Atmospheric Sciences On the Journey to Assessing Learning Outcomes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
Advertisements

MS Program Learning Outcomes. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Measures and CriteriaAssessment Schedule 1. Demonstrate knowledge of broad and specialty.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
Mechanical Engineering 1 Graduate Programs Degree Programs –Master of Engineering or M.E. (thesis option) –Master of Science or M.S. (non-thesis option)
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Assessment Report Department of Environmental Science and Biology School of Sciences and Mathematics Chair: Christopher Norment Assessment Coordinator:
1 C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs Bob Smallwood, University of.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
ABET Accreditation Process Chemical Engineering Department Prof. Emad Ali.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Refresher Course on Assessment A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others January 22, 2016.
Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.
AL Maaref University The Road Ahead FBA Student Induction Day Hussin Jose Hejase, PhD March 4, 2016.
MATT KEMMIS APRIL 15, 2015 WEEK 7 DB ADDRESSING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE AT CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Refresher Course on Assessment
Existing Situation The course COMP 915 (Technical Communication in Computer Science, 1 hour) is currently a requirement for obtaining a PhD in computer.
DIRECTED ADMINISTRATIVE PORTFOLIO
Making assessment in PhD programs more useful for faculty and students
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
Graduate School Orientation
ABET Definitions Objectives Outcomes Broad Statements
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Closing the Assessment Loop
CURRICULUM DESIGN Part 2 of 2 PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES PROGRAM OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES.
Assessment of Student Learning
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Program Review and Planning
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Accreditation and curriculum
Assessment and Accreditation
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Neelam Soundarajan Chair, Undergrad Studies Comm. CSE Department
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Health Care Management Angell Snyder School of Business
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Online Undergraduate Psychology B.A. Program
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
ACS Approval Program for Bachelor’s Degree Programs (2015)
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

Atmospheric Sciences On the Journey to Assessing Learning Outcomes John Horel, Chair, john.horel@utah.edu

How Did We Get Here? 2008: Increased financial pressures on Department 2008-2009: holistic examination of curriculum 2010: Curriculum revisions implemented: changing from a rigid course progression for majors to distinct even and odd year sequences shifting the emphasis from required courses to elective courses for majors offering many required and elective courses only every other year and reducing prerequisites offering some required and elective classes as half semester short courses for undergraduates only having undergraduate students enroll in the first half semester of a course that continues for graduate students for the entire semester

Did Those Changes Make A Difference? Benefits to stabilize funding, teaching loads, course offerings Concerns of students & faculty at the outset have continued Need to reevaluate and implement changes Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00115.1

2017-2018: First Steps The department curriculum committee began work to review and make recommendations regarding the undergraduate curriculum Major restructuring of the curriculum recommended to better meet the needs of our students Town Hall in September 2018 provided feedback from students, faculty, staff on curriculum, including: Undergrads: would like to see “tracks” (e.g., atmospheric scientist, environmental scientist) so they have an idea of what to take depending on career interests Grad students: graduate electives are burdensome with exceptional demands on their time Faculty: Not much momentum for online classes at this time, although the general feeling was that if we do one, it should be in an area we can do something unique, such as mountain weather or air quality

2018-2021: Timeline Fall 2018: Syllabi requested for all existing and future courses from faculty Each syllabus needed to include Course Outcomes & Evaluation Methods 2018-2019: Monthly discussions with faculty ongoing Fall 2019: Goal to introduce and discuss changes with students deferred to Fall Fall 2020: Implement revised curriculum AY 2020-21: Have in place more comprehensive Assessment for individual courses and Program overall

Department Review 7-Year Department Review in final stage Recommendations from the Department Review: 1) establish clear, measurable expected outcomes of student learning 2) ensure that students have sufficient opportunities to achieve those outcomes 3) systematically gather, analyze, and interpret both direct and indirect evidence to determine how well student learning matches our expectations 4) use the resulting information to understand and improve student learning

Peer Institutions Fall 2018: Heads and Chairs Meeting of the American Meteorological Society/American Geophysical Union Defining learning outcomes for courses mandatory at nearly all institutions Concerns regarding the applicability of the ABET level of assessment Assessment approaches used by most institutions Exit surveys common Mapping of courses to outcomes increasingly expected Quantifying evaluation of learning outcomes at the course level remain rare Exit exams very rare

American Meteorological Society Guidelines: Raising Awareness of Diverse Opportunities in the Field

Back to the Future: Draft Tracks Professional Meteorologist. This option is intended for students interested in applying knowledge of the atmosphere in diverse careers, for example, weather forecasting, mountain weather and climate, analysis and interpretation of geophysical data, or broadcasting. This option satisfies the requirements of the federal government for employment as a meteorologist with the National Weather Service and what is expected by many other agencies and private firms relying on weather and climate information. Environmental Scientist. This option is intended for students interested in applying knowledge of the atmosphere to diverse interdisciplinary applications, for example, hydrology and snow science; climate system science, air chemistry including health impacts of air pollution, or public policy.

B.S. Learning Outcomes Being Updated Consistent with guidelines of the American Meteorological Society Students who graduate with a BS in Atmospheric Sciences should develop the critical thinking, problem solving, reasoning, analytical, and communication skills that will provide them with the necessary versatility for long-term success as science professionals Specific expected learning outcomes are: Demonstrate understanding of core concepts in the atmospheric sciences involving fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, radiative transfer, and air chemistry Demonstrate how basic understanding of the atmosphere can be applied to diverse interdisciplinary applications Apply measurement principles, numerical and statistical analysis methods, and a high-level structured programming language to investigate atmospheric processes and environmental problems Possess the ability to communicate in both written and oral forms with peer and lay audiences using scientific evidence Apply basic and applied knowledge through completion of a capstone education, research, or work experience Demonstrate understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities expected of scientists Be prepared for higher-level education or to embark on a career with skills adaptable to evolving opportunities in the workforce

Draft Direct-Assessment Outcomes Matrix

Updating Our Undergraduate Online Exit Survey Please rate whether our Department has helped you meet the following Learning Outcomes: Demonstrate understanding of core concepts in the atmospheric sciences involving fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, radiative transfer, and air chemistry …   Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Core concepts

Questions? john.horel@utah.edu

Assessment: Undergraduate Exit Survey 21-question survey with 18 responses out of 22 total BS graduates from 2016-17 How many hours per week did you work in a job while pursuing your degree? How much debt did you accrue while being a student in Atmospheric Sciences?

Program Purpose B.S. To prepare graduates to pursue careers within atmospheric science or other environmental fields while providing a foundation upon which additional education, training, or specialization in science, policy, education, law, or other fields may be pursued. M.S. To prepare students for doctoral research or careers in the atmospheric sciences or other environmental fields that require an advanced education and technical skills or the ability to conduct research typically directed by a senior scientist. Ph.D. To prepare students for careers in the atmospheric and related sciences which require the ability to conduct original research and/or advanced technical analysis and reasoning skills.