Wearable Interface 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AN OVERVIEW BY JAMIE STARKE The Role of Prototyping.
Advertisements

Robotics Intensive: Day 6 Gui Cavalcanti 1/17/2012.
P11228 Week 2 Japh Learn Joseph Corea Tim Monahan Bryan Reinheimer Ed Gliss.
P11310: Parabolic Dish Autopoint Solution Project Family Team Leader: Trae Rogers (ME) Project Engineer: Pat Ryan (EE) Kyle Norlin (ME) Chris Reed (CE)
What is a good length of string? –Depends on its use How do you design a good length of string? –Can be determined by a process What is a good user interface?
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
P09651 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System Lead: Dave Lewis Brian Russell Aditi Khare.
ASME Oral Presentation Competition Stevens Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Dept. Senior Design 2005~06 April 1 st, 2006 Presented By: Lazaro.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Arduino Project Street Guardian Alex Castan-Latham John Garner Rebecca Newton.
 Team Members: ◦ Pattie Schiotis – Team Manager (ME) ◦ Shane Reardon – Lead Engineer (ME) ◦ Dana Kjolner (EE) ◦ Robert Ellsworth (EE) ◦ Sam Hosig (CE)
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
Chapter 4 Requirements Engineering
S/W Project Management
© 2005 Virtue Ventures LLC. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License Feasibility Analysis For Social Enterprise.
1 Chapter 2 Socio-technical Systems (Computer-based System Engineering)
HCI Prototyping Chapter 6 Prototyping. Learning Outcomes At the end of this lecture, you should be able to: –Define the term “prototyping” –Explain the.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Professor Hollot Team RCA March 1, 2013 Cumulative Design Review.
CSCD 487/587 Human Computer Interface Winter 2013 Lecture 3 HCI and Interactive Design.
ADVANCED DESIGN APPLICATIONS UNIT 4 - MANUFACTURING © 2015 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, Learning Cycle Three – Looping.
Robert Simon, Coleman Hostetler, Aashay Sukhthankar, Devin Moore.
Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project Charles Alexander, Tom Christen, Kim Maier, Reggie Pierce, Matt Fister, Zach Mink Underwater Thermoelectric Power.
Slide 1 Requirements Determination Chapter 5. Slide 2 Objectives ■ Understand how to create a requirements definition. ■ Become familiar with requirements.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 09/10/15.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Project Selection And Needs Identification
R. I. T Multidisciplinary Senior Design Phase-Appropriate Feasibility Analysis Rochester Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Department Rochester,
The Wingman: Self-Spotting Bench Press Students: Chris Potts (EE) & Lane Caffaro (ME) Project Supervisors: Professor John Spinelli (EE) & Professor Jennifer.
 RoboFish 3.1: Navigation and Tail Redesign MSD Team Week 3 Review Presentation.
Testing Considerations Because of potential life threatening consequences resulting from device malfunction, it is critical that the device be fully tested.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Team P15441 Mini Air Daniel Probst Usama Haq Nathan Serfass Joshua Erbland Alexander Cornell 2/10/15P
Requirement engineering & Requirement tasks/Management. 1Prepared By:Jay A.Dave.
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Zachary FoggettiBridget Kearney Dalton MeadRuishi Shen Michael WarrenThomas Wossner.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 10/01/15.
MAPS for the Future An Introduction to Person- Centered Planning Katie Shepherd, Fall 2009.
ORT Braude College – Software Engineering Department WristQue: A Personal Sensor Wirstband Brian D. Mayton, Nan Zhao, Matt Aldrich, Nicholas Gillian, and.
PDS. Contents  Introduction  Definitions  1) Performance 1.0 Function 2.0 Appearance 3.0 Reliability 4.0 Environment 5.0 Ergonomics 6.0 Quality 7.0.
Smart Cane – P14043 Lauren Bell, Jessica Davila, Jake Luckman, William McIntyre, Aaron Vogel.
With. Project Overview  Introduction to Factory Automation Numerical Control  Build an autonomous robotic solution  Testing an autonomous robot build.
Data Synthesis and Analysis
Wearable Technology Rapid Development
The Four-legged Water Walker
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design
CMPE 280 Web UI Design and Development August 29 Class Meeting
The process of interaction design Chapter
Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT)
Multidisciplinary Senior Design I: Problem Definition Review
Right Move, Right Place, Right Time
P14551: Multi-Process 3-D Printer
User Stories Applied, Mike Cohn Chapter 1: An Overview
HEMODYNAMIC SIMULATOR II P09026
P15073: Autonomous IV Stand Michael Binger, Caitlin Conway, Nick Goddard, Nicholas Jacobs, Christina Pysher, & Ethan Whritenor Mike September 11, 2014.
WEARABLE ELECTRONICS.
Tub Lift Rev. 2 Dom Group
MINGGU KE 9: PROSES DESAIN PRODUK BARU
Multidisciplinary Senior Design I
The Role of Prototyping
P17001: Wearable Interface Design Iterations Team Intro & Background
Tub Lift Rev. 2 Dom Group
Heart Pump and the Circulatory System P17080
By the end of this chapter, you should:
Conjoint analysis.
P11017 Tactile Navigation Interface
THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN
Cnc machine Presented By:.
P18325: Automated Breast Pump Cleaning System (Team ABC’s)
Detailed Design Review: P18001
COMP444 Human Computer Interaction Prototyping
Presentation transcript:

Wearable Interface 3

Agenda Introduce Team Team Values Problem Statement Use Scenario Customer Requirements Engineering Requirements Risk Management Project Planning Questions & Comments

Team Introductions Name Major Role Willow Baker ME Project Manager Alice Fischer CE Technical Writer Vincent Yu IE Lead Purchaser Sarah Kordiyak EE Fabricator Nick Breeman EE PCB Lead Designer Tim Preskenis BME Facilitator Jonathan Hoey EE Lead Engineer

Team Values Punctuality Communication Being open to other ideas Speaking up if confused Doing assigned work Sharing ideas if you have them Respect each other and the project Honesty Check in regularly

Problem Statement Project Description Current State Desired State Phones are something that require full attention to interact with, causing people to be distracted when using them. If the person is walking while using their phone this can be a problem. The idea of this device is to allow the user to be paying attention to their surroundings and have their hands free while still be interacting with their phone through a device worn on one hand that is used to input commands through certain motions. Current State Prototypes that were created in previous years that are too large, uncomfortable, and do not work very well. Desired State The device should be small, comfortable, and respond well to the inputs it is given without being too distracting to the wearer. Project Goals Decide on a sensor type Going through the older model and seeing what is usable

Use Scenario

Customer Requirements We separated customer requirements into categories and assigned them each an Importance ranking. We also assigned a Feasibility rating that denotes how confident we as a team feel about our chances at accomplishing that task. Each of these uses a 1-3-6-9 scoring system with 9 being very important / very feasible. Priority is an additive combination of these scores, and serves as an overall score that we can organize requirements with. For example, SF2 pertains to battery protection circuits. This is very important to ensure the safety of the user and product, and is also very simple to integrate, so it gets a maximum Priority of 18. The primary customer needs boil down to the categories shown. Functionality and performance fall under electrical engineering, while durability and comfort are on more of the biomed / mechanical side of things. Aesthetic design is also something to be considered, as this is a product that aims to be a consumer device, and competition already exists.

Engineering Requirements rqmt. # Importance Source Engr. Requirement (metric) Unit of Measure Marginal Value Ideal Value Direction of Improvement ER1 9 CV7 Communication Delay ms 300 100 Minimize ER2 6 CV6 Battery Life hr 8 Maximize ER3 1 CV3 Recharge Rate 2 Minimize* ER4 3 CV4,CF2 Weight oz. 20 14-16 ER5 CV4, CF2, CF3 Vertical Profile mm 12 ER6 CF3, CF5 Adjustability Range of inches 8" to 10" 6" to 12" ER7 CV5,CF1 Comfort ER8 CV2, FN4 Amount of possible controls Number of inputs 27 70 ER9 DR2,SF4,DR1 Durability J / m² ER10 CF4 Removal / Equip time s. 30 5 *Charging faster than 1C can be dangerous The qualitative customer requirements are translated into quantifiable engineering requirements here. Each requirement here refers to the corresponding customer requirement and gives some rough numbers about what we think we can realistically accomplish (Marginal Value), what we hope to accomplish (Ideal Value), and the direction we should be working towards. These are also given a 1-3-6-9 Importance rating based on the customer requirement importance ratings and how we as engineers view the severity of each issue.

Risk Management https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V3HGLrmImYn-ShXHnaZ-S27f1QRiv9EzSqq_IOD-y0A/edit#gid=0

Project Planning

Questions or Comments?