Air Quality Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREV AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting presented by Laurence Rouïl.
Advertisements

Regional Air Quality « Regional » : Europe and zoom over some countries. gaz phase (link with GRG) and aerosol (link with.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
GMOS: A GEO Initiative to Support the Global Treaty Nicola Pirrone GMOS: A GEO Initiative to Support the Global Treaty Nicola Pirrone GMOS Coordinator.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
COST ES0602: Towards a European Network on Chemical Weather Forecasting and Information Systems.
TNO experience M. Schaap, R. Timmermans, H. Denier van der Gon, H. Eskes, D. Swart, P. Builtjes On the estimation of emissions from earth observation data.
15 / 05 / 2008 Model ensembles for the simulation of air quality over Europe Robert Vautard Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement And.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting Laurence ROUÏL.
The robustness of the source receptor relationships used in GAINS Hilde Fagerli, EMEP/MSC-W EMEP/MSC-W.
Near Real Time analyzed maps of air quality in Europe Cécile Honoré, Laurence Rouïl.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Atmospheric composition from space: its role in environmental assessment Robert Koelemeijer Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP)
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, Atmospheric Modeling.
Page 1GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 ENSEMBLES. Page 2GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 The ENSEMBLES Project  Began 4 years ago, will end in December 2009  Supported by.
ICP Waters International Cooperative Programme Assessment and Monitoring Effects of Air Pollution on Rivers and Lakes Activities and plans 2014 Gunnar.
1 ESA Noordwijk 20 Jan 2004 Frank Raes, Peter Bergamaschi, Hugh Eva, Alan Belward Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre European.
Modelled results vs. emission estimates S.Dutchak, I.Ilyin, O.Travnikov, O.Rozovskaya, M.Varygina EMEP/MSC-East Modelled results vs. emission estimates.
AGENDA for RSG meeting June 4, Welcoming. Introduction of participants 2. Adoption of the agenda 3. Activities since the RSG meeting in Antalya.
The Euro- and City-Delta model intercomparison exercises P. Thunis, K. Cuvelier Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
WG3, List of participants (1) (EoC-based draft) Name & countryContribution (in-short) A.Miranda, Portugal- air quality modelling in Portugal, urban stress.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Gloream workshop, Paris 2006 Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project : implementation.
Monitoring atmospheric composition using satellite-ground-based synergies P. Ciais (1), C. Textor (1), M. Logan (1), P. Keckhut (2), B. Buchmann (4), S.
10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE1 IES - Institute for Environment and Sustainability Ispra - Italy
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM ENEON Workshop, Paris, September 2015www.wmo.int WMO Networks.
Evaluation and Intercomparison of 2010 Hemispheric CMAQ Simulations Performed in the Context of AQMEII and HTAP C. Hogrefe 1, J. Xing 1, J. Flemming 2,
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Eskes, TROPOMI workshop, Mar 2008 Air Quality Forecasting in Europe Henk Eskes European ensemble forecasts: GEMS and PROMOTE Air Quality forecasts for.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
HARMO13, 1-4June 2010, Paris, France1 Institute for Environment and Sustainability Procedure.
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL AQMEII Phase 2: Overview and WRF/CMAQ Application over North America.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
ARL Contributions to the WMO Atmospheric Deposition Program Richard S. Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016.
Sandro Fuzzi National Research Council Bologna, Italy
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
MERMAID Innovative multi-purpose offshore platforms: planning, Design and operation MERMAID.
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Global Influences on Local Pollution
REanalysis of the TROpospheric chemical
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
The Atmosphere during MOSAiC
Initial thoughts on the benefits of TEMPO data for AQ management
AQMEII3: the EU and NA regional scale program of the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution Task Force The AQMEII 3 modelling team S. Galmarini, C. Hogrefe,
NASA ROSES 2007: Decision Support through Earth Science Research Results Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite.
EFnet: an added value of multi-model simulation
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
Inverse modeling of European sources:
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
M. Schaap + TNO and RIVM teams
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR)
C. Carnevale1, G. Finzi1, E. Pisoni1, P. Thunis2, M. Volta1
Co-operation with TF on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
Assessment of heavy metal pollution within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

Air Quality Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) http://aqmeii.jrc.ec.europa.eu Air Quality Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) S. Galmarini European Commission - Joint Research Center Institute for Environment and Sustainability

Background AQMEII’s foci: Air quality model validation as essential process on model development and improvement Air quality models are important assets of the decision making process on emission regulation and definition of air quality standards AQMEII’s foci: Evaluation of regional scale air quality models Development of a common evaluation framework Bridging North American and European modeling communities Activity supported by JRC-IES, US-EPA, Environment Canada, DG-RTD and DG-ENV May 2009: JRC-IES organizes the Stresa workshop. In depth analysis of the four evaluation streams defined by AQMEII and starting the definition of the a the first activity involving the two communities

What is our confidence in the model predictions? Stresa workshop: Definition of the four model evaluation streams Research gaps within each theme + priorities Preliminary definition of the first practical activity Dynamic Evaluation Can the model capture changes related to meteorological events or variations? Can the model capture changes related to emission reductions? Model-predicted concentration and deposition Model Inputs: meteorology and emissions Chemical transformation: gas, aerosol, and aqueous phases Transport: advection and diffusion Removal: dry and wet deposition Diagnostic Evaluation Are model errors or biases caused by model inputs or by modeled processes? Can we identify the specific modeled process(es) responsible? Are we getting the right answers? Probabilistic Evaluation What is our confidence in the model-predicted values? How do observed concentrations compare within an uncertainty range of model predictions? Operational Evaluation How do the model predicted concentrations compare to observed concentration data? What are the overall temporal or spatial prediction errors or biases? Are we getting the right answers for the right (or wrong) reasons? Can we capture the observed changes in air quality? What is our confidence in the model predictions? Can we identify needed improvements for modeled processes or inputs?

First AQMEII practical activity First phase (2010) : The two continent model evaluation exercise focus operational, diagnostic and probabilistic evaluation Collection of model results for EU and North American continent over a period of 1 year (2006) Collection of model and monitoring data for the case study Organize the information of a central database with the high level of harmonization Exchanging experience on the use of emission inventories produced in NA and EU Spacial analysis of model behavior and evaluation at monitoring stations against measurements Introduction of the vertical dimension as important element of the evaluation => use of vertical profile and MOZAIC data for the two continents

Platform developed in 2000 for emergency response real time ensemble dispersion analysis The facility allows acquisition of model results Real-time on the fly consultation of the sets Client based analysis Hard wired model evaluation tools and parameters Acquisition of point measurements for model vs model analysis Global as well as regional scale coverage M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M.. M22 Other Users DM Community M1 M2 M.. M22

Prototypical use of the ENSEMBLE system (Galmarini et al. 2004, AE) - collection point of the data - client based pre-consultation center - ensemble analysis - guarantee continuous accessibility to information for research and consultation - access initially limited to participants - possibility of open access to validated information (not in the short to medium term)

Across Atlantic AQMEII data organization EAST ATLANTIC data organization Data provider: TNO Data: EU-Emissions Data provider: IPSL Data: EU Meteorology AQMEII Data Depots: EU Emissions: TNO; delivery: FTP EU meteo: IPSL; delivery: hard disk NA meteo (copy from US-EPA); delivery: hard disk WEST ATLANTIC data organization Data provider: US-EPA Data: NA-Emissions NA Meteorology AQMEII Data Depots: NA Emissions: US-EPA; delivery: FTP NA meteo: US-EPA; delivery: hard disk EU meteo (copy from IPSL); delivery: hard disk Data provider: ECMWF-MACC Data: NA Boundary conditions EU Boundary conditions AQMEII Data Depot: METEO France; delivery: FTP Data providers: various sources (see CoC) Monitoring data NA and EU: Ground stations (AQ and meteo) Ozone soundings MOZAIC profile AQMEII Data Depot: JRC-ENSEMBLE; delivery: online consultation

Number of groups per country that have accepted the COC AUSTRIA 1 CANADA 1 SWITZERLAND 1 GERMANY 3 SPAIN 1 FINLAND 1 FRANCE 3 GREECE 1 ITALY 1 NORWAY 1 POLAND 2 UK 2 US 4 Total = 22

Meteorological, air quality, and emission model data expected on: 2D fields on common grid 0.25x0.25 degrees At monitoring sites In the vertical at radio soundings locations In air volumes above specific airport location

Atlanta - 30 Dallas - 124 Montreal - 2 NewYork - 15 Philadelphia - 110 Portland - 142 Toronto - 90 Vancouver – 72 Washington - 62

Standard Acknowledgments statement We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of various groups to the first air Quality Model Evaluation international Initiative (AQMEII) activity. The following agencies have prepared the data sets used in this study: U.S. EPA (North American emissions processing and gridded meteorology); U.S. EPA, Environment Canada, Mexican Secretariat of the Environment and Natural Resources (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales-SEMARNAT) and National Institute of Ecology (Instituto Nacional de Ecología-INE) (North American national emissions inventories); TNO (European emissions processing); Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, IPSL, CEA/CNRS/UVSQ (gridded meteorology for Europe); ECMWF/GEMS project & Météo-France/CNRM-GAME (Chemical boundary conditions). Ambient North American concentration measurements were extracted from Environment Canada's National Atmospheric Chemistry Database (NAtChem) PM database and provided by several U.S. and Canadian agencies (AQS, CAPMoN, CASTNet, IMPROVE, NAPS, SEARCH and STN networks); North American precipitation-chemistry measurements were extracted from NAtChem's precipitation-chemistry data base and were provided by several U.S. and Canadian agencies (CAPMoN, NADP, NBPMN, NSPSN, and REPQ networks); the WMO World Ozone and Ultraviolet Data Centre (WOUDC) and its data-contributing agencies provided North American and European ozonesonde profiles; NASA's AErosol RObotic NETwork (AeroNet) and its data-contributing agencies provided North American and European AOD measurements; the MOZAIC Data Centre and its contributing airlines provided North American and European aircraft takeoff and landing vertical profiles; for European air quality data the following data centers were used: EMEP European Environment Agency/European Topic Center on Air and Climate Change/AirBase provided European air- and precipitation-chemistry data. Data from meteorological station monitoring networks were provided by NOAA and Environment Canada (for the US and Canadian meteorological network data) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) data support section. Joint Research Center Ispra/Institute for Environment and Sustainability provided its ENSEMBLE system for model output harmonization and analyses and evaluation.

Input data available since April 5th, 2010 Data expected between now and June/July 2010 Preliminary analysis and discussion at 2nd AQMEII workshop, Turin, September 2010, in connection with 31st ITM conference Definition of phase two at workshop

Participation still opened: URL: http://aqmeii.jrc.ec.europa.eu or mailto: aqmeii@jrc.ec.europa.eu or/and stefano.galmarini@jrc.ec.europa.eu (co-chair for Europe) Rao.ST@epamail.epa.gov (co-chair for North America)