INTRUSION-RELATED GOLD SYSTEMS IN THE NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT: The Tooloom Example Brett McKay Malachite Resources NL

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL Classification of Intrusion-related gold systems Geological model The Tooloom Example Phoenix Intrusion-related gold systems in the New England Fold Belt metallogeny of NEFB comparison with LFB Newly recognised prospectivity of NEFB

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL Intrusion-related gold system (IRGS) characteristics: Au variably combined with Bi, Te, W, Mo, Sb, As Low sulphide content (<5%) Reduced mineral assemblage (Po, As, Py, Ilm, no Mag/Hem) Deposit and metal assemblage zoning: lateral & vertical Reduced I-type intrusives Intermediate to felsic WSnMo provinces Continental tectonic setting

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL Intrusion-related gold system (IRGS) characteristics: Sheeted veins, stockworks, breccias, disseminations, skarns, replacements, fissure veins Lateral and vertical metal zoning proximal Au-Bi-Te > Au-As > As-Sb-Au > Ag-Pb-Zn distal W±Mo at depth Au-Bi-Sb at shallower levels Examples: Donlin Creek: 28.5 Moz (measured & indicated resource) Pogo: 7 Moz (probable reserve) Fort Knox: 2.4 Moz (proven and probable reserve)

IRGS MODEL Modified from Hart et al., 2002

IRGS MODEL Modified from Lang et al., 2000

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL MAJOR IRGS DISTRICTS: Paleo-Tethys Closure Tintina Gold Belt Bolivia Eastern Australia Lang & Baker, 2001

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL THE TOOLOOM EXAMPLE:

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL THE TOOLOOM STORY HISTORY Tooloom is a major goldfield, long forgotten First discovered in 1857 – 10,000 alluvial miners Coarse gold – many nuggets: largest 140 ozs Hard rock sources barely touched Abandoned around 1870  Gympie Slipped into obscurity – few official records Minor alluvial gold mining continued until 2001 Phoenix first recognised as a prospect in 2003 DISCOVERY OF PHOENIX GOLD DEPOSIT IN 2005

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL Simplified geological map of the Tooloom area Cullens Phoenix Joes Gully Intrusive centres Frasers Simplified geological map of the Tooloom area

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL JOES GULLY INTRUSIVE CENTRE $1 JOES GULLY INTRUSIVE CENTRE extensive alluvial deposits coarse Au intergrown with qtz sheeted qtz vein and stockworks outcropping upstream minor outcropping intrusives and dykes

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL FRASERS INTRUSIVE CENTRE Frasers, Nine Mile, Back Creek extensive alluvial Au worked – Eight Mile Au-bearing qtz veins upstream visible Au in outcrop nearby intrusives  hydrothermal system? 1 cm GOLD Sheeted auriferous quartz veins

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL PHOENIX INTRUSIVE SYSTEM followup of multiple +20 ppb Au BLEG anomalies discovery of Phoenix Breccia 0.2 – 0.4 g/t Au from initial rock chips patchy Au in soils, low tenor coincident As-Sb-Bi-Cu soil anomaly, 1 km diameter large annular IP chargeability anomaly, > 400 m depth 2 km diameter aeromagnetic low Creek Zone → Au-Bi-As-Cu soil anomaly hornfelsed Emu Ck Fm sedimentary rocks  contact aureole diss. and veinlet pyrrhotite-pyrite-arsenopyrite  elevated Au 26 RC and diamond holes

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL PHOENIX SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Au As PHOENIX SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Sb Cu

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL Bi in soil over breccia = PHOENIX PROSPECT Bi soil geochemistry Bi in soil over breccia = gold at depth Breccia The Creek Zone: larger but weaker Bi anomaly (+Au-As-Sb)

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL PHOENIX PROSPECT Breccia pipe 70K Tonalite IP anomaly Main gold in soil anomaly Shear zone (controlling position of Phoenix Breccia?) Emu Creek Fm sedimentary rocks

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL PHOENIX PROSPECT: Phoenix Breccia: 85 m true width, +300 m outcrop length elongate, pipe-like geometry eg. 48 m @ 2.21 g/t Au polymictic, angular to subrounded clasts was up to 20% open-space qtz-carb-sulphide infill, at least two episodes jig-saw textured, limited vertical movement weak to locally intense Se alteration → Au grades

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL The Phoenix breccia in outcrop PHOENIX PROSPECT The Phoenix breccia in outcrop

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL The Phoenix breccia in drill core PHOENIX PROSPECT The Phoenix breccia in drill core

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL The Phoenix breccia in drill core PHOENIX PROSPECT The Phoenix breccia in drill core Late stibnite veins Sulphide infill of open-space in breccia

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL IRGS CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOENIX SYSTEM: Au-Bi-Sb-As association reduced mineral assemblage → Po-As-Py, no Mag/Hem low sulphide content <5% possible vertical metal zoning:  Sb-Py, slight  Au with depth located in mineralised contact aureole of buried intrusive? I-type, mod. reduced, felsic-intermediate intrusives in project area continental tectonic setting, post-orogenic W-Sn-Mo province (NEFB) mid-way between proximal and distal potential for range of other deposits PHOENIX is part of a large Intrusion-related Gold System

Present erosional level at Phoenix IRGS MODEL Present erosional level at Phoenix Phoenix Modified from Lang et al., 2000

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL IRGS in NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT Au, W, Sb, Sn, Mo and base metal occurrences Associated with intrusives: post orogenic I-type reduced felsic to intermediate low magnetic mid-Permian to early Triassic Veins, stockworks, pipes, disseminations, greisens, skarns Tooloom

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL IRGS in NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT Favourable granite geochemistry: Clarence River Supersuite → Tooloom Moonbi Supersuite → Timbarra; Tooloom? Uralla Supersuite Nundle Supersuite Gundle Belt Coastal Belt Various unnamed leucogranite intrusives Various deposits associated with intrusives: Kingsgate Mo-Bi; Glen Eden Mo-W-Sn; Taronga Sn

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL IRGS in the NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT Eg. Timbarra best studied IRGS in NEFB (Mustard, 2001 & 2004) disseminated Au in miarolitic carapace of monzogranite of Moonbi Supersuite strong Au correlation with Bi, Ag, Te weak Au correlation with Sb, Mo, As proximal i.e. within mineralising pluton only 60 km south-southwest of Phoenix Moonbi Supersuite outcrops in vicinity of Tooloom

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL IRGS in the NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT Comparison of NEFB  LFB LFB: Intensive exploration for porphyry Cu in 1960-70’s Arizona ‘light-bulb’ model unprospective for large Cu deposits later success with application of new model  Ordovician shoshonitic intrusives  Northparkes, Cadia

MALACHITE RESOURCES NL IRGS in the NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT Comparison of NEFB  LFB NEFB: Very little exploration though application of wide-ranging geological model Large Au deposits in Qld part  Cracow, Mt Morgan, Gympie NSW part regarded as unprospective IRGS will rediscover the NEFB as prospective for large Au deposits PHOENIX could do for the NEFB what Northparkes did for the LFB!

INTRUSION-RELATED GOLD SYSTEMS IN THE NEW ENGLAND FOLD BELT: The Tooloom Example Brett McKay Malachite Resources NL