Update on the Online Conversion Process for CC.net and GOLD: Implications for OSEP Reporting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Advertisements

Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Target Setting for Child Outcomes Conference Call October 30,
Promoting Quality Child Outcomes Data Donna Spiker, Lauren Barton, Cornelia Taylor, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center at SRI International Presented at: International.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
State Directors Conference Boise, ID, March 4, 2013 Cesar D’Agord Regional Resource Center Program WRRC – Western Region.
Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.
Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicators C-3 and B-7) Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San.
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
Considerations for Establishing Baseline and Setting Targets for Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, Lynne Kahn, Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 16,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4) Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Christina.
PRT Determinations & Public Reporting Adria Bace & Amy Bunnell, NDE Barb Jackson, UNMC-MMI.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &
Module 5 Understanding the Age-Expected Child Development, Developmental Trajectories and Progress Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires.
Looking for Patterns in Child Outcome Data – Examples from NYS New York State Department of Health Bureau of Early Intervention.
1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
PREVIEW: STATE CHILD OUTCOMES DATA QUALITY PROFILES National Webinar February 2014.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Maryland’s Approach to Converting Preschool Outcomes Data to OSEP Reporting Categories Nancy M. Vorobey, M.Ed. Maryland State Department of Education
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Critical Markers of High Quality Child Outcomes Data ECO Advisory Board March, 2012.
Summary Statements. The problem... Progress data included –5 progress categories –For each of 3 outcomes –Total of 15 numbers reported each year Too many.
What the data can tell us: Evidence, Inference, Action! 1 Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Considerations Related to Setting Targets for Child Outcomes.
Update on the Online Conversion Process for AEPSi: Implications for OSEP Reporting.
Strategies for Maintaining Data Quality Using Commercial Assessment Systems Nick Ortiz Colorado Department of Education Barb Jackson University of Nebraska.
Child Outcomes Measurement Tools & Process A story of 3 conversions.
Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories NECTAC.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Update on the Online Conversion Process for AEPSi:
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Update on the Online Conversion Process for CC.net and GOLD:
Webinar for the Massachusetts ICC Retreat October 3, 2012
The Basics of Quality Data and Target Setting
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
History of work between ODE and ECO
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Gathering Input for the Summary Statements
Target Setting for Child Outcomes
Kathy Hebbeler, Lynne Kahn, Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

Update on the Online Conversion Process for CC.net and GOLD: Implications for OSEP Reporting

Rationale States using 7-point online conversions noted a larger than expected proportion of typically developing children. Expert practitioners (Nebraska) chart review demonstrated that some of the children who were rated a 6 or 7 were performing below what would be considers typical development for their age. Discussions with Teaching Strategies to review the analyses for the cut-scores for the 7 point scale.

Conversion Process: Partnership with Teaching Strategies and ECO Reviewed the original conversion process Developed a set of methods to revise and validate a new process

Details of the Analysis Process Children with and without disabilities were used in the sample (from original research) Assessment data was used to estimate age expected functioning The age expected performance was used to benchmark either the 7 or 9 points along a range of typical development for each age band

Analysis Process: Continued A sample of children with disabilities performance was compared to the benchmarks Validation of the new cut scores were based on previous research and federally reported state data Current cc.net reports reflect these current revised cut scores

What changed? Children need to have higher scores to be rated as performing similar to same age peers

How to explain the changes in APR and to Stakeholders Stress the importance of having numbers that are a more accurate representation of the status of the children Changes in the summary statements may not reflect a change in performance but a change in the measurement This could be a rationale for modifying your states targets for

How does this impact the OSEP Child Outcomes Reports OSEP reports will have smaller proportions of children in the D and E categories Size of the effect will depend on the: – % of children that being assessed with CCDC in your state –Ability level of the children in your population

Transition to GOLD: Implications for Reporting Entry data in cc.net and exit data in GOLD can be used for OSEP reporting Similar analyses have be conducted with GOLD to determine the cut scores. Results may vary since it is a new assessment an as a result may impact summary statements and future targets.

Next Webinar Review of new conversions from AEPSi and how that will effect your outcomes data –11/15: 11:00 PST/12:00 MST/1:00 CST/ 2:00EST –Call in number # 10 Early Childhood Outcomes Center