Preparing P&T dossiers with “punch” My Dossier Quarterly edits Yearly input/feedback Mentoring committee Off-campus mentors Honest criticism Consistent Numbers had to be right Words had to be clear Was not perfect I will share with you the things that people told me they liked and didn’t like about my dossier.

Expectations

Highlights Summary (pg2) 90% Manuscripts Proposals/Grants Presentations R 10% Classroom Training Students T 0% Integrate with appointment Give/Take s

Research- Publications Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research- Publications Updated 9/12/17

Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research- Publications: Be Clear Good: Identified my role in each manuscript and clearly wrote what I did with manuscripts that were not from my program. Bad: It became long-winded, so one clean sentence was enough.

Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research - Awards Updated 9/12/17

Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research – Awards: Identify Impacts Good: Identified my role in each project and clearly wrote numerical impacts & research contributions. Bad: It was a logistical nightmare and it reminded people about the 43 not-funded proposals.

Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research - Presentations Missing a few presentations from students and need to move Extension talks to research presentations Good: Identified each type of presentation and the presenter. Bad: I didn’t identify type of conference (international, national, etc.) and then I lost track of student and collaborator presentations.

Teaching – Mentoring Research Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching – Mentoring Research Title & Diversity of Personnel in Research  Program YEAR

Teaching – Mentoring Research: Be Clear Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching – Mentoring Research: Be Clear Good: My favorite part of the dossier was bragging about my students. Bad: It became hard to keep track of the numbers; it was a logistical nightmare.

Teaching – Classroom Instruction Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching – Classroom Instruction SAIS reports (Student Evaluation) – Appendix Peer evaluation Teaching development Best Practices of Teaching Workshop Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Kickoffs

Service – Make it integrate your appointment Service: Record institutional, disciplinary, and/or professional service Service – Make it integrate your appointment 90% Research Every published manuscript, review 2 manuscripts Never turn down a grant review opportunity 10% Teaching Department committee (GSC) Research & Teaching 3MT competition for graduate students Judge undergraduate research Disciplinary/Professional You already know what is expected in your field

Preparing P&T dossiers with “punch” My Dossier Quarterly edits Yearly input/feedback Consistent Was not perfect Acknowledgements Mentoring committee Fellow faculty Off-campus faculty Students Contact: Plant Biotech 431 RFryxell@utk.edu