Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting Thanos Athanasiou, PhD, Omer Aziz, MBBS, Petros Skapinakis, MS, PhD, Branco Perunovic, MD, Jonathan Hart, MBBS, Mary-Claire Crossman, MRCS, Vassilis Gorgoulis, PhD, Brian Glenville, FRCS, Roberto Casula, FECTS The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages 2141-2146 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01435-8
Fig 1 Meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting for wound infection rates. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2003 76, 2141-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01435-8)
Fig 2 Funnel plot. (SE[LOG OR] = standard error [log odds ratio].) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2003 76, 2141-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01435-8)
Fig 3 Meta-analysis of endoscopic minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting for wound infection rates. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2003 76, 2141-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01435-8)