Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Das_Figure S1 USP15 USP4 USP11 49% 60% 39 % 71 % 52 % 54 %
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Jamaal L. Benjamin, Rhea Sumpter, Beth Levine, Lora V. Hooper 
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
The UPEC Pore-Forming Toxin α-Hemolysin Triggers Proteolysis of Host Proteins to Disrupt Cell Adhesion, Inflammatory, and Survival Pathways  Bijaya K.
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Xanthomonas Type III Effector XopD Desumoylates Tomato Transcription Factor SlERF4 to Suppress Ethylene Responses and Promote Pathogen Growth  Jung-Gun.
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Smita Srivastava, Patricia S. Grace, Joel D. Ernst  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e7 (February 2018)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e7 (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Matthias P. Machner, Ralph R. Isberg  Developmental Cell 
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Recruits the Cellular Inositol Phosphatase SHIP2 to Regulate Actin-Pedestal Formation  Katherine Smith, Daniel Humphreys,
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Kohei Arasaki, Derek K. Toomre, Craig R. Roy  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Diversification of a Salmonella Virulence Protein Function by Ubiquitin-Dependent Differential Localization  Jayesh C. Patel, Karsten Hueffer, Tukiet.
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (May 2019)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 383-392 (December 2007) The Enteropathogenic E. coli Effector EspB Facilitates Microvillus Effacing and Antiphagocytosis by Inhibiting Myosin Function  Yosuke Iizumi, Hiroshi Sagara, Yasuaki Kabe, Motoki Azuma, Kanako Kume, Michinaga Ogawa, Takeshi Nagai, Peter G. Gillespie, Chihiro Sasakawa, Hiroshi Handa  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 383-392 (December 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of Myosin-1c as an EspB-Binding Protein (A) Preparation of recombinant His-EspB. Extracts of bacteria expressing His-EspB (Inp) and purified His-EspB (Elu) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and stained with CBB. (B) EspB-immobilized (+) or empty (−) beads were incubated with the cytoplasmic extracts of HeLa cells. Bound proteins were eluted with Laemmli dye and subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining. The stained bands were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion and Q-TOF MS analysis of the resultant peptides. This revealed that the protein was myosin-1c. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mapping of the Regions in Myosin-1c and EspB that Are Involved in Their Interaction by GST Pulldown Assays (A) Mapping of the region in myosin-1c that is bound by EspB. GST-myosin-1c deletion mutants were coupled to glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated with EspB-FLAG-His, and the bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody. Lane 1, 1% of the EspB-His-FLAG protein input (Inp). (B) The Kd for the binding of EspB-FLAG-His to myosin-1c mutant GST-mt4 was calculated by Scatchard analysis. (C) Effect of EspB on the interaction between myosin-1c and actin. Glutathione-Sepharose beads bearing the myosin-1c deletion mutant GST-mt4 were incubated with HeLa cell cytoplasmic extracts (as a source of actin) in the presence of the indicated amounts of EspB-FLAG-His protein, and the bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-actin antibody or anti-FLAG antibody. Lane 1, 1% of actin input (Inp). (D) Mapping of the region in EspB that binds to myosin-1c. Glutathione-Sepharose beads bearing the myosin-1c mutant GST-mt4 were incubated with FLAG-His-tagged EspB deletion mutants, and the bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody. Lanes 1–5, 1% of EspB mutant input (Inp). ∗The background corresponds to GST. (E) Aliment of the central region of EPEC, C. rodentium, or EHEC EspB. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Interaction between EspB and Myosin Superfamily Proteins (A) GST pulldown assays were performed to assess whether EspB binds to other myosins as well. The GST-tagged actin-interacting regions of myosin-1a, -2, -5, -6, and -10 were coupled to glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated with EspB-FLAG-His or EspB-Δmid-FLAG-His. The bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody. Inp, 1% of the EspB protein input (Inp). (B) EspB interacts with myosins in Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were infected for 3 hr with EPEC strains expressing myc epitope-tagged EspB or EspB-Δmid mutant. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-myc antibody and immunoblotted with anti-myosin-1c, -2, or -6, or myc antibody. (C) EspB colocalizes with myosin-2 in Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were infected with EPEC strains. Infected cells were stained with anti-EspB antibody (green) and anti-myosin-2 antibody (red). Two-color images were obtained by merging EspB and myosin-2 signals. Scale bar, 5 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Analysis of the TTSS Function of EPEC Strains (A) Protein translocation assays. HeLa cells were infected for 3 hr with EPEC strains. The bacterial extracts and translocated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-EspB, -EspF, -Map, or -actin antibody. (B and C) Involvement of the myosin-1c-binding domain of EspB on its TTSS function, on its ability to induce its host cell to form a pedestal (B), and as measured by the secretion of EspF (C). HeLa cells were infected with the different EPEC strains. To detect host cell pedestal formation (B), the cells were stained with anti-EPEC antiserum (green) and rhodamine-phalloidin for actin filaments (red). To detect mitochondrial EspF (C), the cells were stained with TO-PRO3 for bacteria (blue), anti-EspF antibody (green), and anti-mtHsp70 antibody (red). Scale bar, 5 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Myosin-Binding Region of EspB Is Essential for the Phagocytosis-Suppressing Effect of EPEC (A) Bone marrow-derived macrophages were infected for 60 min with EPEC WT, ΔespB, or espB-Δmid strain and analyzed by confocal microscopy. The GFP fluorescence indicates the total cell-associated bacteria (green), while the extracellular bacteria that adhere to the macrophages were stained with anti-EPEC antiserum (red). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Quantification of the results in Figure 5A. Means ± standard error of the mean from three independent experiments are shown. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Myosin-Binding Region of EspB Is Essential for EPEC-Mediated Microvillus Effacing SEM analysis of the differentiated Caco-2 cells infected with the indicated EPEC strains. Scale bar, 1 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Studies of Mice Infected with C. rodentium (A) Analysis of the ability of C. rodentium (CR) WT, ΔespB, and espB-Δmid to express and secrete EspB. The bacterial lysates and culture supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-EspB antibody. (B) Survival of mice infected by different CR strains. C3H/HeJ mice (n = 10) were orally infected with 4 × 105 CFU of CR strains and monitored daily until 22 days postinfection. The percentage of surviving mice is shown. (C) Number of adherent bacteria on the colon. C3H/HeJ mice (n = 3) were orally inoculated with the C. rodentium strains and sacrificed 8 days postinfection, and their colons were homogenized and plated on MacConkey agar plates. The colonies were counted to determine the number of bacteria adhering to the mouse colon. The data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean. (D) Typical SEM images of the colons of infected mice are shown. Scale bar, 1 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2007 2, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.012) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions