Policy discussion paper Successes in reducing smoking in pregnancy at SFHFT: Supporting NHS England ‘Saving Babies’ Lives’ Claire Allison: Antenatal Suite.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Detection and clinical management of intrauterine growth restriction in a low-risk population: experience and attitudes of midwives and obstetricians Dr.
Advertisements

 may be efective in preventing SGA birth in women at high risk of preeclampsia although the effect size is small. (c)
Health Visiting and FNP services.
Models for Access to Maternal Smoking CessationSupport (MAMSS) Mererid Bowley, Consultant in Public Health MAMSS Project Management Group.
The Health Roundtable Pregnancy Weight Matters Presenter: Glyn Teale Hospital Code Name: Wombat Innovation Poster Session HRT1104b – Maternity March
Impact of reduced in-home secondhand smoke exposure on low birth weight prevalence and neonate health PEER Health Research Project Dr. Yayi Suryo Prabandari.
Smoking Cessation Ruby Poppleton Health Improvement Specialist.
Northern England Strategic Clinical Network Conference
Growth Assessment Protocol
報 告 者 王瓊琦. postpartum depression : identification of women at risk.
12 JUNE 2012 DUE DATA – IMPROVING MIDWIVES’ USE OF DATA AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION JULIE TINDALE-MIDWIFE Maternity Data Update on issues.
“Evaluating the impact of a regional approach to babyClear, and tackling the high levels of maternal smoking in North East England” 2015 UKNSCC, Manchester.
Engaging Pregnant Women to Stop Smoking – Creating Effective Referral Pathways and Increasing Quit Rates By Hayley Bates and Catherine Sixsmith.
Maternity Framework Antenatal Access Target and Outcome Measures Data Theme Work Stream Women and Children’s Health Information Programme Lindsay Mathie.
INFANT BIRTH OUTCOMES AMONG SUBSTANCE USING WOMEN: WHY QUITTING SMOKING IS JUST AS IMPORTANT AS QUITTING HARDER DRUGS Beth Bailey, PhD; Judy McCook, PhD,
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide Using a range of NHS staff to deliver stop smoking services to pregnant women: (preliminary) findings from.
Healthy Child Programme. Why the Healthy Child Programme matters Giving every child the best start in life is crucial to reducing health inequalities.
The Broader Impact of Incentive Schemes to Enable Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Tina Williams June 2015.
The growth of North East Stop Smoking Services: challenges and successes since 1999 Martyn Willmore Performance Improvement Delivery Manager Fresh – Smoke.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Factors influencing caesarean section infection rates B Karunakaran, R Oakes, N Biswas, N McCord Poole.
The London Health Observatory: monitoring health and health care in the capital, supporting practitioners and informing decision-makers Born Equal? Inequalities.
1 Access to and use of aids to smoking cessation in the UK Robert West University College London Austin, Texas February 2007.
The ‘impossible dream’ Implementing a No Smoking Policy on hospital grounds - Why preventing smoking in the workplace requires more than just policy Trina.
Maternal & Early Years Healthy Weight Service Evaluation December 2010.
BACKGROUND Despite the well established link between fetal macrosomia and maternal diabetes, it is estimated that 80% of macrosomic babies are born to.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Society for Prevention Research 21st Annual Meeting (May 28-31, 2013) in San Francisco, CA A. Fogarasi-Grenczer 1, I. Rákóczi 2, K. L. Foley PhD. 3, P.
THE HEALTH CHALLENGE Sheila Shribman National Clinical Director Children, Young People & Maternity.
Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy A review of the Challenge Linda Bauld Hilary Wareing Hazel Cheeseman.
Wellbeing and mental health Hard evidence: a mental health case study Heema Shukla Independent Policy Developer Wellbeing and mental health.
Lifestyle factors associated with preterm births
Maternity Transformation in Nottinghamshire
Dementia Risk Reduction Melanie Earlam PHE 27th September 2016
Working in Partnership to Reduce Smoking throughout Pregnancy
Smoking in Pregnancy Addressing the Pregnancy Challenge
UOG Journal Club: January 2016
For Healthy Women who are at low risk of complications in pregnancy and childbirth. The Free Standing Midwifery Unit at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd Is it a safe.
Janice Smith*, Dr Maddy Arden, Dr Penny Furness, Dr Hora Soltani
Smoking Quitters 2013/14.
By Maeve O’Connell RGN/ RM & Dr. Maria Duaso
WELSH RISK POOL Vicky Langford.
Linda de Caestecker Director of Public Health
Basic Antenatal Care Package in South Africa
Development of Indicator Scores Using Items from the WHO Safe Motherhood Needs Assessment to Examine Utilisation of Maternal Health Services in South Africa.
Incentivising Smokefree Pregnancy:
Jo Locker, Senior Tobacco Control Programme Manager
Towards a Smokefree Generation
A smokefree pregnancy: a perspective from NHS England
How the RCM supports midwives to give great care
PHE Aims and Actions in Maternal and Child Health
Maternal health and early years
RAcE Niger Final Evaluation Results
Towards a Smokefree Generation: A Tobacco Control Plan for England South West Clinical Senate 21 September 2017
Dr James Carlton, Medical Adviser
MENTAL HEALTH and SUBSTANCE MISUSE
C H A P T E R 1 9 Prolonged pregnancy and disorders of uterine action
68.3 million errors (28% of total) cause moderate or serious harm
Is Alcohol a Problem? -Setting the Scene
Improving Perinatal Outcomes Maternity Perspective
Local Implementation of NICE Guidance 6th December 2017
National Driver Diagram
JANICE RYMER MD FRCOG FRANZCOG FHEA Vice-President for Education, RCOG
Making the Case for Health and Work Champions
England’s under 18 conception rate:
Scottish Obstetric Cardiology Network
Increasing breastfeeding prevalence
Transforming Maternity Services Mini-Collaborative
Reducing Smoking in Pregnancy
Professor Deborah Baker
WHAT WORKS BEST WHEN COMPLETING PRE-BIRTH RISK ASSESSMENTS?
Presentation transcript:

Policy discussion paper Successes in reducing smoking in pregnancy at SFHFT: Supporting NHS England ‘Saving Babies’ Lives’ Claire Allison: Antenatal Suite Coordinator Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Dr Séamus Allison: Senior Lecturer Nottingham Trent University 1

Background Smoking in pregnancy is a major public health concern and the current national ambition target has been set to reduce the rate of smoking at time of delivery (SATOD) to ≤6% by 2020. Smoking is a modifiable risk factor in pregnancy. It is known that smoking or smoke exposure during pregnancy can cause serious health problems and has further implications throughout childhood. Smoking is strongly associated with several adverse socio-economic and educational indicators.   2

'Saving Babies Lives' care bundle 2016 NHS England recently set a national ambition to halve the rates of stillbirths by 2030, with a 20% reduction by 2020. ‘Saving Babies’ Lives’ will help maternity services meet this aspiration. Reducing the incidence of maternal smoking during pregnancy forms one of the evidence based four elements of the NHS England ‘Saving Babies’ Lives’ care bundle. 3

The total annual cost to the NHS of smoking during pregnancy is estimated to range between £8.1 and £64 million for treating the resulting problems for mothers. The cost for treating infants (aged 0–12 months) is estimated between £12  and £23.5 million. 4

Key milestones with SATOD data at SFHFT Smoking prevalence amongst routine and manual occupations: 2012 28% and in 2017 26% 2003 SATOD 32% 2009 SATOD 24.16% post SNAP Trial 2010 Brief Intervention training CMWs 2013-14 SATOD 27% data cleansed & commenced ‘Opt out Trial’, CO readings plus 25 and 34 week smoking enquiry 2014-15 SATOD 22.29%: Risk Perception commenced 2017-18 SATOD 20.55% 5

Smoking cessation pathway development 2011 Community midwives had Brief Intervention education 2013 University of Nottingham ‘Opt out’ study: introduction of a CO reading at 12 weeks of pregnancy 2014 Risk Perception Intervention commenced (Motivational Interviewing based intervention) 2017 CO readings at first contact commenced 6

Antenatal pathway for women who smoke 1. CO reading at first contact by community midwife (NICE compliant) 2. After dating scan Risk Perception with a repeat CO reading for women continuing to smoke 3. Discussion about smoking raised at every subsequent antenatal contact 4. Serial growth scans for women who continue to smoke at 28, 32, 36, 39 and 41 weeks to detect fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age babies to reduce the term still birth rate: NHS England Saving Babies’ Lives 5. Smoking status recorded at 25 weeks and 34 weeks 6. CO repeated at 36 weeks for all pregnant women 7. SATOD question on admission in labour 8. NRT provided for in-patients. 9. Electronic referral to (local SSS) at any time. 7

Multidisciplinary approach 1. Close working relationship with Smokefreelife, Public Health Nottinghamshire and Mansfield & Ashfield and Newark & Sherwood CCG. 2. Embedding smoking cessation in antenatal care provision ensures it is everyone’s responsibility 3. Collaborative working with the University of Nottingham. 8

Impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals with CO identification 1. Increased the numbers of referrals for smoking cessation support received by Smokefreelife. 2. Twice the number of women engaged with SSS support after implementation of the programme. 3. Doubling of the proportion of women who reported abstinence from smoking at one month. 4. 6% statistically significant increase in successful cessation among women who used SSS in the intervention period. 9

Impact of Risk Perception Intervention 1. Increase in birth weight centile amongst women who reduced their cigarette consumption, but who didn’t quit. 2. Women have reported that the direct approach of Risk Perception is what they required. The women didn’t previously know why smoking is harmful to the pregnancy and the baby. 3. 50% of women reported they were likely to quit smoking following the Risk Perception. It is acknowledged that the sample is small n=22. 4. Further 3% increase in successful smoking cessation to date. 10

SFHFT monthly reported SATOD data from the electronic maternity pathway ‘ORION’ A CORREL analysis of the data indicated a correlation coefficient of 0.47 for the full date range, suggesting a moderate relationship between SATOD and % stillbirth for the full period. There was a score of 0.75 for Q1 16/17 onwards, indicating the two variables are strongly related in the latter quarters. The small numbers associated with still births contributed to the volatility in the data. 11

Reflection and discussion 1. Seeing the baby for the first time and receiving a CO reading coupled with learning that high CO levels are harmful to the fetus, could have been an additional motivator for the women. 2. At SFHFT ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented by a small group of healthcare staff who were trained to national standards and received support afterwards; staff training and ongoing support may be necessary to ensure that new referral processes are effectively introduced. 12

3. The ’opt out’ pathway was implemented in addition to existing ‘opt in’ referrals, repeated referrals may have enhanced smokers’ motivation leading to improved cessation outcomes. 4. SFHFT redesigned the smoking in pregnancy pathway, embedding intensive specialist smoking cessation advice into routine antenatal care. 5. Motivational Interviewing is a powerful technique and must be conducted by appropriately qualified personnel to achieve a consistent outcome that empowers women to quit smoking. 13

Conclusions #1 1. There appears to be a link between SATOD and the incidence of stillbirth 2. The CO reading appears to have a motivational effect on the woman and appears to contribute to the reduction in SATOD 3. Staff training may have made a positive contribution to the effectiveness of the intervention 14

Conclusions #2 4. Anecdotal evidence appears to show that repeated referral may have contributed to smokers’ motivation and improved cessation outcomes 5. Embedding intensive specialist smoking cessation advice into routine antenatal care contributed to the positive outcomes 6. Motivational interviewing works best when conducted by appropriately qualified personnel 15

Recommendations and next steps 1. Further work is required to establish the link between SATOD, stillbirths and the impact of the CO reading intervention: - Update the SATOD and stillbirths data - Establish the costs associated with the intervention - Estimate the cost per avoided stillbirth 2. Continue to make resources available at SFHFT to gain further data and enhance further intervention learning 3. Conduct staff interviews to gain further insight into how the intervention is perceived by staff 4. Conduct interviews with women to gain further insight into how the intervention is perceived by them. 16

Thank you 17