EM COMPONENTS UPDATE & PERFORMANCE RESULTS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Front-end, Back-end, correlators
Advertisements

2010 SKA Africa Bursary Conference Chalmers University of Technology Jian Yang, Associate Professor Chalmers University of Technology Sweden.
FDWAVE : USING THE FD TELESCOPES TO DETECT THE MICRO WAVE RADIATION PRODUCED BY ATMOSPHERIC SHOWERS Simulation C. Di Giulio, for FDWAVE Chicago, October.
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Microstrip Reflectarrays Myths and Realities JINA Conference David M
Nasimuddin1 and Karu Esselle2
NRAO Receivers Richard Prestage
2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001.
Introduction to antennas
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
MVE MURI 99 Kick-off Meeting R. Barker, Technical Monitor Started 1 May 99 October 1999 Introduction Microwave and millimeter wave phased antenna arrays.
9. Radiation & Antennas Applied EM by Ulaby, Michielssen and Ravaioli.
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Offset Quadruple-Ridge Orthomode Transducer, Mode Splitter/Combiner
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
AuthorMeeting Title Date 1 EVLA Systems PDR Receivers/Feeds Daniel (Mert) MertelyEVLA System PDR:Receivers/Feeds 28 November, 2001.
Departement Elektriese en Elektroniese Ingenieurswese  Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Development of a Wideband Ortho-Mode Transducer.
Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.
Ankit Jain B.Tech 5 th Sem (ECE) IIIT Allahabad. High Gain ( db) Low cross polarization Reasonable bandwidth, Fractional Bandwidth being at least.
Efficient design of a C-band aperture-coupled stacked microstrip array using Nexxim and Designer Alberto Di Maria German Aerospace Centre (DLR) – Microwaves.
2M Moxon Antenna.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier.
Reconfigurable Low Profile Antenna James Soon Advisor: Dr. Prasad Shastry.
R. HaywardEVLA Feeds CDR - System Requirements 17 Feb EVLA Feeds CDR System Requirements.
US SKA TDP DVA-1 June 28-29, 2012Dish Verification Antenna No. 1 Critical Design Review, Penticton, BC Overview Of DVA-1 Optics Lynn Baker Bill Imbriale.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
K band History Science workshop determined efficiency improvements necessary for K Band: weather, observing requests, mapping programs. Only enough funds.
Electromagnetic Design of Broadband Antenna Feed Systems for the Northern Cross Radio Telescope (Bologna, Italy) Designed Broad Band Antenna Feed Systems.
S. SrikanthEVLA Feed/FE PDR February 12-13, 2002 EVLA FEEDS DESIGN S. Srikanth NRAO/Charlottesville.
Thoughts on the Design of a WVR for Alan Roy (MPIfR) the Twin Telescope at Wettzell.
Design of Microwave Undulator Cavity
Centimeter Receiver Design Considerations with a look to the future Steven White National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
1 EM COMPONENTS UPDATE & PERFORMANCE RESULTS S. Srikanth Critical Design Review GBT K-Band Focal Plane Array January 30-31, 2009.
WINTER 01 Template.
Reflector Antennas Antenna and Microwave Laboratory In the name of God
The Design and Analysis of Multi-megawatt Distributed Single Pole Double Throw (SPDT) Microwave Switches Sami G. Tantawi, and Mikhail I. Petelin Stanford.
Chapter 3 Antenna Types Part 1.
Helix Antenna Antenna and Microwave Laboratory In the name of God
Horn Antennas. Basic Concept The horn antenna gains its name from its appearance Type of Aperture antenna A horn antenna is used for the transmission.
K-Band Focal Plane Array Project Engineering Overview Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 2/27/2008.
10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee1 EVLA Front Ends.
DVAC PROGRESS OFFSET GREGORIAN DISH (DVAC-1) 郑元鹏 (Yuanpeng Zheng ) Joint Lab. for Radio Astronomy and Technology MAY 29, 2012.
C-Band Feed Design and Prototype Tests
Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Microwave and Radiating Systems(12EC71)
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Beam Measurement Characterization and Optics Tolerance Analysis of a 900 GHz HEB receiver for the ASTE telescope Alvaro Gonzalez, K. Kaneko, Y. Uzawa.
Circular waveguide for Low Loss Transmission of Microwave and mm-Wave signals Circular to Rectangular Waveguide Transitions Easy to Manufacture and Very.
Karl Young, Shaul Hanany, Neil Trappe, Darragh McCarthy
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
L/C Dual-Band Dual-Polarized Shared Aperture Array
L BAND HELIX ANTENNA ARRAY
Pin-fed back to back pyramidal horn antenna
Low-profile corrugated feeder horn antenna (Bull's Eye)
EVLA – Polarizers for X, Ku, K and Ka Bands
Horn Antenna( at X band) with Waveguide port
university Microstrip Antenna Supervised by : Dr. Sherif HEKAL
Septum Feeds and Polarizers
Slot antenna.
X-Y Planar Precision Scanner
Ka-Band Feed Design and Prototype Tests
X-, Ku-, S-Band Feed Design
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array
WEEKLY SEMINAR Sunryul Kim
Helical antenna It is a simple Broad band VHF and UHF antenna. The concept of Helical antenna is first introduced by J.D.Kraus. It consists of a helix.
Paper review Yun-tae Park Antennas & RF Devices Lab.
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array
Presentation transcript:

EM COMPONENTS UPDATE & PERFORMANCE RESULTS S. Srikanth Critical Design Review GBT K-Band Focal Plane Array January 30-31, 2009

KFPA Feed Frequency 18-26.5 GHz Feed taper -13 dB Compact/Profile taper horn Ring-loaded corrugations Aperture ID = 2.93” (5.5λ22) OD = 3.4” Length = 6.658” Pitch = 0.082” (λ18/8) Vane = 0.026” Depth = 0.13” (0.28λ26.5) 69 corrugations Θi = 8º ; Θmax = 17º

Layout of Elements (61 feeds) Element spacing 3.45” 1+6+12+18+24

22 GHz; Telescope beams in Azimuth (asym.) plane HPBW = 34” X” Throw (arcsec) (HPBW) 3.45 94 2.7 6.9 189 5.5 10.4 284 8.2 13.8 378 11.0 17.3 473 13.7 Beam throw 27.4”/inch; 0.43HPBW/λ

22 GHz; Telescope beams in Elevation (symm.) plane HPBW = 34” Throw (arcsec) (HPBW) 6 164 4.8 12 331 9.6 18 498 14.5 Beam throw 27.4”/inch; 0.43HPBW/λ

Feed Offset & Aperture Efficiency Circle #1 (3.4”rad): 7 feeds 62.9% min. Circle#2 (6.9”rad): 19 feeds 62.9% min. Circle#3 (10.4”rad): 37 feeds, 61.7% min. Circle#4 (13.8”rad): 61 feeds, 58.9% (az); 61.6% (el) Circle 18.0” : 91 feeds, 54.7% (az); 60.2% (el)

Optimum orientation of Elements

Beam width & Beam spacing Freq. (GHz) HPBW Beam Spacing (HPBW) 18 40” 2.3 22 34” 2.7 24 31” 3.0 26.5 29” 3.2 Element spacing 3.45”; Beam spacing 94arcsec Beam throw 27.4 arcsec/”

Measured Patterns & Taper Freq. (GHz) H-pln (dB) E-pln 18 -11.7 -11.2 19 -12.6 -12.3 20 -13.2 -13.6 21 -13.7 -14.2 22 23 -13.5 -14.0 24 25 -13.0 -13.4 26 -14.3 26.5 -13.9 -14.7 Avg.

Measured Cross-polarization in 45 deg. plane

KFPA (Profile Horn) Feed Vs. 20 GHz (Linear Taper) Feed Measured feed patterns

KFPA (Profile Horn) Feed Vs. 20 GHz (Linear Taper) Feed Telescope beam patterns, Efficiency Freq. (GHz) Linear taper Profile ήapl- ήapp ------------------ ήapl (%) Edgetaper (dB) Edge taper (dB) ήapp 18 -12.64 0.6995 -11.45 0.6965 0.43 20 -12.23 0.7284 -13.41 0.6560 9.94 22 -14.07 0.6888 -13.95 0.6189 10.15

KFPA (Profile Horn) Feed Vs. 24 GHz (Linear Taper) Feed Measured feed patterns

KFPA (Profile Horn) Feed Vs. 24 GHz (Linear Taper) Feed Telescope beam patterns, Efficiency Freq. (GHz) Linear taper Profile ήapl- ήapp ------------------ ήapl (%) Edgetaper (dB) Edge taper (dB) ήapp 22 -12.10 0.6770 -13.95 0.6189 8.58 24 -12.58 0.6669 -13.48 0.6050 9.28 26.5 -12.46 0.6456 -14.32 0.5864 9.17

18-26.5 GHz Phase Shifter 0.474 x 0.452; Length 4.84” S. Srikanth, “A Wide-Band Corrugated Rectangular Waveguide Phase Shifter for Cryogenically Cooled Receivers”, IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, Volume 7, pp. 150-152, June 1997.

MEASURED RETURN LOSS

MEASURED INSERTION LOSS

Measured Phase Difference

ORTHO MODE JUNCTION 6061T6 Aluminum 353 Leaded brass WR42 waveguide; 4.5” x 2.8” Septum 0.010” (Beryl. Cu) Pin 0.040” dia. (Beryl. Cu) E. Wollack, “A Full Waveguide Band Orthomode Junction”, EDIR No. 303, NRAO, May 16, 1996

6061T6 ALUMINUM Vs. 353 LEADED BRASS

Measured of S-parameters- Brass OMJ

Measured of S-parameters- Al. OMJ Side arm Main arm