Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages (July 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bong Hwan Sung, Xiaodong Zhu, Irina Kaverina, Alissa M. Weaver 
Advertisements

Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2013)
Meghal Gandhi, Vérane Achard, Laurent Blanchoin, Bruce L. Goode 
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Talin Autoinhibition Is Required for Morphogenesis
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (July 2011)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages (November 2014)
Adhesion-Dependent Wave Generation in Crawling Cells
Bong Hwan Sung, Xiaodong Zhu, Irina Kaverina, Alissa M. Weaver 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
A Molecular Pathway for Myosin II Recruitment to Stress Fibers
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Actin Waves: Origin of Cell Polarization and Migration?
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Alpha Actinin-1 Regulates Cell-Matrix Adhesion Organization in Keratinocytes: Consequences for Skin Cell Motility  Kevin J. Hamill, Sho Hiroyasu, Zachary.
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Stephanie C. Weber, Clifford P. Brangwynne  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages R362-R364 (May 2008)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Interaction of Cortactin and N-WASp with Arp2/3 Complex
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
The Chemokine SDF1a Coordinates Tissue Migration through the Spatially Restricted Activation of Cxcr7 and Cxcr4b  Guillaume Valentin, Petra Haas, Darren.
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Jacopo Scrofani, Teresa Sardon, Sylvain Meunier, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Myosin-IXA Regulates Collective Epithelial Cell Migration by Targeting RhoGAP Activity to Cell-Cell Junctions  Tatiana Omelchenko, Alan Hall  Current.
Andrew R. Wagner, Qing Luan, Su-Ling Liu, Brad J. Nolen 
Carl Co, Derek T. Wong, Sarah Gierke, Vicky Chang, Jack Taunton  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Loss of Scar/WAVE Complex Promotes N-WASP- and FAK-Dependent Invasion
Volume 21, Issue 17, Pages (September 2011)
Fanny S. Chang, Christopher J. Stefan, Kendall J. Blumer 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2003)
Arisa Uemura, Thuc-Nghi Nguyen, Amanda N. Steele, Soichiro Yamada 
Volume 26, Issue 20, Pages (October 2016)
ICAM-1 forms distinct complexes with filamin B, α-actinin-4 and cortactin. ICAM-1 forms distinct complexes with filamin B, α-actinin-4 and cortactin. (A)
Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Promotes Invadopodia Activity
Drosophila embryonic hemocytes
Aip1 Destabilizes Cofilin-Saturated Actin Filaments by Severing and Accelerating Monomer Dissociation from Ends  Ambika V. Nadkarni, William M. Brieher 
MT1-MMP-Dependent Invasion Is Regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Deconstructing the Cadherin-Catenin-Actin Complex
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Joshua S. Weinger, Minhua Qiu, Ge Yang, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages 1276-1285 (July 2005) Cortactin Promotes Cell Motility by Enhancing Lamellipodial Persistence  Nicole S. Bryce, Emily S. Clark, Ja’Mes L. Leysath, Joshua D. Currie, Donna J. Webb, Alissa M. Weaver  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages 1276-1285 (July 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Loss of Cortactin Results in Defective Cellular Migration and Invasion (A) A 19 bp sequence of human cortactin targeted by siRNA. Mismatches to mouse cortactin are marked by asterisks. (B) Western blot of cortactin expression levels in control (pRS), knockdown (pRS-KD), overexpression vector only (LZRS), cortactin-overexpressing cells (LZRS-CortFL), knockdown cells rescued with vector only (pRS-KD/LZRS) or with full-length mouse cortactin (pRS-KD/LZRS-CortFL), or cells expressing a scrambled cortactin siRNA oligo (scrambled oligo). (C) Relative migration through transwell membranes. (D) Relative invasion though matrigel-coated transwell membranes. (E) Velocity of cell lines undergoing random motility. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM) from three experiments performed in duplicate (transwell studies) or from n = 50 cells (random motility). * indicates p < 0.01, compared to pRS and scrambled oligo control cells. Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Lamellipodial Persistence Is Decreased in Cortactin Knockdown Cells Representative kymographs from both control (A) and cortactin knockdown cells (B). Note the definitions in (A) of lamellipodial persistence (Δx), protrusion distance (Δy2), and protrusion velocity (Δy1/Δx1). Scale bars indicate distance and time axes for kymographs. The following are shown: quantification of lamellipodial (C) persistence; (D) protrusion distance; (E) protrusion velocity; and (F) retraction velocity. Error bars represent SEM. * indicates p < 0.01, compared to pRS and scrambled oligo control cells, and n = 50 cells. Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cell Motility and Lamellipodial Protrusion Depend on Interactions of Cortactin with Both Arp2/3 and F-actin (A) The following cortactin-rescue constructs are shown: LZRS-Cort-FL (wild-type); LZRS-Cort-NTerm (N-terminus); LZRS-CortΔ4RP (actin binding mutant); LZRS-CortW22A (Arp2/3 binding mutant). The following abbreviations and symbols are used: NTA, N-terminal acidic domain; ovals, cortactin repeat domains; YYY, three src phosphorylation sites; and SH3, src homology 3 domain. These mutations are described in [5, 19]. (B) Western blot showing expression of rescue constructs in cortactin knockdown cells. (C) Relative migration through transwell membranes. n = 3 with duplicate wells. (D) Velocity of cell lines undergoing random motility on tissue-culture dishes; n ≥ 50 cells. (E) Relative invasion of cortactin cell lines through matrigel-coated transwell membranes. n = 3 with duplicate wells. (F) Lamellipodial persistence is shown, and n ≥ 50 cells. For all experiments (C–F), error bars represent SEM and * indicates p < 0.01, when compared to pRS and scrambled oligo cells. For invasion studies (E), * indicates p < 0.01, when also compared to pRS-KD/LZRS-Cort-FL, in addition to pRS and scrambled oligo cells. ** indicates p < 0.05, when compared to pRS and scrambled oligo cells. Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cortactin Is Recruited to Lamellipodia by Arp2/3 Complex Cortactin localization in HT1080 cells was assessed by immunofluorescence (A, C, E, G, and I). Alexa-fluor-phalloidin staining shows actin filaments (B, D, F, H, and J). Cell lines are as follows: pRS (A, B), pRS-KD (C, D), pRS-KD/LZRS-CortFL (E, F), pRS-KD/LZRS-W22A (G, H), and pRS-KD/LZRS-Δ4RP (I, J); the scale bar represents 10 μm. (K) Fluorescent-intensity measurements from line scans across the width of lamellipodia (representative line in panel [E]) are shown. Points represent the mean ± SEM from n = 50 cells. * indicates p < 0.01 when compared to pRS. Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cortactin Preferentially Binds to Dynamic Actin (A) Specific equilibrium binding of N-terminal (N-term) cortactin to actin filaments. The data are plotted as the mean ± SEM (n = 7). (B) Representative Western blot (upper) showing depletion of N-terminal cortactin from supernatants of a cosedimentation experiment. The corresponding Coomassie-stained gel of actin pellets from the cosedimentation experiment is shown below. Concentrations of ADP- and ATP/ADP-Pi-actin filaments for each lane are indicated between the blot and gel. (C) Specific equilibrium binding of cortactin to actin filaments, as indicated. The data are plotted as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cortactin Enhances In Vivo Production of Uncapped Barbed Ends of Actin Filaments (A) shows a representative control cell (pRS). (C) shows a representative pRS-KD cell. White boxes in (A) and (C) indicate regions magnified in (B) and (D). Representative kymographs of pRS (E) and pRS-KD (F) cells treated in the same manner as (A–D) are shown. (G) shows quantification of average pixel intensity of a standardized 2.5 μm2 square at the leading edge of the lamellipodia in Alexa-488-actin-labeled images from control (pRS and Scrambled), pRS-KD, and pRS/LZRS-CortFL cells (white boxes in [B] and [D] show the size of the square used for quantification). Error bars represent SEM; * indicates p < 0.01, n = 65 cells. Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Deficient Adhesion Assembly in Cortactin Knockdown Cells (A) Time series of GFP-paxillin-marked adhesion assembly and disassembly of pRS (top) and cortactin knockdown (pRS-KD) cells (bottom). Time = 0 indicates start of adhesion. Arrows indicate adhesions. The bar represents 10 μm. (B and C) Graph of adhesion assembly (B) and disassembly (C) of pRS (closed squares) and pRS-KD cells (closed triangles). Points represent average ± SEM of the natural log of the ratio of the integrated fluorescent intensity at each time point to the initial fluorescent intensity. Measurements were performed on 10 to 15 individual adhesions from 5–7 cells. The slope of the line represents the rate constants of assembly and disassembly of adhesions. Current Biology 2005 15, 1276-1285DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.043) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions