ADJUDICATION OF A RESERVATION OF WATER APPLICATION The Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alaska Department of Natural Resources, DML&W Water Resources Section Putting It All Together Alaska Coastal Management Program Annual Conference April.
Advertisements

Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds (FSWs) Background, Procedures, and the Horsefly River as a candidate A Presentation to the Horsefly River Roundtable (April.
State Adopted Budget Board of Education October 19, 2010 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Business Services/Budget Department Prepared by: Dr. Cathy.
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Briefing to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council April 23, 2014.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
WRIA 43 Phase 3 INSTREAM FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS Building a Watershed Plan with the Functions and Values of the WRIA 43 Planning Unit April 18 th, 2006 Meeting.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Proposed Revisions to the State’s Surface Water Classification System February 22, 2010 Public Workshop Daryll Joyner Bureau of Assessment and Restoration.
Koktuli River Instream Flow Reservation Cathy Flanagan Bristol Bay Native Association.
HOW TO MAKE A CLIMATE GRAPH CLIMATE GRAPHING ASSIGNMENT PT.2.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
A Review of Some Grant-Funded Watershed Projects in Central Illinois: Part II Illinois Lake Management Association Grant Opportunities and Funding Options.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
By: Scott Rakes February 18, 2010 Endangered Species.
Kathy Alexander, Ph.D. Technical Specialist Water Availability Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Date processing and conversion Please use speaker notes for additional information!
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
ODFW Habitat Mitigation Policy and Energy Facility Siting.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. Kodiak NWR – Established ,000 acres On Afognak And Ban Islands Added with ANILCA 1.7 million acres on Kodiak,
NOAA Aviation Safety Board Meeting May 16, 2006 Lieutenant Commander Debora Barr NOAA Aviation Safety Program.
Millbrook Dam Environmental Assessment Study Dan Marinigh CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Otonabee Region Conservation Authority October 20, 2015 Otonabee Conservation.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Water Quality Certification for hydropower licensing in Wisconsin.
NOAA Fisheries Update MAFAC Meeting Paul Doremus DAA for Operations September 23, 2014.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
1 Lisa Hutchinson-Scarbrough Division of Subsistence Alaska Department of Fish and Game Chignik Management Area Subsistence Salmon Fisheries Overview Chignik.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Finance Department Environmental Services
Tillman Creek Acquisition
Long-term Challenges to Alaska’s Salmon Populations Workshop
Precipitation, Streamflow and a Look at Little Bear River Contaminants
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Deep Creek Lake PRB Meeting Budget Update 25 April 2016
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
PART I Give yourself MORE CASH! PART 1 CASH Bonus Incentive JUNE 1-30 Consultants Managers and above PART 1.
Division of Waste Management
Stream Depletion from an Ecological Perspective
Springbrook Estates Sewer Improvement Area Informational Meeting
Environmental Flow Protection in TCEQ Permitting
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Adult Returns and Juvenile Outmigration Data
SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES: FROM POLICY TO IMPLEMENTATION
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
Constructing Climate Graphs
ADJUDICATION OF A RESERVATION OF WATER APPLICATION The Process
Precincts and Polling Places
SETTLEMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO IRE 408
FY 2019 Close Schedule Bi-Weekly Payroll governs close schedule
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Transmission Planning Code Review
A Climate Study of Daily Temperature Change From the Previous Day
Precincts and Polling Places
Case study of Uganik River Reservation of Water within Kodiak NWR
Case study of Uganik River Reservation of Water within Kodiak NWR
Alaska’s Reservation of Water Opportunities: Why Reserve Water? &
Budget Planning Calendar
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Presentation transcript:

ADJUDICATION OF A RESERVATION OF WATER APPLICATION The Process MORE INDEPTH DISCUSSION ABOUT ASPECTS OF THE ADJUDICATION PROCESS

Robert Angell, AK Div. Of Tourism Purpose Protection of fish and wildlife habitat, migration, & propagation; Recreation and park purposes; Navigation and transportation Sanitary and water quality purposes. Robert Angell, AK Div. Of Tourism HAMMER THIS IN! (USGS 1996) (USGS 1996)

THE ‘NEED’ Example from ADF&G applications: “The primary purpose of this proposed reservation is to protect fish habitat, migration, and propagation within XXXX Creek and its watershed. This reach of XXXX Creek has been specified as important to anadromous fish under Alaska state statue AS 16.05.871, as AWC stream number XXX-XX-XXXXX-XXXX by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho salmon (O. kisutch), chum salmon (O. keta), rainbow trout (O. mykiss), and Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) utilize these reaches of the XXXX Creek for a portion of, or all of their spawning, incubation, rearing, and passage life phases. These species contribute to sport and commercial fisheries in the area and provide recreational opportunities' and values as well.” LOTS OF WORDING BUT LOOK AT THE UNDERLINED……DESCRIBE IN DETAILS THE NEED

Additional ADF&G ‘Need’ Example: Sufficient flows are needed to support seasonal uses of riverine habitats by fishes and to provide for fluvial processes that maintain these habitats. To maintain seasonal uses of habitats by each life history stage, we recommend maintaining a flow regime that mimics the magnitude and timing of the natural flow regime as discussed above. This approach is necessary to meet the needs of species’ life history stages that have coevolved and exhibit biological adaptations to the river’s flow regime. HERE IT IS AGAIN….MORE SUPPORTING INFO FOR THE NEED

FWS EXAMPLE FOR ‘NEED’: On August 14, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt established Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) by Executive Order 8857, and on December 2, 1980, President Carter signed into law the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). Section 393 (5)(B) of ANILCA declared the following purposes for which Kodiak NWR is established and shall be managed: “(i) to conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity including, but not limited to, Kodiak brown bears, salmonids, sea otters, sea lions, and other marine mammals and migratory birds; (ii) to fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States with respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats; (iii) to provide in a manner consistent with purposes set forth in subparagraphs (i) and (ii), the opportunity for continued subsistence uses by local residents; and (iv) to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable and in a manner consistent with the purposes set forth in subparagraph (i), water quality and necessary water quantity within the refuge.” Additionally, the water reservation is needed to comply with the legal and management directives (as described previously). The Uganik River is within the external boundary of the Kodiak NWR, where the conservation of aquatic habitat and associated biota through the maintenance of water quantity is mandated by law. In the judgment of USFWS, the proposed reservation is necessary to maintain the habitat that supports a rich and abundant biota within the Uganik River and will aid USFWS in carrying out its management objective to maintain the natural water quantity and quality at stream flows and water levels that will provide suitable habitat for brown bears, fish, migratory waterbirds, raptors, and other wildlife. HIGHLIGHTED THE SPECIFICS AND UNDERLINED ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR NEED

REACH EXAMPLES: Example of an acceptable reach request: Hydrologically distinct Gage is located above any contributing tributaries Does not include any lakes between the start and end point of a reach

Included lakes within & outside the river system EXAMPLE OF WHAT SHOULD NOT BE REQUESTED: Applicant asked for everything within the outlined box on one application Included lakes within & outside the river system Each lake and distinct reach would require separate applications. EACH ARE HYDROLOGICALLY DISTICT

Measuring Stream Discharge USGS stream gaging stations collect discharge (flow) data which are compiled and published. USGS is the most widely used in applications because the data has already been collected. Other forms of discharge measurement allowable as well. Examples: BLM, ADF&G, consultants For data unavailable via online, the full data set/analysis will be required for DNR hydrologists to review. IF ITS UNAVAILABLE FOR US TO READILY ACCESS, WE NEED THE DATA! ADNR USGS

Measuring Water Level Example: X Lake is 10.2 miles long, has a surface elevation of approximately 75 feet above mean sea level, and surface area of approximately 1, 305 hectares. The lake is steep sided with a max depth of 752 feet Requested quantities are lake elevations relative to a reference mark A galvanized expansion bolt, secured into bedrock at the gage site serves as the primary reference mark that lake elevations are measured relative to. The reference mark is assigned an arbitrary elevation of 10 ft. The difference between the reference mark and the vertical distance to the water surface is the lake elevation measured by the gage. WE HAVEN’T ESSENTIALLY DONE A LAKE BEFORE SO THIS IS AN AREA WE WILL HAVE TO NAVIGATE THROUGH…… JUST AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS NEED FOR A LAKE RESERVATION https://www.geocaching.com/mark/details.aspx?PID=QD1860

Examples of Acceptable Time Periods January February March April May June July August September October November December Time Periods January 1-15 January 16-31 February March April May 1-15 May 16-31 June 1-15 June 16-30 July etc… Time periods can be set at seasonal, monthly, or broken out periods. Time periods are not generally acceptable in less than 7 day increments for water management purposes. Time periods should follow the hydrograph.

Flow Requests Applicants can request what they deem is required flow for the purpose checked. The flows must be justified and backed up within the application. Requests are also dependent on prior appropriations, available amounts of unappropriated flows regardless of prior appropriators, and potential future uses. Flows may be adjusted down but will never be adjusted up. Time Period Requested Flow (cfs) Jan 6 Feb 5 Mar Apr 7 May 20 Jun 78 Jul 54 Aug 44 Sep 34 Oct 24 Nov 12 Dec REQUEST WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS REQUIRED FLOWS MUST BE JUSTIFIED PRIOR APPROPRIATORS? UNAAPPROPRIATED FLOWS? FUTURE USES? FLOWS CAN GO DOWN,….NOT UP!

EXAMPLES OF REQUIRED INFORMATION Aka: Physical, biological, water chemistry, and socio-economic aspects/data substantiating the need for and the quantity of water requested for the proposed reservation SHOW YOUR WORK! JUST LIKE IN SCHOOL….. PART OF THE RECORD……JUSTIFY TO DNR, THE PUBLIC, THE COURTS

(colors represent different years) Natural Flow Regime (colors represent different years) Mean ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF JUSTIFYING YOUR NEEDS, AND REQUESTS Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Fish Species Information Example of a Fish Periodicity Table Coho Salmon Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Smolt Passage   XXXX XX Adult Passage Spawning X Incubation Rearing Pink Salmon   SAW THIS PREVIOUSLY…..WE SPOKE ABOUT IT EARLIER WITH THE UGANIK WE WANT TO SEE PASSAGE SPAWNING INCUBATION REARING ANY OTHER PERTANENT STAGES THAT I’M MISSING Robert Angell, AK Div. Of Tourism Lyn Topinka, 2003

Methodology: Many scientific method may be use and will be reviewed by DNR hydrologists for validity. It is up to the applicant to provide the necessary information. Some questions to ponder: What data is already out there? If you only have a few years of data collected, what is your plan for future data collection? How did you analyze the data? What method did you use? Did you go into a discussion about your method used?

Examples of justifying the chosen method of analysis Stream systems with limited data or ungagged data can be used, but must be justified. SOME EXAMPLES OF METHODS: DURATION ANALYSIS TENNANT METHOD – GETTING AWAY FROM THIS SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION UNIT AREA RUN OFF MASS BALANCE AREAS NOT USUALLY DONE/HASN’T BEEN DONE FOR IFRS PHABSIM STREAM STATS – STILL IN BETA VERSION & DNR DISCUSSIONS ANY OTHER EXTENSIVE MODELING FORM

Review: Water Allocations and Flow Discussions Example of Time Period Requests Requested flows are reviewed Prior appropriators are reviewed Discharge data reviewed Notice is issued based on requested flows Flow discussions begin Flows are finalized Time Period Flow Request (cfs) January 13,000 February 11,000 March 10,712 April May June 13,500 July 17,900 August September October November December 15,000  

Agency & Public Notice Notice goes to: Newspapers 11 AAC 93.080 Notice goes to: Newspapers Alaska Online Public Notice System Certified mail to prior appropriators of the same source Those formally requesting notice Land owners Local Governments Post Offices Within 15 days of publication/service of notice, any person may file written comments with ADNR (AS 46.15.133 (a))  

Management Plans/Research Conducted EXAMPLE (Klehini): Northern Southeast Area Plan (ADNR) Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Management Plan Hydrologic Reconnaissance of the Chilkat River Basin, SE Alaska Haines State Forest Management Plan (ADOF) Haines Borough Comprehensive Plan “Special Use” designation? “Management Area” designation?   WHILE OUT TO NOTICE…..WE RESEARCH

Certificate Criteria AS 46.15.145 (c) The commissioner shall issue a certificate reserving the water applied for under this section if the commissioner finds that: The rights of prior appropriators will not be affected by the reservation; The applicant has demonstrated that a need exists for the reservation; There is unappropriated water in the stream or body of water sufficient for the reservation; and The proposed reservation is in the public interest. WE’VE ACCOUNTED FOR PRIORS WE’VE DEMONSTRATED THE NEED THERE IS UNAPPROPRIATED WATERS PUBLIC INTEREST CRITERIA ARE MET IF YOU CAN ANSWER ALL THESE QUESTIONS THOROUGHLY…..CERTIFICATE!

Public Interest Criteria AS 46.15.080 (b) In determining the public interest, DNR considers*: Benefit to the applicant Effects to existing/future economic activity Effect on fish & game resources/public recreational opportunities Effect on public health (water quality) Effect of loss of alternate water uses that might be made within a reasonable time if not precluded or hindered by the proposed appropriation. Harm to other persons Intent/ability of the applicant to complete the appropriation. Effect upon access to navigable or public waters.   YOU WILL KNOW THESE BY HEART FOR A TEST LATER! * These are the minimum 8 statutory criteria which must be considered. Other criteria, as appropriate, may be included.

Final Steps Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, & Decision is written and signed Appeal time – 20 days No appeal: Certificate signed after the 31st day Priority date: legally defensible Applicant now holds the rights to the flows or levels reserved under the certificate. Recording  

10-Year Review A review determines: The purpose/need still applies? Effects of the reservation to prior appropriators/public interest? Has a new beneficial use been proposed? Is new info available about the reservation? Is quantity/level of water reserved adequate? Do time periods still apply? Are additional research/data/analysis needed?   ARE THERE STILL FISH THERE? IS THE PRIOR APPROPRIATOR STILL ABLE TO GET THEIR WATER? IS THE PUBLIC INTEREST STILL FOR THIS PURPOSE? HAS SOMEONE COME IN AND DECLAIRED A HYDROPOWER PROJECT IS MORE PERTINENT? NEW INFO THAT MIGHT CHANGE THE RESERVATION? ARE THE FLOWS STILL GOOD? TIME PERIODS? MAYBE CLIMATE CHANGE HAS SHIFTED THE FLOWS IN DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS? …..

For Further Information Kimberly Sager Statewide Water Reservation Specialist ____________________________________ Department of Natural Resources Water Resources Section 550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1020 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (907) 269-2033 kimberly.sager@alaska.gov   IN CASE YOU STILL DON’T KNOW WHO I AM, OR WHERE I WORK…..HERE YOU GO AGAIN! QUESTIONS?