DNA Transfer for Lawyers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Mixture Interpretations and Statistics – To Include or Exclude Cybergenetics © Prescription for Criminal Justice Forensics ABA Criminal Justice.
Advertisements

Finding Truth in DNA Mixture Evidence Innocence Network Conference April, 2013 Charlotte, NC Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA.
How Inclusion Interpretation of DNA Mixture Evidence Reduces Identification Information American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2013 Washington,
Creating informative DNA libraries using computer reinterpretation of existing data Northeastern Association of Forensic Scientists November, 2011 Newport,
Preventing rape in the military through effective DNA computing Forensics Europe Expo Forensics Seminar Theatre April, 2014 London, UK Mark W Perlin, PhD,
TrueAllele ® Casework Validation on PowerPlex ® 21 Mixture Data Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society September, 2014 Adelaide, South Australia.
Using TrueAllele ® Casework to Separate DNA Mixtures of Relatives California Association of Criminalists October, 2014 San Francisco, CA Jennifer Hornyak,
Revolutionising DNA analysis in major crime investigations The Investigator Conferences Green Park Conference Centre May, 2014 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
Revolutionising DNA analysis in major crime investigations The Investigator Conferences Green Park Conference Centre May, 2014 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
No DNA Left Behind: When "inconclusive" really means "informative" Schenectady County District Attorney’s Office January, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Revolutionising DNA analysis in major crime investigations The Investigator Conferences Green Park Conference Centre May, 2014 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
Solving Cold Cases by TrueAllele ® Analysis of DNA Evidence Finding Closure: The Science, Law and Politics of Cold Case Investigations October, 2014 Pittsburgh,
TrueAllele ® Mixture Interpretation Cybergenetics © th Annual DNA Technology Educational Seminar Centre of Forensic Sciences and the Promega.
DNA Mixture Statistics Cybergenetics © Spring Institute Commonwealth's Attorney's Services Council Richmond, Virginia March, 2013 Mark W.
Computer Interpretation of Uncertain DNA Evidence National Institute of Justice Computer v. Human June, 2011 Arlington, VA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD.
Challenging DNA Evidence The Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania Criminal Division February, 2015 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 2) Degraded DNA and Allele Dropout Cybergenetics Webinar November, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh,
Separating Familial Mixtures, One Genotype at a Time Northeastern Association of Forensic Scientists November, 2014 Hershey, PA Ria David, PhD, Martin.
Cybergenetics Webinar January, 2015 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 4)
Cracking the DNA mixture code – computer analysis of UK crime cases Forensics Europe Expo Forensic Innovation Conference April, 2014 London, UK Mark W.
Forensic Science & Criminal Law: Cutting Edge DNA Strategies Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers September, 2015 Hotel Monaco, Pittsburgh,
Unleashing Forensic DNA through Computer Intelligence Forensics Europe Expo Forensic Innovation Conference April, 2013 London, UK Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Rapid DNA Response: On the Wings of TrueAllele Mid-Atlantic Association of Forensic Scientists May, 2015 Cambridge, Maryland Martin Bowkley, Matthew Legler,
Getting Past First Bayes with DNA Mixtures American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2014 Seattle, WA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
Compute first, ask questions later: an efficient TrueAllele ® workflow Midwestern Association of Forensic Scientists October, 2014 St. Paul, MN Martin.
TrueAllele ® Computing: All the DNA, all the time Continuing Professional Development Sydney, Australia March, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
Murder in McKeesport October 25, 2008 Tamir Thomas.
When Good DNA Goes Bad International Conference on Forensic Research & Technology October, 2012 Chicago, Illinois Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
DNA Mapping the Crime Scene: Do Computers Dream of Electric Peaks? 23rd International Symposium on Human Identification October, 2012 Nashville, TN Mark.
Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © Duquesne University October, 2015 Pittsburgh, PA What’s in a Match?
Open Access DNA Database Duquesne University March, 2013 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
Objective DNA Mixture Information in the Courtroom: Relevance, Reliability & Acceptance NIST International Symposium on Forensic Science Error Management:
Death Needs Answers: The DNA Evidence Cybergenetics © Andrea Niapas Book Launch Pittsburgh, PA May, 2013 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
DNA-led investigation through computer interpretation of evidence Pennsylvania State Police Training Seminar Hershey, PA April, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD,
Separating DNA Mixtures by Computer to Identify and Convict a Serial Rapist Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Garett Sugimoto,
When DNA alone is not enough: exoneration by computer interpretation
Science & Sorcery in Forensic DNA Evidence
Four person DNA mixture
DNA: TrueAllele® Statistical Analysis, Probabilistic Genotyping
The Triumph and Tragedy of DNA Evidence
A Match Likelihood Ratio for DNA Comparison
Forensic Stasis in a World of Flux
Overcoming Bias in DNA Mixture Interpretation
Validating TrueAllele® genotyping on ten contributor DNA mixtures
Pioneers of Forensic Science
Justice Denied: Mr. Hopkins Invisible Semen
Shedding Light on Inconclusive DNA: TrueAllele® Computer Analysis
Explaining the Likelihood Ratio in DNA Mixture Interpretation
PCAST report • DNA mixture limits 3 contributors 20% fraction
Distorting DNA evidence: methods of math distraction
Machines can work it out: Automated TrueAllele® workflow
Solving sexual assault cases using DNA mixture evidence
Solving Crimes using MCMC to Analyze Previously Unusable DNA Evidence
Investigative DNA Databases that Preserve Identification Information
DNA Identification: Biology and Information
DNA Identification: Biology and Information
Forensic match information: exact calculation and applications
severed carotid artery
TrueAllele® computer technology
The Triumph and Tragedy of DNA Evidence
Probabilistic Genotyping to the Rescue for Pinkins and Glenn
Forensic validation, error and reporting: a unified approach
DNA Identification: Biology and Information
DNA Identification: Mixture Interpretation
Exonerating the Innocent with Probabilistic Genotyping
Testifying about probabilistic genotyping results
David W. Bauer1, PhD Nasir Butt2, PhD Jeffrey Oblock2
Using probabilistic genotyping to distinguish family members
Mining the Mixture: A DNA Analyst Explains (2)
Reporting match error: casework, validation & language
Presentation transcript:

DNA Transfer for Lawyers Continuing Legal Education Office of the Allegheny County District Attorney February, 2019 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD ® © Justice Through Science® 2019 Cybergenetics © 2007-2016

Unexpected DNA The Cat in the Hat holding an umbrella and speaking to a fish in its bowl from “The Cat in the Hat”. It should not be here It should not be about DNA won’t appear When the suspect is out!

Random match probability Simple match statistic for simple DNA evidence

DNA mixture eye of newt toe of frog Double, double toil and trouble

Pittsburgh skyline

Draw a threshold

Same heights & vacant lots

Simplify data to interpret mixture Apply threshold to find “alleles” Add allele frequencies (f1 + f2 + …) Square sum, take reciprocal Locus “probability of inclusion” (PI) Multiply locus PI values Combined (CPI) match statistic

Accurate, unbiased computing

DNA transfer Don’t fear DNA Laughed the clever defense The Cat in the Hat holding a pink-stained shirt in a bathtub from “The Cat in the Hat Comes Back”. Don’t fear DNA Laughed the clever defense When it transfers we say That it’s not evidence!

DNA transfer Lawyers argue Scientists test

Wet DNA transfer

Dry DNA transfer END

Justice Denied: Mr. Hopkins Invisible Semen 18 Justice Denied: Mr. Hopkins Invisible Semen American Investigative Society of Cold Cases AISOCC Annual Conference June, 2016 St. Louis, MO Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2016 Cybergenetics © 2003-2011

1979 murder of Janet Walsh • 23 year old woman • Monaca, Pennsylvania • strangled with bandana • face down in her bed • nightshirt top only • bathrobe tie on hands • divorcing husband • multiple partners Janet Walsh

The crime scene blue nightshirt bathrobe tie Viewed as homicide, not sex crime

Prosecutor theory • sexual misadventure • man straddling woman • bandana asphyxiation • ejaculates, and hits nightshirt & robe tie • explains coincidental location on two items Frank Martocci How and when the DNA got there (unusual expert testimony)

Defense theory • Hopkins wasn’t there when Walsh died • old DNA from before • no coincidences • DNA is expected • no semen on hands • with prior sexual relations,     DNA is not probative Hon. James Ross DNA doesn’t say how or when it was left (typical expert testimony)

DNA transfer Increases with: • moisture • pressure • friction • absorbent     cotton material

From nightshirt to robe tie • Walsh struggled, perspired • back moist, shirt wet • old semen stain on shirt • wet shirt moistens robe tie • pressure and friction from     tied hands behind back • sperm moves from shirt     to bathrobe tie • DNA detected years later END

Computer Interpretation of Quantitative DNA Evidence Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Carlos Harris August, 2017 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2017 Cybergenetics © 2007-2016

26

DNA biology Cell Chromosome Locus Nucleus

allele length is 10 repeats Short tandem repeat DNA locus paragraph Take me out to the ball game take me out with the crowd buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack I don't care if I never get back let me root root root root root root root root root root for the home team, if they don't win, it's a shame
for it's one, two, three strikes, you're out at the old ball game 23 volumes in cell's DNA encyclopedia "root" repeated 10 times, so allele length is 10 repeats

DNA genotype 10, 12 A genetic locus has two DNA sentences, one from each parent. An allele is the number of repeated words. locus A genotype at a locus is a pair of alleles. mother allele 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10, 12 ACGT repeated word Many alleles allow for many many allele pairs. A person's genotype is relatively unique. father allele 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

DNA evidence interpretation Lab Infer Evidence item Evidence data Evidence genotype 10, 12 10 11 12 DNA from one person Compare Known genotype 10, 12

DNA mixture interpretation Lab Infer Evidence item Evidence data Evidence genotype 10, 11 @ 20% 11, 11 @ 30% 11, 12 @ 50% 10 11 12 DNA from two people Compare Known genotype 11, 12

Computers can use all the data Quantitative peak heights at locus D7S820 peak size peak height

How the computer thinks Consider every possible genotype solution Better explanation has a higher likelihood Explain the peak pattern

How the computer thinks Consider every possible genotype solution Better explanation has a higher likelihood Explain the peak pattern

How the computer thinks Consider every possible genotype solution Better explanation has a higher likelihood Explain the peak pattern

How the computer thinks Consider every possible genotype solution Better explanation has a higher likelihood Explain the peak pattern

How the computer thinks Consider every possible genotype solution Worse explanation has a lower likelihood

Evidence genotype Objective genotype determined solely from the DNA data. Never sees a comparison reference. 45% 37% 10% 8%

How much more does the suspect match the evidence DNA match information How much more does the suspect match the evidence than a random person? Prob(evidence match) Prob(coincidental match) 9x 45% 5%

Match information at 15 loci

Is the suspect in the evidence? A match between the Glock pistol slide serrations and Carlos Harris is: 221 billion times more probable than a coincidental match to an unrelated African-American person 62.9 billion times more probable than a coincidental match to an unrelated Caucasian person 133 billion times more probable than a coincidental match to an unrelated Hispanic person

Match statistics 6.51 million 62.9 billion Item Description 28 Daren Scott 35 Carlos Harris 36 Michael Shipps-Smith 37 Jaron Satterwhite 18A1 Glock pistol frame 6.51 million 18B1 Opening and follower of the magazine 20A Glock pistol slide serrations 62.9 billion

Match statistics END 6.81 10.80 Item Description 28 Daren Scott 35 Carlos Harris 36 Michael Shipps-Smith 37 Jaron Satterwhite 18A1 Glock pistol frame 6.81 18B1 Opening and follower of the magazine 20A Glock pistol slide serrations 10.80 END

44

45 Wet DNA transfer END

Computer Interpretation of Quantitative DNA Evidence Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Defendant April, 2018 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W. Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2018 Cybergenetics © 2007-2018

Match statistics 2.21 quadrillion 9.29 thousand Item Description K1 Victim K2 Defendant K3 Elimination Q3M Underwear, sperm fraction 2.21 quadrillion 9.29 thousand

END

Computer Interpretation of Quantitative DNA Evidence State of Georgia v. Johnny Lee Gates May, 2018 Columbus, GA Mark W. Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2018 Cybergenetics © 2007-2018

Match statistics one in 1.5 million one in 134 thousand Item Description 76C2573-004 Johnny Lee Gates 76C2573-032 robe belt side 1 swab one in 1.5 million 76C2573-033 robe belt side 2 swab one in 134 thousand 76C2573-034 front of black tie swab one in 4.33 million 76C2573-035 back of black tie swab one in 963 million 76C2573-042 robe belt M-vac filter one in 902 trillion 76C2573-044 black tie M-vac filter one in 825 billion

51 END

Computer Interpretation of Quantitative DNA Evidence Commonwealth of Virginia v. Bernard Duse, Jr. August, 2018 Warrenton, VA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2018 Cybergenetics © 2007-2018

Match statistics 227 octillion 40.6 quintillion Item Description 19 Rex Olsen 65 Bernard Duse, Jr. 13 Pants pocket 227 octillion 40.6 quintillion

54 END

Computer Interpretation of Quantitative DNA Evidence People of California v. John Doe March, 2019 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2019 Cybergenetics © 2007-2019

Are the references in the evidence? Based on the TrueAllele results, comparing all evidence with all references produced exclusionary match statistics.

57 END

TrueAllele® interpretation 58 TrueAllele® interpretation http://www.cybgen.com/information • Courses • Newsletters • Newsroom • Presentations • Publications • Webinars http://www.youtube.com/user/TrueAllele TrueAllele YouTube channel perlin@cybgen.com