[Practice Name Here] [Tax ID# Here]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Advertisements

Nevada Medicaid EHR Incentive Program – FAQ for Ambulatory Setting
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Professionals Overview.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
The Auditing Process: Lessons Learned Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program July 23, 2015.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Susan Clark, BS, RHIT, CHTS-IM, CHTS-PW HIT Solutions Executive, eHealthcare Consulting Meaningful Use And The.
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
Employers/Individuals and Personal Support Workers (PSWs) Transition to Oregon’s new Financial Management Agent Services (FMAS) Filling out necessary.
Alternate Payment Model (APM) WHAT IS AN APM? Alternate Payment Model (APM) Medicare’s new approach to payments for medical care, incentivizing quality.
MACRA and Physician Reimbursement
Risk Assessment Beginning an Analysis Date by Jim Bowman.
EHR Coding and Reimbursement
3.a.iii Medication Adherence Program (MAP)
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
Getting to Know Your Reporting Options for 2017
MACRA UPDATE Presented by Judella Haddad-Lacle MD
Quality Reporting in a MACRA World
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #9 – Secure Electronic Messaging Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s.
Quality Reporting Office Hours
Alternative Payment Models in the Quality Payment Program
Quality Payment Program Updates
Advancing Care Information
CRAM Quarterly Meeting, December 2016
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
the BroncoSERV Database: Faculty Guide
Submitting a New IRB Protocol
Quality Reporting Office Hours
Oregon’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
Quality Reporting Office Hours
Macra/mips: Advancing clinical information
Introduction to the Quality Payment Program & MIPS
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #2 – Clinical Decision Support Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 7, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Bereavement Best Practice.
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Quality Payment Program Robin Huffman & Kelly Fountain The information contained in this presentation is for general information purposes only. The.
MIPS in a deep dive JAMES R. CHRISTINA, DPM October 1, 2015
AQI Vendor Webinar January 24, 2018
Free Trade Agreements - Supplier Training
An Overview of CMS’s Quality Payment Program Reporting Requirements
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Death, Taxes and Meaningful Use Audits
The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research
Bethany Dumond and Rachel DeSantis June 2017
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Submitting a New IRB Protocol
Accessing Reports User Guide
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Healthcare Technology Network of Greater Washington MACRA, MIPS Update
Mid East Toronto Health Link
OCC Fall Users’ Group Meeting MIPS/MU
Making the completion of the Tax Professional Logbook Easy
2019 Improvement Activities
WYOMING MEDICAID PCMH Summit January 24, 2019
Payment Policy Updates Fall 2019
MIPS Reporting - Quality
Clinical Decision Support (CDS): Meeting the Meaningful Use Measures Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program May 14, 2019 & May 20, 2019.
[Group Name].
2019 MIPS Cost Performance Category
2019 MIPS Promoting Interoperability
Research Billing Compliance University of Iowa Health Care
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
New Faculty Orientation
Presentation transcript:

[Practice Name Here] [Tax ID# Here] ACO Logo Here

Automated API Submission ACO MACRA Roadmap Coordination, management, education for Community Clinics MACRA Concierge At year end, we hold several virtual meetings with each practice to educate on MIPS, then obtain, optimize and actually submit their PI data. Our sharable dashboard tracks progress across all TINs, while updating overall ACO performance score. As a result, we will be provide excellent advance predictions of your expected MIPS financial adjustments. Automated API Submission Throughout this process, you will have access to a MACRA concierge, knowledgeable in all relevant CMS regulations, and dedicated to optimizing your MACRA scores. Higher MACRA scores = Higher Medicare Revenues!

Year-End PI Data Acquisition 2018 PI measures are the same as 2017 ACI measures. You will not need to log into QPP or do any other submission activities. You will need to provide us with data from your Certified EHR – and every Certified EHR has the capability to generate this data. Your reports should be provided at the individual physician level where possible. We will perform the group level aggregation, and automatically submit your PI Data. Most common data formats are: QRDA-3 (probably new since last year, but we find that very many EHRs have this. It is the easiest, quickest, and most accurate method) CSV or Spreadsheet report (The spreadsheet must contain, for each physician, each measure with its numerator and denominator values). PDF or Scanned Paper (While rare, we occasionally have to work with paper / PDF reports from your system. In the event you cannot generate QRDA-3 or CSV, we will use your reports to manually enter data into our system, and prepare your data for automated submission.) Your MACRA Concierge will be available at any time to help with PI Data reporting, analysis and even in suggesting actions based on the data we receive. If you don’t know how to get reports from your EHR, or if the reports you are getting are inadequate, we will work together with you and your vendor to retrieve the necessary data.

CPIA and CQM Data Acquisition CPIA: For most ACO’s, CPIA is not necessary. In the event you need them, MACRA Monitor will help manage your CPIA selections. Once you have documented these selections, we will automatically submit them. Your Concierge will provide the appropriate guidance to you. CQM: There is no need for you to submit CQM data for 2017, since the ACO will calculate and submit CQMs based on your claims history. Starting in April of 2019, we will provide an option for monthly analysis of CQMs, using data from your EHR. We will provide more information on this process at that time. Your MACRA Concierge will be available at any time to help with CPIA and CQM Data reporting, analysis and even in suggesting actions based on the data we receive. If you don’t know how to get reports from your EHR, we will work together with you and your vendor.

Yes / No Assertions Note that not all data required for success under MACRA will come from your EHR and/or Registry vendors. The following list contains your assertion of compliance with these items. Please initial asserting each of the following yes/no Attestations that indicate your agreement: ______ We have completed a Security Risk Assessment completed in Calendar Year 2018 ______ We agree to Prevention of Information Blocking Attestation ______ We agree to ONC Direct Review Attestation ______ We are actively engaged with or submitting Immunization Data ______ We are actively engaged with or submitting Syndromic Surveillance Data ______ We are actively engaged with or submitting Specialized Registry Data Please print this page, scan, initial the relevant attestation, and submit to your Concierge

Attestation Authorization Signature As a Health IT Vendor defined in the MACRA regulations, C3 Partners / MACRA Monitor submits MIPS data to CMS in conjunction with your staff, CMS requires that we obtain your written permission to do so. In order to automate your submission, we follow “registry” submission guidelines. These guidelines allow us to submit data without your need to log into QPP / EIDM. For practices choosing the MIPS Individual Reporting Option, this consent must be signed by all MIPS eligible clinicians for whom Individual submission is being done. For practices who opt for the MIPS Group Reporting Option (almost all ACO members), this consent may be signed by a proxy. The proxy will assume the responsibility to provide MACRA Monitor with a roster of Individual NPIs linked to the practice TIN. The proxy agrees to inform the applicable clinicians in the TIN that their MIPS data is being submitted to CMS on their behalf by our Qualified Registry, using the MIPS Group Reporting Option. Random documentation audit on CQM Submissions: If we are submitting CQM data on your behalf, some of your providers may be required to provide data that can be used to validate the CQM calculations. Please note that no PHI is required or accessed, unless a provider is selected for random audit. We are required to select 3% of all TIN/NPI combinations we submit (across our entire client base) for random documentation validation. If a provider is selected for random audit, we will require at least 25% of the selected provider’s patient encounters, in a standard data from your EHR on provider, patient and clinical activity. Any such data will be at the patient level, but can be de-identified. The intent of this audit is to verify that sufficient documentation exists to support reported measures, and will not result in any reporting to CMS. No measure values will be updated as a result of this audit. The undersigned authorizes C3 Partners, LLC to attest MIPS data (ACI, CPIA and CQM data as applicable) to CMS as a surrogate or proxy, and agrees to provide patient and clinical documentation supporting quality measures, in the event a provider is selected for random documentation audit. Organization Signature Printed Contact Name Date _______________________________ ________________________ ________________________________ _____________ Please print this page, scan, sign, date, and submit to your Concierge