Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECU Ombudsman Office We are here for you…. And you….. And you……
Advertisements

European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
Employment Webinar The grievance process, workplace disputes and the use of mediation.
NGSU Regional Councils – Oct/Nov 2014 Fair Treatment at Work Nationwide Group Staff Union.
Practicing With Professionalism.  The Florida Bar spotlight  Resources available to Florida Bar members  Disciplinary process  Avoiding/Limiting Bar.
Alabama Real Estate License Law & The REALTORS Code of Ethics
Human Rights Chapter 5. Human Rights Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment,
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
The Disciplinary Procedure Presented by Paula Fisher Practical HR Ltd.
Revenue Audits Returns processed in a “non-judgemental” manner Revenue Audit of selected returns. Objective is to promote voluntary tax compliance. Audit.
Regional conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, February, Belgrad,Serbia Albania’s Challenges.
Legal Executives By Lisa Incledon. Legal Executives Qualified lawyer Normally specialising in a particular area of law To be a fully qualified ‘Legal.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
The Employment Act 2008 – A Critical Overview Dispute Resolution & Tribunal Procedures: Overview of the New Procedures IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
Wayne County Bar Association August 15,  Rule 6.1 Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service A lawyer should render public interest legal service. A.
The independent and international business law firm of Warsaw Canons of professional ethics of legal advisers in Poland YLEP, Łochów 2009.
Please note that these slides provide a basic overview of the issues discussed within our presentation provided to CIPD members on 5 June If you.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
Human Rights. Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment, and to have equal access.
1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE FRENCH PUBLIC OVERSIGHT SYSTEM Vienna, 15 March 2006.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Disciplinary measures taken in cases of medical misconduct in the EU Member States Konstanty Radziwill CPME, Ethics and professional codes Subcomitee,
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
1 Reformatory Procedure in Administrative Cases - Sweden.
Student Council Training Eddie Rowley Students’ Union Liaison & Quality Coordinator.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
Copyright © 2008 by the Actuarial Board for Counseling and Discipline A Presentation by Michael Toothman, June 5, 2008 Actuarial Board for Counseling and.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities.
SUPPORTS YOU CAN CALL ON & BODIES THAT ARE DEALING WITH EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION.
Dr Jarosław Sułkowski.  Constitution of the Republic of Poland  the Act of 15 July 1987 on the Commissioner for Human Rights LEGAL ACTS.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
The Norwegian Bar Association 17 October, 2012 Harald B. Ciarlo, Lawyer NORLAM.
National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal By Dr P V S Jagan Mohan Rao M Com, LL B, FCS, FCMA, Ph D, MCJ (Master of communication & Journalism)
1 ETHICAL LAWYERING CLASS 3. 2 Cal. Bus. & Prof (a) Any person advertising or holding himself or herself out as practicing or entitled to practice.
STATE BAR OF TEXAS JULY 25, 2016 Section Chairs and Treasurers.
The Applicability of Patent-Agent Privilege After In re Queen’s University at Kingston Presented by Rachel Perry © 2016 Workman Nydegger.
GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
Doctor’s professional liability
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
Sexual Harassment Seminar
UAH Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures
Municipal Code Amendment Suspension of Utility Services for Violation of Specified Code Sections of the Pasadena Municipal Code City Council May 15,
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Agenda Relevant Turkish Legislation
The Federal Court System
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
COMPREHENSIVE RULES REVISIONS
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Ethics for Lawyers – and how that impacts your child’s case
Administering Human Rights Legislation
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LANGUAGE PRACTITIONERS COUNCIL ACT, 2014 (Act No. 8 of 2014) PRESENTED TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION & RECREATION.
Juliet Oliver, General Counsel
Chapter 11.
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
ANOC INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS WITHIN NATIONAL SYSTEMS PORTUGAL.
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
SPECIF ASPECTS OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING JUDGES
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE GROUNDS FOR DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY AND SANCTIONS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS:
(Francesca Cuomo Ulloa, Italy)
Disciplinary liability of judges in Romania
INTRODUCTION 1925: Created by Decree Law No. 406
Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
Alternative Dispute Resolutions in the Juvenile Justice System
Presentation transcript:

Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar By Patrick A. Dillen Immediate Past President - Brussels Bar (Dutch speaking section) Secretary-General FBE

Prevention Mediation of the President of the Bar Provisional and protective measures Disciplinary procedure Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

1. Prevention : Distribution of newsletters and info on website where it should be easily accessible Promotion of the role of the President as an ally in the exercise of your professional activity The lawyer who wants to do something, can ask his/her President who will : verify whether the proposed action is admissible in the light of professional rules & give advice to the lawyer & look together with the lawyer for a compliant way of achieving the lawyer’s goals In certain cases lobby to amend the rules in order to reconcile the lawyer’s proposed activity with the fundamental principles Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

Therefore the lawyer him/herself will address the President : This is voluntary but recommended if any doubts about compliance (examples) Mandatory in case of scope of the profession (New) seconded lawyers in the company (offices) of a client use of confidential correspondence in procedures (exceptional) agreements to work together (with lawyers and non- lawyers) issuing a writ or complaint against lawyers, bailiffs, notaries, magistrates being subjected to a seizure, writ or judicial complaint Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

Mediation of the President of the Bar Prevention Mediation of the President of the Bar Provisional and protective measures Disciplinary procedure Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

2. Mediation of the President of the Bar: People (lawyers or other) address the President about a problem which is not necessarily a breach of the Ethical Rules; i.e. Disagreement between partners or associates in a Firm Fees (this will be transferred to a commission : success rate = +/- 75 %) Communication problems between client and lawyer or non transmission of documents to the colleague who took over a case (this can be the indication the lawyer has a problem in which the Bar can help (the bar has a minimum income insurance, can delegate someone for temporarily support or have a Tutor appointed (seldom)) Incidents at hearings All non formal complaints/demands for intervention where the main interest of the client is that the problem gets solved Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

Provisional and protective measures Prevention Mediation of the President of the Bar Provisional and protective measures Disciplinary procedure Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

3. Provisional and protective measures: People (lawyers or other) address the President about a specific application of the Ethical Rules; i.e. Informal decision of the President of Bar (prepared by his/her cabinet) A question is raised by a Party – this is transmitted to the other Party for remarks - these remarks are transferred to the first Party for further remarks and accompanied by a first analysis – another round of remarks and the decision is taken. The parties could be heard if desired. The compliance with these decisions is 99,9% Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

3. Provisional and protective measures (next): Injunctions by the President of the Bar This is a more formal decision of the President (formal motivation, operative part …) Against these decisions proceedings before the ordinary courts would be possible (very rare) as a sort of second instance Non respect of an injunction (or an informal decision) is an infringement of the Ethics Code Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

3. Provisional and protective measures (next): “Court Ban” (seldom) = A prohibition to be present at the courts, tribunals or any judicial instance The lawyer has the right to be heard and has the possibility to present his defence The decision is taken by the President of the Bar and has to contain a motivation – max period is 3 months Possibility to prolong by the Council (same period) with possibility to be heard Second instance before Disciplinary Court of Appeal Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

3. Provisional and protective measures (next): Paternal/Maternal admonition – Mention in the personal file The lawyer has the right to be heard and has the possibility to present his defence The President, who is the only person who has the possibility to open a disciplinary investigation (see later), estimates the infringement is proven (mainly because of a confession) but it is not necessary to open an investigation (// Prosecutor = opportunity) Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

Disciplinary procedure Prevention Mediation of the President of the Bar Provisional and protective measures Disciplinary procedure Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

4. Disciplinary procedure: President will normally appoint a rapporteur (can also do the investigation himself) by letter send to lawyer concerned The letter will enumerate the investigated infringements and the measures the rapporteur can take in order to reveal the truth The rapporteur hears the plaintiff if he/she asks for it and the lawyer concerned. He/she can take all the measures enumerated in his appointment letter to reveal the truth He/she draws up a report with a proposal to the President as to the steps to take Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

4. Disciplinary procedure (next): The president can take the following decisions : The infringement is not proven or the facts were not an infringement of the Ethical Code The infringement is proven, but it is not heavy enough to send the case to the Disciplinary Board (in this case (s)he can issue a Paternal/maternal admonition) The infringement seems proven and he sends the case to the Disciplinary Board Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

4. Disciplinary procedure (next) : In case of inaction of the President or if the plaintiff doesn’t agree with the decision of the President he can seize the President of the Disciplinary Court who will investigate if the decision of the President of the Bar was justified and if not, he can bring the case himself before the Disciplinary Court (in which he will not sit) The Disciplinary Court (all Lawyers) can take decisions from a warning, a reprimand, a suspension or a removal. These sentences can be conditional. Appeal is possible at the Disciplinary Court of Appeal (presided by a magistrate in the court of Appeal and in the Presence of the Prosecutor near the Court of Appeal) Non-factual/legalistic grievances against the decision of the Disciplinary Court of Appeal, can be taken to the “Cour de Cassation” (Supreme Court). Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar

Some figures : Prevention and Disciplinary Sanctioning at the Brussels Bar 8.000 lawyers Total without Fee Fee Disciplinary complaints 2014 2.186 (697+1.489) 492 (312+180) 44 (10+34) 2015 2.429 (790+1.639) 434 (301+133) 83 (22+61) 2016 2.052= (678+1.374) 483 (320+163) 65 (13+52) Since 2016 the ombudsperson Ligeca also deals with grievances of clients and lawyers. (about 50 files/year)