Rick Field - Florida/CDF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,
Advertisements

IMFP Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.
ISMD 2005 August 11, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005 Rick Field University of Florida (for.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
University of California, Berkeley January 13, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
2015 London, September 1, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.
MC4LHC Workshop July 17-26, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDFPage 1 Monte Carlos for the LHC Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 MC4LHC Tuning the Monte-Carlo.
Perugia, Italy October 27, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 28, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.
2010 Glasgow, November 30, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk  Discuss the.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.
TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 20, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 TeV4LHC Workshop Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 Talk #1.
ISMD2004 July 27, 2004 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Rick Field (theorist?) “Jet Formation in QCD”
Energy Dependence of the UE
YETI’11: The Standard Model at the Energy Frontier
The LHC Physics Environment
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR
1st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions
“softQCD” and Correlations Rick Field & Nick Van Remortel
Physics and Techniques of Event Generators
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Lake Louise Winter Institute
MB&UE Working Group Meeting UE Lessons Learned & What’s Next
University of Chicago Lecture 3: Tuning the Models
PHZ 6358 Fall 2011 The Modeling of the Underlying Event Rick Field
A Closer Look at the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)
MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS UE Data and the New Tune Z1
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Energy Dependence of the “Underlying Event” Craig Group & David Wilson
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Early Physics Measurements University of Florida October 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at CDF
Monte-Carlo Generators for CMS
Min-Bias and the Underlying Event in Run 2
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
The Tevatron Connection
XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
Monte Carlos for the LHC
XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
The LHC Physics Environment
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF
RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting
CDF Run 2 Monte-Carlo Tunes
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
Multiple Parton Interactions and the Underlying Event
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions
QCD Monte-Carlo Generators in Run 2 at CDF
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Review of the QCD Monte-Carlo Tunes
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
The “Underlying Event” at CDF and CMS
Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

Rick Field - Florida/CDF TeV4LHC Workshop Talk #2 Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

Recent CDF Run 2 “Underlying Event” Results The “underlying event” consists of hard initial & final-state radiation plus the “beam-beam remnants” and possible multiple parton interactions. “Transverse” region is very sensitive to the “underlying event”! New CDF Run 2 results (L = 385 pb-1) : Two Classes of Events: “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back”. Two “Transverse” regions: “transMAX”, “transMIN”, “transDIF”. Data Corrected to the Particle Level: unlike our previous CDF Run 2 “underlying event” analysis which used JetClu to define “jets” and compared uncorrected data with the QCD Monte-Carlo models after detector simulation, this analysis uses the MidPoint jet algorithm and corrects the observables to the particle level. The corrected observables are then compared with the QCD Monde-Carlo models at the particle level. For the 1st time we study the energy density in the “transverse” region. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

The “Transverse” Regions as defined by the Leading Jet Look at the density of charged particles and calorimeter towers in the “transverse” region. Charged Particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) Calorimeter Towers (ET > 0.1 GeV, |h| < 1) “Transverse” region is very sensitive to the “underlying event”! Look at charged particle and calorimeter tower correlations in the azimuthal angle Df relative to the leading calorimeter jet (MidPoint, R = 0.7, fmerge = 0.75, |h| < 2). Define |Df| < 60o as “Toward”, 60o < -Df < 120o and 60o < Df < 120o as “Transverse 1” and “Transverse 2”, and |Df| > 120o as “Away”. Each of the two “transverse” regions have area DhDf = 2x60o = 4p/6. The overall “transverse” region is the sum of the two transverse regions (DhDf = 2x120o = 4p/3). TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

Charged Particle Density Df Dependence Refer to this as a “Leading Jet” event Subset Refer to this as a “Back-to-Back” event Look at the “transverse” region as defined by the leading jet (|h| < 2) or by the leading two jets (|h| < 2). “Back-to-Back” events are selected to have at least two jets with Jet#1 and Jet#2 nearly “back-to-back” (Df12 > 150o) with almost equal transverse momenta (PT(jet#2)/PT(jet#1) > 0.8) and PT(jet#3) < 15 GeV/c. Shows the Df dependence of the charged particle density, dNchg/dhdf, for charged particles in the range pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 1 relative to jet#1 (rotated to 270o) for 30 < ET(jet#1) < 70 GeV for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“Transverse” Observables Particle and Detector Level “Leading Jet” Observable Particle Level Detector Level dNchg/dhdf Number of charged particles per unit h-f (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) Number of “good” charged tracks dPTsum/dhdf Scalar pT sum of charged particles per unit h-f Scalar pT sum of “good” charged tracks per unit h-f <pT> Average pT of charged particles Average pT of “good” charged tracks PTmax Maximum pT charged particle PTmax = 0 for no charged particle Maximum pT “good” charged tracks PTmax = 0 for no “good” charged track dETsum/dhdf Scalar ET sum of all particles (all pT, |h| < 1) Scalar ET sum of all calorimeter towers (ET > 0.1 GeV, |h| < 1) PTsum/ETsum Scalar pT sum of charged particles divided by the scalar ET sum of all particles (all pT, |h| < 1) Scalar pT sum of “good” charged tracks calorimeter towers (ET > 0.1 GeV, |h| < 1) “Back-to-Back” TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransDIF” PTsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” “transDIF” is very sensitive to the “hard scattering” component of the “underlying event”! Use the leading jet to define the MAX and MIN “transverse” regions on an event-by-event basis with MAX (MIN) having the largest (smallest) charged PTsum density. Shows the “transDIF” = MAX-MIN charge PTsum density, dPTsum/dhdf, for pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1 versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransMAX/MIN” Nchg Density PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the charged particle density, dNchg/dhdf, in the “transMAX” and “transMIN” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransMAX/MIN” PTsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the charged PTsum density, dPTsum/dhdf, in the “transMAX” and “transMIN” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“Transverse” <PT> and <PTmax> PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the average transverse momentum, <PT>, and <PTmax> for charged particles in the “transverse” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransMAX/MIN” ETsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the ETsum density, dETsum/dhdf, in the “transMAX” and “transMIN” region (all particles |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“Transverse” Charged Fraction PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the PTsum/ETsum in the “transverse” region versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events, where PTsum is the scalar PT sum of charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) and ETsum is the scalar ET sum of all particles (|h| < 1). Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransDIF” ETsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs HERWIG “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” “transDIF” is very sensitive to the “hard scattering” component of the “underlying event”! Use the leading jet to define the MAX and MIN “transverse” regions on an event-by-event basis with MAX (MIN) having the largest (smallest) charged PTsum density. Shows the “transDIF” = MAX-MIN ETsum density, dETsum/dhdf, for all particles (|h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransMAX/MIN” ETsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs JIMMY JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in the “transverse” region for “leading jet” events! “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the ETsum density, dETsum/dhdf, in the “transMAX” and “transMIN” region (all particles |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and a tuned version of JIMMY (with MPI, PTJIM = 3.25 GeV/c, default = 2.5 GeV/c) at the particle level. JIMMY: MPI J. M. Butterworth J. R. Forshaw M. H. Seymour TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

JIMMY Runs with HERWIG and adds multiple parton interactions! JIMMY at CDF JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in the “transverse” region for “leading jet” events! The Energy in the “Underlying Event” in High PT Jet Production JIMMY: MPI J. M. Butterworth J. R. Forshaw M. H. Seymour PT(JIM)= 2.5 GeV/c. PT(JIM)= 3.25 GeV/c. “Transverse” <Densities> vs PT(jet#1) TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransMAX/MIN” PTsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs JIMMY “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the charged PTsum density, dETsum/dhdf, in the “transMAX” and “transMIN” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and a tuned version of JIMMY (with MPI, PTJIM = 3.25 GeV/c) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“TransMAX/MIN” Nchg Density PYTHIA Tune A vs JIMMY “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the charged particle density, dNchg/dhdf, in the “transMAX” and “transMIN” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and a tuned version of JIMMY (with MPI, PTJIM = 3.25 GeV/c) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“Transverse” <PT> PYTHIA Tune A vs JIMMY “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the charged particle <PT> in the “transverse” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG and a tuned version of JIMMY (with MPI, PTJIM = 3.25 GeV/c) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

“Transverse” PTsum Density PYTHIA Tune A vs JIMMY “Leading Jet” “Back-to-Back” Shows the charged PTsum density in the “transverse” region (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) versus PT(jet#1) for “Leading Jet” and “Back-to-Back” events. Compares the (corrected) data with PYTHIA Tune A (with MPI) and HERWIG and a tuned version of JIMMY (with MPI, PTJIM = 3.25 GeV/c) at the particle level. TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

Rick Field - Florida/CDF Summary Particle Level Data: CDF has new data on the “underlying event” that is corrected to the particle level so that it can be used to tune the QCD Monte-Carlo models without requiring CDF detector simulation! Interesting Physics: We see interesting dependence of the “underlying event” on the transverse momentum of the leading jet (i.e. the Q2 of the hard scattering). For the “leading jet” case the “transMAX” densities rise with increasing PT(jet#1), while for the “back-to-back” case they fall. The rise in the “leading jet” case is due to hard initial and final-state radiation, which has been suppressed in the “back-to-back” events. The “back-to-back” data show a decrease in the “transMIN” densities with increasing PT(jet#1) which is very interesting. PYTHIA Tune A does not produce enough energy in the “underlying event”! JIMMY 325 (PTJIM = 3.25 GeV/c) fits the energy in the “underlying event” but does so by producing too many particles (i.e. it is too soft). We are making good progress in understanding and modeling the “underlying event”. However, we do not yet have a perfect fit to all the features of the “underlying event”! TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF

The Future Some CDF-QCD Group Analyses! Much more QCD physics to come from the Tevatron! Some CDF-QCD Group Analyses! Jet Cross Sections and Correlations: MidPoint and KT algorithms with L = 1 fb-1! DiJet Mass Distributions: Df distribution, compositness. Heavy Flavor Jets: b-jet and b-bbar jet cross sections and correlations. Z and W Bosons plus Jets: including b-jets. Jets Fragmentation: jet shapes, momentum distributions, two-particle correlations. Underlying Event Studies: distributions as well as averages for charged particles and energy for jet, jet+jet, g+jet, Z+jet, and Drell-Yan. Pile-Up Studies: modeling of pile-up. Monte-Carlo Tuning: New Run 2 PYTHIA tune?, tuned JIMMY, PYTHIA 6.3, Sherpa, etc.. Analyses using 1fb-1 of data by Winter 2006! TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 21, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDF