Shielding requirements for the baseline bunker shielding (current CATIA version ) Günter Muhrer www.europeanspallationsource.se.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to ASAC R. Casey Radiation Shielding: Assumption and Design April 24, 2007.
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.
Temporary shielding for the 20" vertical penetration Igor Rakhno November 17, 2008.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
R ULE 2 – T HE C OURT What You Need To Know. T HE C OURT AND M ARKINGS There shall be at least 6 feet of unobstructed space outside the boundary lines.
Highlights of RP activities in support of ISOLDE operation and projects Joachim Vollaire, Alexandre Dorsival and Christelle Saury with material from others.
The Status of ESS Accelerator Shielding and Accident Scenarios Lali Tchelidze May 26, 2014.
Blocking Below the Waist Clarifications – 2013 Revised 7/8/13 James D. Maconaghy Coordinator of Football Officials.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Shielding Calculations for NSLS2 Accelerators P.K. Job Radiation Physicist Peer Review 2007 March
LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview.
Instrument Construction Phase 1 and beyond Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer September, 2014.
DTU A VISION OF SUPPORTING NEUTRON CHOPPER ESS PT 1 - BUNKER SYSTEMS Discussion Document.
SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
Chapter 32Light: Reflection and Refraction
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
XL3 radiation Safety.
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Electron Beamlines Safety Workshop at ELI Beamlines April 2016
Blocking Below the Waist Clarifications
Free-Response-Questions
Graphic Communication
Section 1 Displacement and Velocity
Andreas Jansson, Lali Tchelidze
Updates on ESS Handbook for Radiation Protection
The Framers Gallery FRONT CENTER KITCHEN ENTRANCE BACK WC
Open Rack Specification 2.1 Update
Section 1 Displacement and Velocity
Air Rifle Range Layout Firing Line Range Officer Station
Operations, Risks & Hazards
NSS Instrument Project Tollgate Coordinator
1-2 Grounding Principles and CF Infrastructure in Instruments Halls
The Bunker Project Overview Zvonko Lazic
Monte Carlo simulations for the ODIN shielding at ESS
The Common Shielding Project
Roof PSS Bunker Project CDR
Rad safety and activation
MAGiC Shielding Simulations
Bunker Internal Review Welcome & Charge
Instruments Shielding Project Installation
Primary Spectrometer & Sample Environment
Senad Kudumovic Design engineer
Imaging & Engineering STAP Meeting 12th-13th of April 2018
The Mechanical Engineering & Technology (MET)
IKON 15 Talal Osman & Iain Sutton
Preliminary Hazard Analysis of Bunker
Technical Documentation Coordinator
Bunker Wall Design Wall
Radiation Protection Handbook
Bunker -Target interfaces
Neutronics questions from the PDR
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
Welcome Update on ESS Construction Project
Technical Updates Gábor László NSS Lead Instrument Engineer
NSS integrated installation plan workshop Introduction
Bunker Project Operation aspects
Bunker Project Schedule/Budget
The Bunker Project Overview Zvonko Lazic
Licensing update ESHAC #7, October 2017
Bunker Project Integration/Interfaces
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
Charge and Agenda of the 18th TAC meeting
Bunker Critical Design Review Welcome & Charge
Bunker Project Interfaces introduction
TRANSPORTATION CASK AND CONCRETE MODULE DESIGN FOR MANAGING NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL PRODUCED IN BUSHEHR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT A.M. TAHERIAN Iran Radioactive Waste.
Presentation transcript:

Shielding requirements for the baseline bunker shielding (current CATIA version ) Günter Muhrer www.europeanspallationsource.se

Shielding and activation requirement (baseline, as in CATIA) The inner ceiling height of the roof, excluding frames, shall be at least 170 cm above target center (TCS). The frame height shall be at least 150 cm above target centre. Based on input from NSS, CF designed the CF floor so that the bunker wall can start at a) 11.5 m, and b) 24.5 m from the origin of the target coordinate system (TCS). [ESS-0003382, ESS-0052649]. The dose in the freely accessible part of the instrument halls shall not exceed 3 mSv/h. The top of the bunker roof shall not be freely accessible. The instruments shall have free choice of optics inside the bunker with the following restrictions: Baseline : The maximum cross-section of the opening inside the monolith structure for the purpose of the neutronics design of the bunker shielding shall be 80 cm2. If an instrument (ESTIA) exceeds this requirement, it shall be the responsibility of the instrument team to proof compliance with this requirement. The NSS dose budget for the dose to the reference person at the site boundary, as stated in version 5 of the General Safety Objectives (GSO) [ESS-0000004], which was submitted to SSM with the 2nd application, is 5 mSv/year.

Shielding and activation requirement (baseline, as in CATIA) The physical access to the bunker shall be subdivided into two zones: an area inside R11.5 (inner side of the short wall and closer to the TCS) and an area outside R11.5. (The number is provisional, but can be used for the design, until NSS finalizes the distance.) The area outside R11.5 shall be physically accessible 1 day after beam shutdown as an unrestricted controlled area. (The number is provisional, but can be used for the design, until NSS finalizes the distance.) For the area inside R11.5, routine physical access is not envisioned, but occasional access may be necessary. In order to allow for this, the front part of the bunker shall be accessible within 3 days after beam shutdown, and the whole-body dose rates shall not exceed 0.25 mSv/h (This is needs to be communicated to target division.) (The number is provisional, but can be used for the design, until NSS finalizes the distance.) The requirement that the bunker shall not emit more radiation than 5 x 104 hadrons with energy greater than 10 MeV per square meter per second, is no longer valid for the bunker design and NSS shall address this question independent of the bunker project. The instrument teams shall show that they meet the activation requirements inside the bunker. In order to streamline the work and minimize the effort, they are strongly encouraged to stay within the boundaries and best practice described in [1]. If the instrument teams want to use materials not specified in [1] they may request ESS/NOSG to perform an activation calculation for that material, which NOSG would perform at the instrument project’s expense. [1]: https://confluence.esss.lu.se/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=220725475 The instrument shall ensure that the air activation in the bunker is limited to the level that the bunker can be operated as containment class C1.