Quench calculations of the CBM magnet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
Ch 181 Chapter 18 © 2006, B.J. Lieb Some figures electronically reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Giancoli,
Lecture 20 Discussion. [1] A rectangular coil of 150 loops forms a closed circuit with a resistance of 5 and measures 0.2 m wide by 0.1 m deep, as shown.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Induction and Inductance When a bar magnet moves towards the loop, there is a deflection on the ammeter and when the magnet is moved away, there is also.
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
My Chapter 18 Lecture Outline.
Lecture 12 Current & Resistance (2)
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
Ch 181 Chapter 18 Electric Currents © 2002, B.J. Lieb.
 I1I1   R R R I2I2 I3I3 Lecture 11 Current & Resistance.
Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.
Superconducting Fault Current Limiters
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
Chapter 27 Current and Resistance Scalar Sense determined by the movement of the positive charge carrier Average Electric Current Instantaneous Electric.
QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
Chapter 27 Current and Resistance. Electric Current The electric current I is the rate of flow of charge through some region of space The SI unit of current.
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
Upper limits for QPS thresholds for selected 600 A circuits B. Auchmann, D. Rasmussen, A. Verweij with kind help from J. Feuvrier, E. Garde, C. Gilloux,
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
Alain Hervé, ILD Workshop, ILD-T-Coil&Yoke-Parametric-Model-4360, CERN-20 January 2009 Parametric Model for Yoke + Coil ILD Workshop - CERN - 20 January.
TE-MPE –EI, TE - MPE - TM 8/12/2011, Antonopoulou Evelina RQS circuit Simulation results Antonopoulou Evelina December 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,
Jim Kerby Fermilab With many thanks to Vladimir Kashikhin, the FNAL, KEK, and Toshiba teams. SCRF BTR Split Quadrupole ILC ML & SCRF Baseline Technical.
Mutual Inductance Mutual inductance: a changing current in one coil will induce a current in a second coil: And vice versa; note that the constant M, known.
Magnet design and field calculations
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
CBM magnet overview of the BINP work
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
MQY-30 Test Result Report
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Coil design the CBM magnet
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
DOE/SC Status Review of 12 GeV SHMS HB Magnet: Update since Oct 2015
Cryostat design and heat loads
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
Structural analysis of the CBM magnet coil
Preliminary study of HTS option for CEPC detector magnet
Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Electric Charge Electric Charge Rules:
PANDA solenoid quench calculations
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Proposal for new coil design the CBM magnet
Magnet design, field calculations
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Chapter 32 Problems 6,7,9,16,29,30,31,37.
On behalf of the STEAM team
BBQ (BusBar Quench) 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
Presentation transcript:

Quench calculations of the CBM magnet Alexey Bragin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia April 2018 October 2010

Outline Stability questions Quench parameters Quench calculations in BINP Comparisons TDR and BINP calculations Conclusions

Quench parameters Stored energy – 5 MJ Inductance – 21 H Current – 686 A Cold mass of one coil – 1800 kg Cold mass of one winding – 790 kg E/M ratio for two windings – 3.2 kJ/kg SC wire parameters – high Cu/SC ratio and Iop/Icr on the load line ~ 57%

Main parameters of the magnet

Stability of the superconducting winding Stability parameters are The minimal length of the normal zone propagation in a SC wire is , where  - thermal conductivity coefficient of the copper matrix,  - electrical resistivity of the copper, Jc – current density, Тс and То – critical and operation temperature of the wire. = 0.073 m. Minimal energy for the normal zone propagation: , where C - heat capacity [J/(kg*K)], A – cross-section area of the wire, Tav – average temperature of the temperature rise. = 7.9 mJ. October 2010

Uniform dissipation energy in one winding The uniform dissipation of the stored energy in one coil is described in the TDR [1] that is according the current design of the CBM magnet. Heat exchange between the winding and the stainless steel case was not counted. In this case we have: - E/M ratio is about 6.5 kJ/kg; - coil temperature after such uniform quench will be about 90 K; - resistance of one winding after such quench is about 4 Ohm; - characteristic time of the current decay is about 10 s (L/R); - the estimated voltage inside the winding, relating the case when a quench started inside the coils (non-uniform quench), is about 0.7 kV; - the thickness of interlayer insulation is about 0.9 mm, including 0.2 mm of Kapton tape. The breaking voltage of Kapton tape is ~ 20 kV. Neglecting breaking voltage of the rest insulation, we have safety factor at least 20/0.7 = 29 for the breaking voltage.

Quench calculations in BINP Main quench calculations were described in the TDR performed by the team from Joint Institute of Dubna and the team from CIEMAT. These estimations were performed at the following conditions: a) the Matlab code was used for this purpose. The current-inductance dependence is presented on the Fg. which was taken from the TDR works; b) the equations for the two coupled circuits were calculated in this code which are, see Fig. below: c) the starting conditions for solving these equations were the 10 K for the one coil while the other stayed cool and the 40 K for hot wire for the hot-spot calculations. The validity of these conditions is described below. d) while the L1 inductance is dependent of the current the L2 and M inductances should also has some dependence on the current due to presence of the iron yoke. Though in the calculations the fixed values of the latter inductance were used such as L2 = 1.09*10-5 H and M = 1.2*10-2 H. e) the R2(T) resistance of the copper cases was dependent on the temperature. This resistance changes its value from ~ 10-7  to 5*10-6  during a quench. f) The estimated inductance of one pole with ANSYS is about 7*10-7 H. The estimated resistance at  = 8.6*10-8 *m at 273 K for iron is about R = 6.4*10-7 . Anyway the poles were not included in the calculations to escape more complexity. They will make benign effect on the quench behavior characteristics: on voltage, hot-spot temperature and as external energy extractors. g) quench-back effect was not accounted. ; ,

Normal zone propagation The velocity of the normal zone propagation along the wire it will take about 0.67 s for the normal zone to go around one turn of the coil v ~ 7.3 m/s The transverse velocity of the normal zone propagation was calculated in ANSYS v ~ 0.05 m/s - too slow due to thick layer of insulation As a positive moment from this - another coil will be quenched by decreased heat transfer to helium.

Quench with dump resistor, Rd = 2.1 Ohm The TDR calculations The currents behavior during the quench with the dump resistor. The blue is for the magnet, the red is for the copper case, maximal value is ~ 0.2 MA only! The resistive voltage is 250 V. The blue line is for the magnet, the red line is for the hot-spot temperature. It assumed that the dump resistor was switched on after 3 s.

1. Quench of the short circuited magnet, Rd = 0 TDR calculations. The current and the hot spot temperatures are presented here. The blue line is the magnet current, the red line is the copper case current. Its maximal value is 0.14 MA only. The hot spot temperature

2. Quench of the short circuited magnet, Rd = 0 TDR calculations. The voltage and coil resistance are presented here. TDR calculations. The voltage and quenched coil temperature are presented here. The maximal resistive voltage here is ~ 1050 V.

Quench of the short circuited magnet, Rd = 0, R2 >> 10-7  The currents behavior during the quench of the short-circuited magnet and with R2 >> 10-7  than R for the copper case. The temperatures behavior during the quench of the short-circuited magnet and with high R2 value. The blue line is for the magnet, the red line is for the hot-spot temperature. The maximal resistive voltage here is 1242 V.

Total voltage The total voltage (between the SC winding and ground) can be evaluated as shown in this figure. The inductive voltage is distributed uniformly between two coils, so the total voltage is twice less than resistive voltage.

Results These estimations considered energy dissipation in one winding only. In the current design the normal zone will reach the other winding. In ordinary conditions the most part of the stored energy will be extracted on the dump resistor. The average temperature in the quenched coil will be ~ 50 K. The hot-spot temperature will be well below 80 K. The maximal voltage will be between two coils. The calculations of the short-circuited magnet shows the hot-spot temperature about 150 K and the internal voltage around 600 V. The copper cases of the coils have some influence on the quench but not high. The resistance of the copper cases changes by ~ 14 times during a quench. The cylindrical iron poles will also affect the quench behavior but less than the copper cases. In total the CBM magnet coils looks protected from quench effects. Attention should be paid to bus bars insulations especially in the cold mass zone.