Presented To: College Planning Council

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRAC and Integrated Planning October 22, Integrated Planning Model.
Advertisements

State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
Quality and San Juan College Dr. Carol Spencer. About San Juan College.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
Dr. Otto W.K. Lee President August 27, 2015 Celia Parra, Student Speaker, 2015 Commencement.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Updated Strategic Plan Presented to Reedley College Fall Classified Assembly Marilyn Behringer September 28, 2011.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Strategic Planning Update
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Committee Orientation
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Updated Guided Pathways Plans and Efforts:  Preparing the CCC Guided Pathway Plan Day of Dialogue 3/15/2018.
27 February 2017 College Planning Council
Presented To: SLO Symposium
Presented To: College Planning Council
Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Los Angeles Trade Technical College Institutional Self Evaluation Report Presented to the Institutional Effectiveness and Student Success Committee.
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Presented To: College Planning Council
South Seattle Community College
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
Office of Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2014
Overview of Program Review Categories
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation follow-up report
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
In the Spirit of Student Success
Peralta Community Colleges: Environments of Effective Learning and Innovation. January 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Achieving the College Mission: Strategic Educational Master Plan Progress & Effort Presented To: College Planning Council By: Office of Institutional Effectiveness 27 June 2016

The Harbor College Mission: Los Angeles Harbor College promotes access and student success through associate and transfer degrees, certificates, economic and workforce development, and basic skills instruction. Our educational programs and support services meet the needs of diverse communities as measured by campus institutional learning outcomes.

Background SEMP articulates the college mission Achievement of the SEMP = Achievement of the college mission SEMP Revised Summer 2015 Aligned with District Strategic Plan (being renewed this year) Includes measures defined by District, State, Legislative and Federal requirements Revisions adopted July 2015 SEMP Provides Foundation for Planning and Evaluation Efforts Basis for Program Review and Unit Planning Includes measures for Institution-set Standards and Targets (ACCJC and IEPI)

Progress toward SEMP implementation Program Review 2.0/Unit Planning Pilot completed, Fall 2015 All clusters participated Unit planning process recommendations identified and approved Institution-set standards for student achievement established College-wide Unit Planning process initiated, Spring 2016 All clusters and units participating Completion requirements defined and approved Validation cycle pending Resource allocation link pending HAPS records all Assessment and Unit Planning results Student Achievement Short and Long-term Goals established (IEPI)

CPC Responsibilities Annually: SEMP Cycle (2014-17): Oversee and maintain SEMP Oversee planning processes Integrate cluster and unit priorities to develop annual priorities for the college based on achievement of the SEMP Use Annual priorities to guide resource allocation processes SEMP Cycle (2014-17): Evaluate achievement of the college mission Renew SEMP based on college progress (annual reviews, external priorities) Identify goals, objectives and measures to add or remove

Mission/SEMP Achievement Evaluation Framework Coverage Are all Goals, Objectives and Measures addressed? Is the amount of coverage appropriate? Effort/Participation Are all Operational Units of the college participating? Are Operational Units participating appropriately? Progress Are the activities to address SEMP goals being completed?

SEMP Achievement Measurement Methodology HAPS Records Unit Plans and Outcome Assessment Activities Program Review/Unit Planning process results provide the data Validation process not yet complete TO DO: Integrate program review, unit planning and resource allocation processes All results are self-reported Units create and update activities documented in HAPS Data will change over time Results are a “snapshot” in time (June 23, 2016) Numbers will change; percentages are used to “normalize” changing numbers The goal is to complete all activities by the end of the SEMP cycle (2014-17)

SEMP Coverage Results Institutional Outcome: Activity Count Activity Percent Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success 52 14% Goal 2: Teaching and Learning for Success 245 68% Goal 3: Organizational Effectiveness 16 4% Goal 4: Resources and Collaboration 26 7% Other Requirement 21 6% Grand Total 360 100%

SEMP Coverage Evaluation Is the coverage appropriate? Are there any recommendations?

College Effort/Participation Results Academic Affairs Administrative Services Student Services SEMP Goals: Count Percent  Total Total Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success 16 31%   0% 36 69% 52 100% Goal 2: Teaching and Learning for Success 193 79% 2 1% 50 20% 245 Goal 3: Organizational Effectiveness 11 3 19% 13% Goal 4: Resources and Collaboration 8% 19 73% 5 26 Other Requirement 52% 6 29% 4 21 Grand Total 233 65% 30 97 27% 360

College Effort/Participation Evaluation Is the college effort/participation appropriate? Are there any recommendations?

SEMP Progress Results 26% Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success 100% Complete < 75% Complete < 50% Complete < 25% Complete Started Not Started (blank) Grand Total Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success 10% 19% 21% 12% 6% 100% Academic Affairs 25% 0% 31% 13% Student Services 3% 28% 14% Goal 2: Teaching and Learning for Success 7% 2% 36% 29% 4% 1% 5% 11% 45% Administrative Services 50% 20% 30% 8% Goal 3: Organizational Effectiveness 38% 9% 27% 18% 33% Goal 4: Resources and Collaboration 23% 15% 16% 32% 40% Other Requirement 24% 17% 26%

SEMP Progress Evaluation Is the progress appropriate? Are there any recommendations?

CPC 2016-17 Priorities In 2015-16, the college elected to make COMPLETION (Goal 2) a priority Reviewing 2015-16 Results: Was this priority achieved? Were there any goals or objectives that did not have enough coverage? Were there any goals or objectives that did not have enough effort/participation? Were there any goals or objectives that did not have enough progress? Establishing 2016-17 Priorities Used to make resource allocation decisions What will be the priorities for 2016-17?