Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
Advertisements

Summary of Key Results from the 2012/2013 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Undertaken by Premium Research Prepared: July 2013.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL JUNE RESEARCH REPORT - Coordinated by the Department of Planning and Community Development On.
UGA Libraries Compensation Satisfaction Consulting Project Carrie McCleese Starr Daniell.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
Since Who is CSI? Customer Service Intelligence, Inc. has dedicated over 20 years of service to provide you with the necessary tools to become a.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Voice of the Scout General Information Overview January-April 2012.
Independent Dealer Survey Data Analysis. Survey Findings: Summary Independent Dealer readers are primarily CEOs or Owners of dealerships and sell a combination.
0 Resident Assessment Subsystem Overview. 1 Resident Assessment Subsystem (RASS) What is RASS? The RASS survey is a PHA management tool that: Assesses.
1 Example Bank Customer Survey Results Net Promoter Score.
Customer Satisfaction Research Produced for: Raven Housing Trust – November 2012 Presented by Emma Hopkins Customer Satisfaction Research Produced for:
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems
Presented to the SME Member Council December 20,
IAF Certification/ Registration Bodies’ Member Satisfaction Program September 19, 2003 Final Report Summary.
Huntingdonshire District Council Place Survey 2008 Presentation by Sofia Vartsaki mruk research ltd 9 Northburgh Street London EC1V 0AH Tel :
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Presentation to the 2004 ICAI Practice Conference Great Southern Hotel, Killarney 1 April, 2004 Ian Drennan Corporate Compliance Manager.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
 The purpose of the survey was to gather feedback from MMCAP Medical Supplies and Equipment contract users related to:  Experiences and satisfaction.
Customer Service Charter Introduction About SIMWEN A simulated work environment that will enable the student to complete 8 of the 10 units in Certificate.
Camden.gov.uk Camden Business Survey The Results Summary of key findings.
Development Management Customer Satisfaction Survey 2015/16 Economy, Planning and Employability Services Reported Prepared May 2016.
Final Presentation of Survey Results December 8, /8/20141 The.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
PRICE marketing.
Local Points of Contact Webinar
Director, UW-Eau Claire Political Research Institute
Chatham County 2015 Biennial Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Telehealth Survey Update.
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Identify and Meet a Market Need
Leaders Facilitate the Planning Process
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
DirectionFinder® Survey
Who We Have Spoken To In May
Who We Have Spoken To In November
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
City of Foster City Survey Key Findings
Employee Engagement 2018 Example of analysis report
2016 Information Seekers Voice of The Customer
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
2019 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
HUNTERSVILLE FAMILY FITNESS & AQUATICS Where greatness grows.
HFFA Membership Study Results Wave 2
Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis and Planning
Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For
Roadside Summary Report– November 2015
Methodology 327 interviews with Cotati voters
Employee Engagement Defined
Quick Housekeeping Questions Webinar Recording + Slides Webinar Survey
April 14, 2008 Public Presentation EPSB Board Meeting
COIT 20253: Business Intelligence Using Big Data
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
CREATING A STRATEGY FOCUSED ORGANIZATION
Focused General Plan Update Status Report & Visioning Overview
Presentation transcript:

Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents 7/9/2019 Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents Reporting Period: December 2018 Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018 by Quality Solutions, Inc.

City of El Segundo Executive Summary (cont.) Key Findings Methodology Web surveys were conducted with Residents within the City of El Segundo. Respondents were selected from the master survey list supplied by City of El Segundo. A final sample of customers was obtained. We sent 1269 invitations, 221 were undeliverable for a total of 1048 sent out. We had a 24% response rate or 248 total responses. Mail surveys were also sent out from the City of El Segundo offices. A total of 319 residents responded via mail. A total of 557 residents responded to some portion of the survey. There were 542 responses to the Net Promoter Score question. It is very important to note we received feedback from 347 residents last year meaning we received over 55% more respondent feedback than last year! Results The city should be delighted 60% of the respondents have seen improvements in the last year! As we have discussed in the past, Net Promoter Score is a tool to measure customer loyalty and the predictive indicators for customer defection. In case study after case study, companies with higher NPS scores generally are more profitable than their competition. A Net Promoter Score of 57% is very respectable given that secondary research suggests that cities using NPS will score in the range of 23 to 28%. The NPS score did declined by 2% from last year which is negligible. When comparing the results of the 2017 survey with this years results, the numbers hardly changed. Last year the city earned a 59% NPS. The percentage of Promoters declined by 2% whereas the percent of passive increased by 2% this year. This is still a remarkable accomplishment given the more than 55% increase in respondents to this year’s survey. Targeted action plans should also be developed for select companies who make up the Detractor Residents. The detailed responses will be provided as part of this report in a separate file. City Managers are encouraged to examine this raw feedback in more detail. Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018

City of El Segundo Executive Summary (cont.) Key Findings The following areas are viewed as modest strengths by the majority of Residents: (4.00 to 4.33) Availability & Responsiveness of Police Department- Mean Score 4.37 Responsiveness, knowledge and competency of Fire & Paramedic services – Mean Score 4.48 Quality of Recreation and Parks Program offered – Mean Score 4.10 Maintenance and upkeep of Recreation and Parks facilities- Mean Score 4.15 Resources and services provided by the Public Library- Mean Score 4.14 Ideally we would like all of these scores to rise to above 4.33, which would most likely occur if some of the NPS issues with individual Residents were addressed. There are three areas which represent an Issue & Opportunity due to their mean scores coming in below 4.00) Responsiveness and overall vision of City Council Water and Sewer Billing Department Customer Service (complaint handling & responsiveness) Condition of City Infrastructure: streets, sidewalks and public facilities Detractors were most concerned cost of living and taxes. To a lesser extent Detractors are concerned about noise pollution and the airport and the desire for a more resident friendly environment. Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018

City of El Segundo 7/9/2019 by Quality Solutions, Inc. Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018 by Quality Solutions, Inc.

City of El Segundo - Resident Net Promoter Score Promoters 68% - 11% Detractors = NPS of 57% A Net Promoter Score of 57% is very respectable given that secondary research suggests that cities using NPS will score in the range of 23 to 28%. When comparing the results of the 2017 survey with this years results, the numbers hardly changed. Last year the city earned a 59% NPS. The percentage of Detractors declined by 1 % this year. City of El Segundo needs to develop plans to address some of the concerns of the Resident Detractors (Those giving scores of 6 or less). Cost of living and taxes appears to be the primary driver among the Distractors. Some effort should also be made to address some of the concerns of the Passives (scores of 7 & 8). The comments of the individual Detractors and Passives provide specific guidance. Each comment should be reviewed independently. NPS is a customer centric process; meaning that action plans address individual customer concerns. It is important that each of these Residents are contacted for follow-up and attempts made to address their concerns. Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018

City of El Segundo These areas represent significant opportunities for improvement among Detractors. Individual comments follow for Passive and Detractors. Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018

City of El Segundo Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018

City of El Segundo Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018

Comparing last year to this year City of El Segundo Comparing last year to this year 2017 2018 Comments No. of participants 355 557 57% increase in participation Net Promoter Score 59% 57% 2% decline yet 60% of respondents said there was improvement in city services from last year Primary Issue Among Detractors Improve public works and infrastructure 21% Too Expensive / High Taxes 21% Infrastructure declined to 6% this year! Attribute with Highest Score Responsiveness, Knowledge and Competency of Fire and Paramedic services 4.59 Responsiveness, Knowledge and Competency of Fire and Paramedic services 4.48 Attribute with lowest score Responsiveness and overall vision of city council 3.29 Responsiveness and overall vision of city council 3.55 Increase by .26 or 8% improvement over last year Resident Satisfaction Survey 2018