Claire Vincent - EHS United Kingdom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Advertisements

MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Surface.
October 31 st, 2007 – “BLACK SEA CELEBRATION DAY” - CONSTANTA.
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Austrian Approach for Identification of Water Bodies Workshop on Identification of Surface Water Bodies Brussels, 25/26 September 2003 Birgit Vogel Austrian.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs WATER BODIES AND TYPOLOGIES Component 2 INCEPTION WORKSHOP ANKARA February María.
Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
CIS - Project 2.4 Transitional and Coastal Waters
Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
Draft Commission Decision on Intercalibration
EU Water Framework Directive
Workshop Objectives To update COAST on progress
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
WG ECOSTAT: Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
WG 2.9 Best Practices in River Basin Planning
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Rome, 12nd June
COAST Intercalibration Types Ispra March
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
EU Water Framework Directive
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Coastal and transitonal waters in the Scheldt River Basin
Drafting group Mixing Zones
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Scaldit: Scaldis Integrated Testing
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
Meeting of Water Directors 2/3 December 2004
Which is the real scope of the Guidance ?
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Main blocks of discussion
Reporting units for MSFD assessments
CIS - Project 2.4 Transitional and Coastal Waters Den Haag Summary 1
on Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and
EU Water Framework Directive
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Swedish views on the revision of the WFD reporting sheets for the next reporting cycle Niklas Holmgren Assistant Director Competent Authority of South.
Conservation Guidance Concept Form
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
North Atlantic Ocean 2 global climatic zones
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Status of the Nutrient Best Practice Guide
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Typology for fully saline waters
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Guidance document on the identification of water bodies
Article 13 RBMP Schema.
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
Water Bodies Shannon Pilot River Basin
A general introduction
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Brussels, 5th May
CIS - Project 2.4 Transitional and Coastal Waters
WISE GIS Group 15 January 2008 John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

Claire Vincent - EHS United Kingdom North East Atlantic Typology Workshop CIS Project 2.4 Transitional and Coastal Waters Claire Vincent - EHS United Kingdom

Introduction Objectives and how we got here Common Understanding of Terms water bodies types categories The Task

Objectives To establish a common framework for typology of transitional and coastal waters across the North East Atlantic Ecoregion Complex (Annex XI) Atlantic Ocean Norwegian Sea Barents Sea North Sea

Objectives (continued) To identify the key option factors in Annex II to define a physical typology system that is ecologically relevant. To inform the ecoregion workshops for the Baltic and the Mediterranean Workshops in December. To enable typology guidance to be finalised by January 2002.

Compare like with like Typology Physiological types that are ecologically relevant Ecological quality:- Compare like with like

How did we get here? Conclusions Brussels Workshop, September, 2001 System B (with the exception of MSs with very simplex coastline) Biggest factor to differentiate ecoregion types is salinity and tidal regime (simplex/complex) Baltic North East Atlantic Mediterranean To develop guidance further - ecoregion level

Principles agreed…. As simple a typology as is practicable and ecologically relevant Number of types NE Atlantic? (10-20) 10 too few 50-60 too complex It is recognised that a simple typology will need to be countered with ranges in reference conditions

Reference Conditions EuroTypes A B C E D The European Sea

Need for Common Understanding: Water bodies Water body categories (transitional & coastal) Water body types Scale??

Surface Water Bodies Body of surface water means a discrete and significant element of surface water such as a lake, a reservoir, a stream, river or canal, part of a stream, river or canal, a transitional water or a stretch of coastal water. Classification/management unit of the Directive Smallest unit of Directive

Surface Water Categories: Surface water bodies within the RBD shall be identified as falling within either one of the following surface water categories - rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal water - or as artificial surface water bodies or heavily modified surface water bodies Surface water categories - transitional or coastal water bodies

Surface Water Types For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be differentiated according to type. These types are those defined using either system A or system B identified in section 1.2. Types - Annex II system A or system B

Category: Transitional Water Type: N-E Atlantic Muddy Estuary Category: River Type: Lowland Calcareous Category: Coastal Water Type: Exposed, shallow Gravel / Sand

Surface Water Bodies Body of surface water means a discreet and significant element of surface water such as a lake, a reservoir, a stream, river or canal, part of a stream, river or canal, a transitional water or a stretch of coastal water. Classification/water management unit of the Directive

Industry Category: Transitional Water Type: N-E Atlantic Muddy Estuary

Industry Category: Transitional Water Type: N-E Atlantic Muddy Estuary

Brussels Question? Why not identify this as two separate physical types inner NE Atlantic muddy estuary outer NE Atlantic muddy estuary Do we need lots and lots of types to meet the objectives of the Directive?

i.e. Good Status Spirit of the Directive is to concentrate effort on water bodies that are not meeting ecological objectives i.e. Good Status

Brussels Question? Can a water body be bigger than a type? No Because the reference conditions are specific to each type Classification/management unit of the Directive Smallest unit of Directive

The Task To develop a common framework for typology Presentations on progress to date Presentations on other possible approaches Identification of the key optional factors How should key optional factors be used

NE Atlantic Typology