NYC Family Meeting; Updates for Self-Direction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jeff Grosvenor, Interim Director
Advertisements

The Department of Medical Assistance Services Barbara R. Seymour, BSW, HCCS 1.
Healthy Indiana Plan Hoosier Innovation: Health Savings Accounts 1992: Hoosier pioneers medical savings accounts 2003: Tax advantaged HSAs authorized.
Self Direction and the MA DDS Participant Directed Program Building a Home Conference Sept. 29, 2012 Tara Himmel & Greg Carey.
1 CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC COMPETENTCY ON THE US/MEXICO BORDER Esteban Zubia.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
A webinar hosted by the New Hampshire Transition Community of Practice Professional Development Workgroup and UNH Institute on Disability Facilitated by.
June 4, Systems Change Grants: 2001 Real Choice & 2003 Independence Plus Presenters: Keith Jones, RCCPIG Co-Chair & Erin Barrett, Project Director.
Comprehensive Regulatory Revision Office of Developmental Programs.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Steps to Living a Self Determined Life Barbara McNamara Broker, Staff Trainer, PCP Professional.
CalPERS Benefits and Resources Designed for BAM. Agenda Website tips Regional Offices CalPERS Retirement Additional Information & Resources.
Family Resource and Youth Services Centers: A Brief Overview.
1.  Overview of the HCBS Settings Final Rule  Implementation Requirements for States  Arkansas’s Transition Process 2.
Regional Center Services for Consumers with Developmental Disabilities James F. Huyck Public Benefits Consultant/Advocate (916)
Child and Youth Services
The Enhanced AMS 2.0: The Foundation.
Upcoming Changes in Dane County system
Student Equity Report
A National Analysis Of Medicaid Home And Community Based Services (HCBS) Waivers For People With Intellectual And Developmental Disabilities Carli Friedman,
Business System Development
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 8th Public Meeting
Upcoming Changes in Dane County System
High School Application Process School Year
Mini-Grant Web-meeting
Person Served Satisfaction Survey 2009 Employment Services
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
FPG Child Development Institute
Updates for Self-Direction
The Importance of Listening to Timeline of Inclusion at SU
2017 NYSACRA/NYSRA Leadership Conference November 30, 2017
Chesapeake Bay Program Office and Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Recommendations for an Early Childhood Suspension and Expulsion Policy
Office of Developmental Programs Quality Assessment & Improvement for HCBS Services SELF ASSESSMENTS June 23, 2017  11:00 AM June 26, 2017  1:00 PM.
Coordinated Assessment System (CAS): Update
Understanding APD Services
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Working with Transitioning Youth
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Developmental Disabilities Program
Presented by: Community Planning & Advocacy Council.
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
Local Control and Accountability Plan Committee
Sel in ymca afterschool project results
CAS Implementation Update
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
A Share in the Future – Indigenous Education Strategy
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
OPWDD Accomplishments 2016
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Income Eligible Re-Procurement
1915(i)& (k) Implementation Update
FC 335 Safe and Supportive Schools Competitive Grant Webinar
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Thank you for your Patience
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
Susan McDowell Chief Executive Officer, LifeWorks Austin Texas.
The Process for Final Approval: Ongoing Monitoring
New York State Education Department Rate Setting Update
Assessing Administrative and Educational Support Services
Dana Williamson, Director Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
Regional Center of Orange County 2012 Performance Contract
What Is the Self-Study Instructional Audit?
Who Are We? United 4 Children (Birth –18) Child Day Care Association
ODP Updates The Provider Alliance May 31, 2019.
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

NYC Family Meeting; Updates for Self-Direction

Agenda: Growth of SD Understanding the people who choose self-direction Identifying challenges and areas for improvement ASD Technical Assistance recommendations Question and Answer Session

Self Direction Updates FI fee change New Fiscal Intermediary (FI) agency in downstate region Webinars from ASD technical assistance completed in early summer

7/12/2019

7/12/2019 * *

Demographic Data

People Self-Directing Compared to Others in Traditional Services 7/12/2019 People Self-Directing Compared to Others in Traditional Services Compared those who self direct (SD) their services to those who do not self direct their services Approximately 5,000 people in SD group and 91,000 people in non-SD group Analyzed: DDP2 Health, Behavior, and Adaptive Scores Level of Functioning Age Groups

Health, Behavior, and Adaptive Score Comparisons 7/12/2019 Health, Behavior, and Adaptive Score Comparisons Overall, adaptive and health scores were similar between the SD and non-SD groups. Behavior scores were higher in the SD than in the non-SD group. Average score of 51.5 versus 39.0, respectively. Higher adaptive, health, and behavior score indicate more need

Adaptive, Behavior and Health Scores SD vs. Non-SD groups 7/12/2019 Adaptive, Behavior and Health Scores SD vs. Non-SD groups   SD Group Average Non-SD Group Adaptive Score 186.8 189.6 Behavior Score 51.5 39.0 Health Score 5.3 5.4

7/12/2019 Level of Functioning The SD and non-SD groups had similar proportions of people with mild and moderate impairment functional levels. Over twice the proportion of individuals in the SD group have normal or above functional levels compared with the non-SD group. Higher proportions of individuals in the non-SD group have severe or profound impairment functional levels compared with the SD group.

7/12/2019

7/12/2019 SD vs. Non-SD – Age Overall, the SD group is younger than the non-SD group. The average age of the SD group is 25 years old compared to 37 years old for the non-SD group.

7/12/2019

Comparison of SD and non-SD by Age group 7/12/2019 Comparison of SD and non-SD by Age group Sought to establish if differences in adaptive, behavior, and health scores, as well as level of functioning exist by age group. Compared those aged 0 to 21 and those aged 22+.

Adaptive, Behavior and Health Scores SD vs. Non-SD by Age Group 7/12/2019 Adaptive, Behavior and Health Scores SD vs. Non-SD by Age Group   Age 0-21 Age 22+ Self-Directing Average Not Self-Directing Average Adaptive Score 233.3 238.8 153.8 174.6 Behavior Score 70.7 49.4 38.2 35.8 Health Score 5.0 3.8 5.5 5.8

7/12/2019

7/12/2019

What might this data be telling us? People who self-direct their services look comparable to those served in our larger system. Self-direction may offer better options for people who present behavioral challenges. Families and people who are transitioning into adult services are taking advantage of the option to self-direct their services at a higher rate.

Recommendations from Applied Self-Direction In Fall of 2016, OPWDD requested technical assistance for its Self-Direction service from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS). CMS asked an experienced firm, Applied Self-Direction (ASD), to assess OPWDD’s Self-Direction program and provide recommendations for improvement. ASD reviewed extensive material, conducted multiple interviews and reflected on feedback from focus groups involving Self-Direction participants, parents, Support Brokers, Fiscal Intermediaries (FIs) and OPWDD Regional staff. ASD shared their findings and recommendations in Webinars that are available for viewing. The following information is a summary of those recommendations

Recommendations from Applied Self-Direction ASD Recommendation #1: Improvements in Support Broker Training to increase availability of support broker training and move portions of required trainings online. ASD Recommendation #2: Carefully transition away from Independent Support Brokers

Recommendations from Applied Self-Direction ASD Recommendation #3: Replace Individualized Goods and Services (IDGS) categories with a statement that Goods and Services must be directly related to the meeting the individual’s goals in the context of their disability and define what is not allowable. ASD Recommendation #4: Develop an all-encompassing service for self-hired staff, instead of using Community Habilitation, Supported Employment and Respite

Recommendations from Applied Self-Direction ASD Recommendation #5: Modify requirement for the number of Support Broker Circle of Support Meetings to be based on need, instead of four per year ASD Recommendation #6: Move final approval of Self-Direction (SD) Budgets from OPWDD Central Office to OPWDD Regional Offices

Recommendations from Applied Self-Direction ASD Recommendation #7: Move away from a 100% review of all SD plans at the Central Office level. For example, Central Office could do 10 to 25% of the reviews of Self-Direction (SD) Budgets. ASD Recommendation #8: Carefully move forward towards implementing a software solution

Activities Underway to Address Recommendations: Improved Broker training with more online training under development Streamlined approval processes Planning to implement changes that will increase Broker accountability Subcommittee proposed workgroup to look at FI consistency Implementing desk audits to review compliance/quality issues

Question and Answer Session Focus on questions submitted by participants