CSUDH Writing intensive (WI) policy survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
Advertisements

MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:
Writing Across the Curriculum Pilot Project – DABCC Susan Wood.
University Plan for the Assessment of Student Learning Spring 2006 Revisions Include: -Addition of Graduate School Learning Goals -Incorporation of recommendations.
Outcomes Assessment Forum October 23, 2009 Queens College Steve Schwarz, Office of the Provost Eva Fernandez, CTL Dean Savage, Dept. of Sociology.
Using the ETS Criterion Online Writing System to Enhance and Assess Learner-Centered Writing Proficiency Robert Ussery, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Academic.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Writing Across the Curriculum “Writing to Learn” Criteria: – Substantial writing – Multiple assignments – Revision of work – Critical feedback.
Writing at Doane College: a Workshop David Smit Department of English Kansas State University.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: English, Graduate Chair: Jennifer Haytock Date of Presentation: 1 October 2013.
Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.
Improving the Teaching of Academic Genres in High-Enrollment Courses across Disciplines: A Three-Year Reiterative Study Chris Thaiss University of California,
We’ve set SAILS: Launching Library Assessment Across University Waters Auburn University Libraries Steering the Course Life Saving Support Thar Be Dragons.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Prerequisites and Content Review ASCCC Curriculum Committee July 2011.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy John Stanskas, ASCCC Secretary.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Liberal Studies Update Deans and Department Chairs Meeting, April 4, 2016.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy Pre-Conference Session John Stanskas, ASCCC.
Composition Program Orientation New Common Syllabus Project Ellen Barton Director of Composition
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Existing Situation The course COMP 915 (Technical Communication in Computer Science, 1 hour) is currently a requirement for obtaining a PhD in computer.
Academic Program Review
Making assessment in PhD programs more useful for faculty and students
Early Childhood Education
Where the CBA Meets Curriculum
Rewriting an Internship Program
Heidi Manning, Susan Larson and Bethany Leraas
UNIVERSITY 101: Curriculum and GE
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Learning Assistance Department
Pennsylvania Standards & Common Core
Senate and Union Purview
The 2017 Survey of CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICERS
Jumping on the QM Bandwagon
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students?
June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.
Online Teaching Conference
Commingling Two WAC Programs
Assessment feedback: More modality matters Michael Henderson,
Raymond J. Wlodkowski, Ph.D.
Kennedy-King College’s Assessment Academy Project Report
Parent Forum – Elementary Report Card
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
The BVSD Curriculum Essentials Document
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Online Instruction Implementation and pedagogical dimensions of online instruction within the context of purpose William C. Rivenbark Professor and MPA.
Prerequisites and Content Review
Assessment Day 2018 New Student Experience
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
به نام خدا ارزشيابی برنامه درسی
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Where Do We Grow from Here?
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
Academic Freedom & Standards Committee
Chair: Nadine Jennings Date of Presentation: January 19, 2017
University Faculty Senate
Navigating the College Culture
WAC & English Language Learners
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Presentation transcript:

CSUDH Writing intensive (WI) policy survey University writing committee (UWC) Faculty forums: March 7 & 13, 2019

Why revise the wi policy? Existing policy at CSUDH 2 course graduation requirement WI policy is currently NOT implementable Not all departments offer WI courses Instrumentalist Impact on students Intensive, discipline-based writing instruction WI course coding National norms and standards in higher ed

WI Policy faculty survey History Development Survey launched Fall 2018

Survey Response 156 respondents 150 completed surveys Hundreds of additional detailed comments

Survey results: should csudh have a wi requirement? The vast majority of respondents favor maintaining a WI graduation requirement 57% favor 2-course WI requirement 31% favor more than 2 course WI requirement

Comments: should csudh have a wi requirement? Virtually all respondents indicated the importance of writing and sustained writing instruction across all of the years of a student’s academic career Many faculty members expressed concern about the quality of student writing and the need for a WI requirement that can help address students’ needs systematically Numerous comments indicated that a preferable model would require students to take a WI course in GE and a second upper division WI course in the major Numerous respondents also expressed the need for more writing and writing instruction in nearly all courses— not just WI courses—in order to provide students with the skills and experience they need to become competent, successful disciplinary writers

Survey results: Prereqs to WI courses Virtually all respondents (more than 90%) believe satisfaction of the lower division GE written communication requirement (ENG 110, ENG 112, or ENG 108-109) should be a prerequisite to WI courses

Survey results: lower division wi courses The majority of respondents (more than 70%) favor allowing lower division WI courses in the major with lesser requirements for the number of pages produced (65%)

Survey results: WI course caps The vast majority of faculty (more than 97%) believe that WI courses with one instructor of record should be capped at no more than 25 students Even if WI instructors and students are supported by a GTA or embedded tutor, the majority of respondents (65%) still believe WI courses should be capped at no more than 25 students

Survey results: types & number of assignments Respondents indicated that many different assignments, genres, and modes of writing should “count” toward the total number of pages required in a WI course, with genres/types/modes of accepted writing tied to disciplinary conventions and expectations More than 93% of respondents agree that WI policy should allow multiple short writing assignments to be combined into a longer paper or project in WI designated courses

Survey results: Feedback & assessment More than 87% of respondents believe that instructor feedback and revision should be required on at least 50% of the total required pages produced in a WI course with at least one required rough draft per assignment The majority of respondents (81%) agreed that WI courses should require the use of a rubric to assess student writing

Survey results: portfolio methodology More than 80% of respondents indicated they would be likely to use portfolio methodology in a WI course if they received training in portfolio teaching Conversely, more than 62% of respondents indicated they would be unlikely to use portfolio methodology in the absence of such training

Alternative models Writing-Enriched Curriculum (WEC) Infuses significant, discipline-specific writing experiences in both lower- and upper division courses throughout the curriculum WI Requirement & Writing Pedagogy Include more specific requirements or stipulations regarding the discipline-based teaching (versus assigning) of writing

Q & A Your questions? Additional feedback or commentary Next steps

Wi policy Survey: Drawing winners! Melissa Chan: $100 Amazon gift card Ed Curammeng: $50 Amazon gift card Doreen Delgado: $50 gift card to the DH Bookstore Kari Pederson: $25 Starbucks gift card Hyo Joon Chang: $25 Starbucks gift card Bin Tang: $25 Starbucks gift card

Thank you for participating in the UWC faculty forums! Contact: Siskanna Naynaha, UWC Chair & WAC Coordinator LIB 5506 x3359 snaynaha@csudh.edu