Fig. 4. Trunk kinematics and human locomotion diagram.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© red ©
Advertisements

New Hexagonal Design for MINERvA A. Bodek- Sept Now even counters have a 1.2 solid steel picture frame Around the 3 m wide active target. The.
By: Ashley. Spot Color Spot color refers to the process of selecting text or a graphic object such as a circle and then adding a spot of color to it.
Interactions of movement and EODs for producing envelopes.
Fig. 2. Interaction between upward and forward forces during standing and walking. Interaction between upward and forward forces during standing and walking.
What Color is it?.
Ryan T. Roemmich, Andrew W. Long, Amy J. Bastian  Current Biology 
Geckos Race Across the Water’s Surface Using Multiple Mechanisms
Environmental Consistency Determines the Rate of Motor Adaptation
12cm Area 64cm2 Area 100cm2 ? ? Area ?cm2 12cm Area 36cm2
Fig. 5. Prip silencing enhances the co-localization of GABARAP with insulin vesicles and β-tubulin.Co-localization of GABARAP (green) with insulin (red)
Fig. 1. Overview of the nervous system of the adult S. roscoffensis.
Fig. 2. Outline of the two types of stimulus sequences employed in the analysis.(A) Environment information stimuli; (B) adaptation stimuli. Outline of.
Fig. 3. External work and kinetic and potential energy of the whole body for the mean individual (individual 10) in the mean population (population 1)
Fig. 1. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy.
Fig. 4. E-cadherin expression level affects monomer dynamics.
Fig. 4. smc3 regulates the expression of cx43 in regenerating fins.
Fig. 7. Motion adaptation increases time-dependent response modulations (TDRM) relatively to the average cell response.TDRM normalized to the value obtained.
Fig. 2. Proportion of motile objects and track length
Correlation between TN motoneuronal activity and tentacle movement during fictive locomotion. Correlation between TN motoneuronal activity and tentacle.
Fig. 1. Oviposition on 10% ethanol vs 0% ethanol.
Fig. 1. Mitochondrial internalization in cardiomyocytes.
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram showing distribution and dynamics of four E-cadherin populations within the ROI of a FRAP experiment. Schematic diagram showing.
Fig. 4. The model of malate metabolism in fruit cells under different K level conditions. The model of malate metabolism in fruit cells under different.
Fig. 5. Recovery steps of mitotic acentriolar cells after cold MT depolymerisation.(A,B) Time-lapse sequences of mitotic spindle re-formation at 18°C.
Fig. 1. Pigmentation and melanophore counts of rainbow trout parr and smolt caudal fins.Pigmentation of (A) parr and (B) smolt. Pigmentation and melanophore.
Fig. 1. Ovarian cancer spheroids can bud from a monolayer
Fig. 3. Genetic interactions between unc-53 and unc-6 and between unc-53 and unc-5 affect intracellular UNC-40::GFP localization.(A–H) Photomicrographs.
Differentiation of neural crest cells into corneal endothelial cells
Effect of 20E on locomotion behavior.
Fig. 2. Dispersal pattern and walking distances of the two wingless strains of Acyrthosiphon pisum in 24 h. Dispersal pattern and walking distances of.
Fig. 2. Mean oxygen consumption per metre (mL O2 m−1) of jump distance between springboards during horizontal jumping.Seven jumping conditions were generated.
Fig. 4. Non-autonomous rescue of puc expression in DME cells
Fig. 5. The bulk of Cep135 localizes distantly from Sas-6 and STIL
Simulation of cell arrangement patterns with the RO-only model.
Fig. 1. Effects on the tight junction barrier and permeability following doxorubicin and Herceptin treatment. Effects on the tight junction barrier and.
Fig. 2. Soluble sugar and organic acid levels with different K fertilization during fruit development. Soluble sugar and organic acid levels with different.
Fig. 1. Aboveground biomass of Caragana and herbaceous plants, and proportional abundance of Caragana, under different grazing management treatments. Aboveground.
Fig. 1 A new aerodynamic force platform accurately measures the complete transfer of vertical impulse generated during foraging flights. A new aerodynamic.
Fig. 7. Representative images of control (Cas9+GFP) and Cas9+gRNA+GFP co-injected embryos on day 4 of culture, showing nuclear-imported GFP (green) and.
Fig. 4. Co-immunostaining of nocodazole or ASNase treated RPE-1 cells with anti-hASNS and anti-alpha tubulin showed defect in both mitotic spindle formation.
Bivariate plots of mean total scratches and mean total pits for natural grazers. Bivariate plots of mean total scratches and mean total pits for natural.
Table 1. Average ± S.E. of level of dissimilarity scores of each feature per stripe per pattern comparison of sides of the same fish (“Same Individual”),
Fig. 4. Schematic representing clock contribution to Fgf21 regulation in the liver. Schematic representing clock contribution to Fgf21 regulation in the.
Statistical chart of significantly differentially expressed genes
Fig. 2. Kinetics of OptoEphB2 activation.
Gaps in our understanding of aerodynamic mechanisms across insects and vertebrates. Gaps in our understanding of aerodynamic mechanisms across insects.
Fig. 1. Phenotypic characterisation of primary human tubular epithelial cells and human renal fibroblasts. Phenotypic characterisation of primary human.
Fig. 4. Spectra of monochromatic light from the OLS
Fig. 2. RGD and KGD motifs in N. vectensis thrombospondins
Relationship between testes mass and testosterone (T) levels before handling (baseline), post-handling, and after a GnRH injection. Relationship between.
12cm Area 64cm2 Area 100cm2 ? ? Area ?cm2 12cm Area 36cm2
Fig. 6. F1 trβ mutants accomplish natural metamorphosis.
Vertical ground reaction force–time waveforms for RFS trials.
Vertical ground reaction force–time waveforms for FFS trials.
Fig. 2. iPSCs produce functional osteoblasts.
Fig. 2. Tbx1 lineage is largely complementary to the NSD
Fig. 2. Effects of pH on percentage of motile spermatozoa and VAP after 1 and 5 min after activation. Effects of pH on percentage of motile spermatozoa.
Fig. 12. Overview of the molecular program essential to build mdDA neurons.The genes identified in this study (in red) have been added to the programming.
Variations in TA burst parameters between postures during an E20 experiment. Variations in TA burst parameters between postures during an E20 experiment.
Fig. 3. Mean force and velocity during jumping
Kinematics and hydrodynamics of free swimming.
Fig. 3. Posture×step interaction.
Fig. 1. Microarray analyses of genes whose expression is regulated by innervation during synaptogenesis.(A) Schematic drawings of the experimental design.
Fig. 5. Behaviours of the wild-types Oregon-R at two temperatures.
Fig. 8. Expression of other genomic-clustered Chrn subunits in the mesodiencephalon.(A) Schematic representation illustrating the assembly of the Chrnb4,
Graphical representation of pain levels versus time postinjury, annotated across control, persistently hypersensitive genotypes and diabetic conditions,
Structure–function analysis of CGEF-1.
The vertical ground reaction force–time waveforms generated by the model for FFS trials with varied m1 values. The vertical ground reaction force–time.
Flow field adjacent to an eel (body length L=0
Presentation transcript:

Fig. 4. Trunk kinematics and human locomotion diagram. Trunk kinematics and human locomotion diagram. (A) The trunk kinematics in the sagittal plane across three level (pale lines) and three uneven steps (solid lines) with regular erect (RE, black), 30° trunk flexion (TF1, blue), 50° trunk flexion (TF2, green), maximal trunk flexion (TF3, red) postures. The shaded area, the second step across two setups, separates pre- and post-perturbation steps. (B) Side view of the instrumented walkway with three consecutive force plates denoted by U-1 (pre-perturbation step), U0 (perturbation step) and U+1 (post-perturbation step). The second force plate (drop) was lower by 10 cm in walking on uneven ground. Soran Aminiaghdam, and Christian Rode Biology Open 2017;6:1000-1007 © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd