Group Resource Team

Engaging Stakeholders Effectively Include food Nesha McRae, VA DEQ Valley Region

Engaging Stakeholders Effectively Make sure the meetings run on time and at convenient times

Engaging Stakeholders Effectively Utilize smaller working groups

Engaging Stakeholders Effectively Utilize smaller working groups

Engaging Stakeholders Effectively Use maps or other visual aids to help encourage interaction

Engaging Stakeholders Effectively Educate as you go through the process Take watershed tours Provide reference material specific to tasks

Lessons Learned Organization Coordinate with existing watershed groups when possible Engage stakeholders with meaningful tasks Schedule meetings when convenient to stakeholders Provide structure, but be flexible in the details

Lessons Learned Communication Resource Team coordination is essential Email and web sites are low-cost, convenient communication media One size doesn’t fit all

Lessons Learned Education Hands-on interaction with maps got stakeholders involved As a facilitator, look for educational opportunities at each step of the process Inform without overwhelming Education is mutual – not just for stakeholders

Thank you