CSE 321 Discrete Structures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extensible Networking Platform CSE 240 – Logic and Discrete Mathematics Review: Mathematical Induction Use induction to prove that the sum of the.
Advertisements

Discrete Math Methods of proof 1.
Introduction to Proofs
Induction and recursion
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/31/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/11
CSE 321 Discrete Structures Winter 2008 Lecture 12 Induction.
1 Inference Supplementary Notes Prepared by Raymond Wong Presented by Raymond Wong.
Discrete Structures CS 2800
Introduction to Proofs ch. 1.6, pg. 87,93 Muhammad Arief download dari
Discrete Structures CS 23022
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
Introduction to Proofs
Introduction to Proofs
Methods of Proof. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical theorems. Direct.
CSE 311: Foundations of Computing Fall 2013 Lecture 8: More Proofs.
Section 1.8. Section Summary Proof by Cases Existence Proofs Constructive Nonconstructive Disproof by Counterexample Nonexistence Proofs Uniqueness Proofs.
Methods of Proof Lecture 3: Sep 9. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical.
Section 3.3: Mathematical Induction Mathematical induction is a proof technique that can be used to prove theorems of the form:  n  Z +,P(n) We have.
1 Discrete Structures – CNS2300 Text Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Kenneth H. Rosen (5 th Edition) Chapter 3 The Foundations: Logic and Proof,
CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science March 1, 2012 Prof. Rodger Slides modified from Rosen.
Methods of Proof Dr. Yasir Ali. Proof A (logical) proof of a statement is a finite sequence of statements (called the steps of the proof) leading from.
CSE 321 Discrete Structures Winter 2008 Lecture 5 Rules of Inference.
Inverse, Contrapositive & indirect proofs Sections 6.2/6.3.
22C:19 Discrete Structures Logic and Proof Fall 2014 Sukumar Ghosh.
CSE 311: Foundations of Computing Fall 2013 Lecture 8: Proofs and Set theory.
Introduction to Proofs
Chapter 5. Section 5.1 Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If we can reach.
Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I Lecture 8 Proofs Autumn 2012 CSE
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning: all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2012 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren 1.
Methods of Proof Lecture 4: Sep 20 (chapter 3 of the book, except 3.5 and 3.8)
Section 1.7. Section Summary Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs Proof of the Contrapositive Proof by Contradiction.
Foundations of Computing I CSE 311 Fall Announcements Homework #2 due today – Solutions available (paper format) in front – HW #3 will be posted.
Chapter 5 1. Chapter Summary  Mathematical Induction  Strong Induction  Recursive Definitions  Structural Induction  Recursive Algorithms.
Lecture 2: Proofs and Recursion. Lecture 2-1: Proof Techniques Proof methods : –Inductive reasoning Lecture 2-2 –Deductive reasoning Using counterexample.
Induction (chapter of the book and chapter of the notes)
Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/17
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
Great Theoretical Ideas in Computer Science
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 02/08/17
Direct Proof by Contraposition Direct Proof by Contradiction
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
CSE 311: Foundations of Computing
Chapter 5 Induction and Recursion
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
Discrete Math for CS CMPSC 360 LECTURE 4 Last time and recitations:
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
Induction and recursion
CSE 311: Foundations of Computing
Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 2: Proofs
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
Geometry.
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
Dr. Halimah Alshehri MATH 151 Dr. Halimah Alshehri Dr. Halimah Alshehri.
Induction Rosen 5 Lecture 8: Oct 29, 30.
Introduction to Proofs
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
Agenda Proofs (Konsep Pembuktian) Direct Proofs & Counterexamples
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
Presentation transcript:

CSE 321 Discrete Structures Winter 2008 Lecture 6 Proofs

Announcements Reading for this week Homework 2 Today: 1.6, 1.7 Homework 2 Due Wednesday, January 23 Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Mon., Jan 21  x (UniversityHoliday(x)  NoClass(x)) UniversityHoliday(Monday)

Highlights from Lecture 5 Formal Reasoning Build a proof, starting from hypotheses by applying rules of inference

Proofs Proof methods Direct proof Contrapositive proof Proof by contradiction Proof by equivalence

Direct Proof If n is odd, then n2 is odd Definition n is even if n = 2k for some integer k n is odd if n = 2k+1 for some integer k

Contrapositive Sometimes it is easier to prove  q   p than it is to prove p  q Prove that if ab  n then a  n1/2 or b  n1/2

Proof by contradiction Suppose we want to prove p is true. Assume p is false, and derive a contradiction

Contradiction example Show that at least four of any 22 days must fall on the same day of the week

Equivalence Proof To show p1  p2  p3, we show p1  p2, p2  p3, and p3  p1 Show that the following are equivalent p1: n is even p2: n-1 is odd p3: n2 is even

The Game of Chomp

Theorem: The first player can always win in an n  m game Every position is a forced win for player A or player B (this fact will be used without proof) Any finite length, deterministic game with no ties is a win for player A or player B under optimal play

Proof Consider taking the lower right cell If this is a forced win for A, then done Otherwise, B has a move m that is a forced win for B, so if A started with this move, A would have a forced win

Tiling problems Can an n  n checkerboard be tiled with 2  1 tiles?

8 8 Checkerboard with two corners removed Can an 8  8 checkerboard with upper left and lower right corners removed be tiled with 2  1 tiles?

8 8 Checkerboard with one corner removed Can an 8  8 checkerboard with one corner removed be tiled with 3  1 tiles?