doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Supporting Low Power Operation
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
WUR power save mode and clock drifting problem
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
Trigger Frame Format for az
PHY Security FRD and SRD Text
Passive Location Date: Authors: March 2017
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
Polling for MU Measurements
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
SU Sounding Measurement Exchange and Feedback
Protected LTF Using PMF in SU and MU Modes
Sounding and P Matrix Proposal
Short WUR Frame Date: Authors: Mar 2018 Liwen Chu Marvell
TGn Sync Calibration for Beamforming
Integration of WUR to Power Save Mode
Power Efficient PS Poll
Frame Responding Rules for NDP Ranging
NDP Ranging Error Recovery
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Secure Ranging Measurement
120MHz channelization solution
11az STA Polling for MU NDP Ranging
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO
BSS Color in NDP Ranging
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
Intel Secured Location Threat Model
11az STA Polling for MU NDP Ranging
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Objectives of Explicit Feedback rules
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Proposed Resolution to CID2114
Measurement Report Feedback in 11az
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Phase Shift Based TOA Reporting in Passive Location Ranging
Intel Secured Location Threat Model
NDP Bandwidth Selection in Range Measurement
Sounding-only Support During Ranging
Fixed Inter Frame Spacing for BRP in ay
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
BSS Color in NDP Ranging
CToA Protocol Analysis
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Intel Secured Location Threat Model
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Date: 2017-06-11 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 June, 2017 VHT Sounding Feedback Date: 2017-06-11 Authors: Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al John Doe, Some Company

Recap – VHT Sounding Protocol June, 2017 Recap – VHT Sounding Protocol SIFS+X NDP-A Initiator NDP Responder SIFS LMR Protocol is completely unscheduled When medium is idle, initiator can send NDP-A followed by NDP If available, responder replies with NDP within SIFS After “SIFS+X” LMR is fed back to initiator Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Open Questions What is in the Location Measurement Report (LMR) June, 2017 Open Questions What is in the Location Measurement Report (LMR) Ideally includes t2 (ToA) and t3 (ToD). similarly to legacy FTM protocol Could also include raw CSI and t2’ and t3, where t2 can be derived from FFT window start t2’ and CSI (find first path) What does “SIFS + X” mean Ideally X=0, the initiator has all it needs and can go off channel X>0 could be needed for some implementations to finish calculating t2 or even to get the CSI ready Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Discussion Case for ToA report within SIFS Case for CSI Feedback June, 2017 Discussion Case for ToA report within SIFS Possible for responders with ToA algorithm in hardware Ideal case for initiators, half the work already done Full transactions is finished within one TxOP, no need for buffers at responder or need for initiator to wait/come back Case for CSI Feedback Low cost responder might not have the computational muscle or implementation complexity to accurately calculate ToA Can completely outsource this task to initiator CSI should be easily available after SIFS, or shortly thereafter Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Which is the Mandatory Mode? June, 2017 Which is the Mandatory Mode? ToA Feedback within SIFS Any initiator who can accept CSI feedback can also accept ToA (ultimately CSI is used to calculate ToA) Limitation on the responder, how accurate a ToA can be calculated within SIFS, any? Not all responders can be expected to implement this CSI Feedback A responder who already supports ToA within SIFS might not want to offer also CSI feedback Not every initiator has the ability to process CSI Since this CSI format is new, making it mandatory adds huge cost Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Need for a Mandatory Mode June, 2017 Need for a Mandatory Mode The mandatory LMR mode needs to include ToA The responder needs enough time to calculate ToA Base it on current FTM ToA is assumed ready for transmit at next FTM packet MinDeltaFtm can be between 1-255 in 0.1 ms increments Typically 0.5-1.5 ms is used This is implementable How about efficiency? Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Implementation FTM Setup/Negotiation June, 2017 Sounding Time [ms] LMR Availability MinToaReady MaxToaAvailable FTM Setup/Negotiation Responders declares MinToaReady similar to MinDeltaFtm Tells the initiator when to expect LMR After this interval the responder will try to send the LMR to the initiator (use RTS/CTS to see if initiator is there) Responder also declares MaxToaAvailable Tells the initiator how long LMR will be stored The initiator can “pull” the LMR from the responder by starting a new sounding sequence (staggered feedback) or by sending a PS poll Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Case 1: Stay on Channel If MinToaReady < 3 ms June, 2017 Case 1: Stay on Channel If MinToaReady < 3 ms Makes sense for initiator to camp on channel Activate power save for programmed time Responder will send LMR after MinToaReady, once channel is idle If MaxToaAvailable < 10 ms The responder could choose a small MaxToaAvailable to encourage initiators to stay on channel This reduces need for large buffers Possibly attempt transmitting LMR once more at MaxToaAvailable (RTS-CTS) Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Case 2: Go off Channel If MinToaReady > 10 ms June, 2017 Case 2: Go off Channel If MinToaReady > 10 ms Makes sense for initiator to go off channel Come back before MaxToaAvailable expires Pull LMR explicitly or start new sounding Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al

Summary ToA should be mandatory June, 2017 Summary ToA should be mandatory All 11az STA should be able to provide some sort of ToA Low cost STA can advertise CSI feedback capability to increase possible accuracy when acting as responder High performance APs will offer ToA feedback after SIFS as responder by setting MinToaReady and MaxToaAvailable to 0 Christian R. Berger, Marvell et al