Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages (July 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages (March 2000)
The Role of Recently Derived FT Paralogs in Sunflower Domestication
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Spatial Auxin Signaling Controls Leaf Flattening in Arabidopsis
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Control of Organ Size in Plants
Antonio Serrano-Mislata, Katharina Schiessl, Robert Sablowski 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (November 2013)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
A Feedback Mechanism Controlling SCRAMBLED Receptor Accumulation and Cell- Type Pattern in Arabidopsis  Su-Hwan Kwak, John Schiefelbein  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages (September 2005)
Spatiotemporal Brassinosteroid Signaling and Antagonism with Auxin Pattern Stem Cell Dynamics in Arabidopsis Roots  Juthamas Chaiwanon, Zhi-Yong Wang 
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Saikat Mukhopadhyay, Yun Lu, Shai Shaham, Piali Sengupta 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Richard Sibout, Stéphanie Plantegenet, Christian S. Hardtke 
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages (November 2005)
MiR156-Regulated SPL Transcription Factors Define an Endogenous Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana  Jia-Wei Wang, Benjamin Czech, Detlef Weigel 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Activin-βA Signaling Is Required for Zebrafish Fin Regeneration
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Stuart A. Casson, Alistair M. Hetherington  Current Biology 
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
PXY, a Receptor-like Kinase Essential for Maintaining Polarity during Plant Vascular- Tissue Development  Kate Fisher, Simon Turner  Current Biology  Volume.
Bojan Gujas, Carlos Alonso-Blanco, Christian S. Hardtke 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
FT Protein Acts as a Long-Range Signal in Arabidopsis
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Rhamnose-Containing Cell Wall Polymers Suppress Helical Plant Growth Independently of Microtubule Orientation  Adam M. Saffer, Nicholas C. Carpita, Vivian.
Volume 18, Issue 24, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The PHANTASTICA Gene Encodes a MYB Transcription Factor Involved in Growth and Dorsoventrality of Lateral Organs in Antirrhinum  Richard Waites, Harinee.
Nicolas Arnaud, Tom Lawrenson, Lars Østergaard, Robert Sablowski 
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
RNA Sequencing of Stentor Cell Fragments Reveals Transcriptional Changes during Cellular Regeneration  Henning Onsbring, Mahwash Jamy, Thijs J.G. Ettema 
The Chemokine SDF1a Coordinates Tissue Migration through the Spatially Restricted Activation of Cxcr7 and Cxcr4b  Guillaume Valentin, Petra Haas, Darren.
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Gibberellin Signaling Controls Cell Proliferation Rate in Arabidopsis
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Patterns of Stem Cell Divisions Contribute to Plant Longevity
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Variation in the Dorsal Gradient Distribution Is a Source for Modified Scaling of Germ Layers in Drosophila  Juan Sebastian Chahda, Rui Sousa-Neves, Claudia Mieko.
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 24, Pages (December 2008)
Doris Wagner, Elliot M. Meyerowitz  Current Biology 
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Arabidopsis PLETHORA Transcription Factors Control Phyllotaxis
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 903-909 (April 2016) The INDETERMINATE DOMAIN Protein BROAD LEAF1 Limits Barley Leaf Width by Restricting Lateral Proliferation  Moritz Jöst, Götz Hensel, Christian Kappel, Arnis Druka, Adrien Sicard, Uwe Hohmann, Sebastian Beier, Axel Himmelbach, Robbie Waugh, Jochen Kumlehn, Nils Stein, Michael Lenhard  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 903-909 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.047 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Phenotype of the blf1-1 Mutant (A–D) Three-week-old Bonus (A and C) and blf1-1 plants (B and D) photographed from above (A and B) or from the side (C and D). (E) Mature leaf 3 blades from blf1-1, the blf1-1 introgression line BW58, two blf1 TILLING lines, and their respective background cultivars Bonus, Bowman (Bow), and Barke. (F and G) Cross sections of the third mature leaf blade from Bonus (F) and blf1-1 (G) at 50% leaf length. Arrowheads mark the midvein. Scale bars represent 10 cm in (A)–(E) and 0.5 mm in (F) and (G). See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 903-909DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.047) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Quantification of Leaf Width and Meristem Size (A) Leaf-width profiles of mature leaf 3 blades. Open symbols represent Bonus; closed symbols represent blf1-1 mutants throughout (A–H). (B–G) Leaf-width profiles of leaves 4–9/plastochron stages 6–1 (L4/P6 to L9/P1) at 7 days after germination. Dashed lines indicate the average length of the corresponding Bonus leaves; dotted lines indicate the average length of the blf1-1 leaves. Average leaf lengths between the genotypes were not significantly different based on Student’s t test at any stage. (H) Average cross section area from shoot apical meristems (SAM) at 7 days after germination. Values are mean ± SEM from ten plants. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 903-909DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.047) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Identification of BLF1 (A) Mapping summary. Green numbers are recombinant chromosomes for the respective markers. The sequenced FPCs and genes tested for absence/presence are in blue. Genes deleted in blf1-1 are in red. (B) Gene and protein structure of BLF1 with mutant alleles and predicted effects. For the gene, boxes show exons, lines show introns, and dashed lines are UTRs. (C) Maximum blade width of leaf 3 from blf1 mutant alleles. Values are mean ± SD from ≥12 plants. (D) Expression level of BLF1 in leaves of different stages at 7 days after germination. The leaf 4 sample also includes the next younger leaves and the meristem. Values are mean ± SEM from three biological replicates. The scale bars represent 1 mm (left), 1 cm (middle), and 10 cm (right). (E) Maximum blade width of leaf 3 from BLF1 transformants (BLF1TG) and BLF1-vYFP transformants (BLF1-vYFP) relative to the non-transgenic blf1-1 siblings from the same family. F2GPxBo are plants from the BC2F2 used for transformation. Values are mean ± SEM from greater than or equal to five plants. Percent decrease in width of plants carrying the BLF1 allele relative to the respective blf1-1 mutant control is shown. (F) Transcript levels of BLF1 gene relative to the housekeeping gene ADP in meristems and young leaf primordia of BLF1-containing genotypes in (E) as determined by qRT-PCR. WT indicates BLF1 plants from the BC2F2 population. Two biological replicates were analyzed. Asterisks indicate significant differences after Student’s t test at p < 0.05 (∗), p < 0.01 (∗∗), and p < 0.001 (∗∗∗). See also Figures S3 and S4. Current Biology 2016 26, 903-909DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.047) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Expression Pattern of BLF1 Confocal images from pBLF1::BLF1-vYFP expressing blf1-1 mutants. Green channel: vYFP signal; red channel: FM4-64 staining. The scale bars represent 50 μm. A non-transgenic control is shown in Figure S4. (A) 3D projection of dissected shoot apex. The meristem (asterisk), P2, and P3 primordia are indicated. (B) Optical section of (A) to the left of the meristem, indicating BLF1-vYFP expression in the epidermis and subepidermal cells of P2 and P3 (arrowhead). (C) Dissected shoot apex. BLF1-vYFP is expressed throughout the meristem (asterisks), at the bases of P2 and P3 (arrowhead), and toward the tip of P3. (D) Dissected shoot apex. BLF1-vYFP expression is weaker in P1 than in the meristem (asterisk). (E and F) Dissected inflorescence meristems. BLF1-vYFP is expressed above and below developing spikelet primordia (arrowheads). Asterisk in (E) indicates inflorescence meristem. (G and H) Young ∼1.5-mm-long P5/P6 leaf primordium. BLF1-vYFP is expressed at low levels throughout the epidermis with a stronger signal along developing veins. (I) Optical section through putative developing vein. BLF1-vYFP expression is seen in the epidermis and within developing vein tissue (arrowhead). See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2016 26, 903-909DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.047) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions