Simulations and experiments of robot swimming stability.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Comparison of ternary TCR-lipid-CD1 complex structures.

Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

Performance of biohybrid actuators and comparison with fully artificial counterparts. Performance of biohybrid actuators and comparison with fully artificial.

Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Demonstration of high-speed and precise actuation.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Velocity of hygrobots. Velocity of hygrobots. (A) The difference between l and lp corresponds to a distance that a hygrobot advances a period. (B) Velocity.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Demonstration of aerial-aquatic locomotion and transition.

Robot design, component fabrication, and assembly.

Impulsive takeoff from the water surface.

Spontaneous locomotion of hygrobots under spatial gradient of humidity

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Biohybrid structural color hydrogel films with autonomic iridescence displaying. Biohybrid structural color hydrogel films with autonomic iridescence displaying.

Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Power-free sterilization of culture plate.

Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.

Entire demonstrations of Scaled Walk-bot and Glider-bot.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Fig. 5 MicroLED array with 3D liquid metal interconnects.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Experimental results for healthy participants.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Cardiomyocytes cultured on microgroove-patterned structural color hydrogel films. Cardiomyocytes cultured on microgroove-patterned structural color hydrogel.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.

The applications of the biohybrid structural color hydrogels in a heart-on-a-chip system. The applications of the biohybrid structural color hydrogels.

Schematic of experimental setup and screen captures from swimming.

Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.

Magnetic actuation of BMRs.

Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed by a single bacterium through a 2-μm gap. Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Fig. 1 Mean swarm response to an oscillating swarm marker.

Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). (A)

Fig. 2 Full-frame images recording the violation of a Bell inequality in four images. Full-frame images recording the violation of a Bell inequality in.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Characterization of the MCs.

Motions of the biohybrid robot powered by the antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Motions of the biohybrid robot powered by the antagonistic.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Fig. 6 WPS imaging of different chemical components in living cells.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Fig. 2 Folding motions of the TCO with strain-softening behavior.

Fig. 4 Reactive MD simulation showing the origins of chemical and physical effects on friction. Reactive MD simulation showing the origins of chemical.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Jetting phase analysis.

The efficiency and mode of motility are controlled by the body plan

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Analysis of experimental results.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Simulations and experiments of robot swimming stability. Simulations and experiments of robot swimming stability. (A) Simulation of the robot center of mass motion when it is driven at 11 Hz. The color scale represents vehicle speed and has units of millimeter per second. The flapping frequency is 11 Hz. (B) Robot center of mass velocity. (C) Robot body rotation. φ, θ, and ψ represent the body yaw, pitch, and roll motion, respectively. (A to C) Results of the same simulation. (D) Composite image of an unstable swimming robot operating at 5 Hz. (E) This robot experiences notable body pitching (14.8°) when it flaps wings at 5 Hz. (F) Composite image of an upright stable robot ascending to the water surface. (G) The robot pitching amplitude reduces to 9.4° when swimming frequency increases to 11 Hz. Scale bars, 1 cm (D to G). (H) Simulation results of wing stroke (α) and pitch (β) amplitude and relative phase (δ) as functions of flapping frequency. (I) Experimental and simulation comparison of robot pitch amplitude as a function of flapping frequency. (J) Experimental and simulation comparison of robot ascent speed as a function of flapping frequency. (H to J) Red and blue colors distinguish regions that are either stable or unstable, respectively. Both experiments and simulations show that the robot is unstable when the flapping frequency is lower than 9 Hz. Yufeng Chen et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaao5619 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works