The TALYS nuclear model code II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
Advertisements

Modern nuclear data evaluation: straight from nuclear physics to applications Arjan Koning and Dimitri Rochman NRG Petten, the Netherlands ND-2010 April.
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Modeling of Photonuclear Reactions & Transmutation of Long-lived Nuclear Waste in High Photon Fluxes M.-L. GIACRI-MAUBORGNE, D. RIDIKAS, J.-C.
Benchmark test with OKTAVIAN data and Comment on kerma factor Yukinobu Watanabe Department of Advanced Energy Engineering Science, Kyushu University 3nd.
I. Dillmann Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe KADoNiS The Sequel to the “Bao et al.” neutron capture compilations.
Recent Developments in Geant4 Hadronics Geant4/Spenvis Workshop at JPL 6 November 2006 Dennis Wright.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Simulation of βn Emission From Fission Using Evaluated Nuclear Decay Data Ian Gauld Marco Pigni.
Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Current Status of the NJOY Nuclear Data Processing Code System and Initial ENDF/B-VII Data Testing Results Presented.
1 CN formation cross section in nucleon induced reactions on 238 U Efrem Soukhovitski, JINER Frank Dietrich, LLNL Harm Wienke, Belgonucleaire Roberto Capote,
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Covariance data: Status and Perspective at BNL D. Rochman, M. W. Herman, P. Obložinský National.
UKRNDC Activity on Nuclear Data Support to Meet the Requirements Connected with Fundamental Science and Applications Olena Gritzay, Oleksandr Kalchenko.
The Status of Nuclear Data above 20 MeV Masayoshi SUGIMOTO, Tokio FUKAHORI Japan Atomic Energy Agency IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries.
2nd International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications September 29th – October 2nd, 2009 Tuesday 29 th of September
Anti-neutrinos Spectra from Nuclear Reactors Alejandro Sonzogni National Nuclear Data Center.
V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Progress Report on Theoretical Tools and Calculations of Cross Sections.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 Compensating Effects due.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PREPRO Accomplishments Dermott “Red” Cullen Presented at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Conference.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
LLNL-PRES-?????? This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Robert Haight LANSCE-NS Workshop on Statistical Nuclear Physics and Applications in Astrophysics and Technology Ohio University July 8-11, 2008 LA-UR
Status of Nuclear Data Processing Codes at CNDC China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing.
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
Nuclear Data for Fission and Fusion Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands Post-FISA Workshop Synergy between Fission and Fusion research June ,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency On the Compensating Effects in the Evaluated Cross Sections of 235 U A. Trkov, R. Capote International Atomic Energy.
Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.
Applied Nuclear Physics Group The final meeting of IAEA CRP – 6. 2 Calculation and Evaluation of (n,  ) Cross Sections for Producing 32 P,
Current nuclear data processing status of JAEA JAEA Research Group for Reactor Physics and Standard Nuclear Code System Kenichi Tada 1.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority EAF-2010 – the best of a generation Jean-Christophe Sublet, Lee Packer Euratom/CCFE.
Marilena Avrigeanu28th Int. Workshop. on Nuclear Theory Rila Mountains 2009 α - particle Optical Potential for astrophysical studies M. Avrigeanu and V.
Activities Nuclear Data Service Yolanda Rugama OECD/NEA.
Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices FENDL-3 IAEA, Vienna, 2-5 December 2008 A Mengoni IAEA Nuclear Data Section.
1 n_TOF data-analysis workshop CERN, Geneva, February 2015 Roberto Capote, IAEA Nuclear Data Section www-nds.iaea.org NUCLEAR.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. This work was funded by the RCUK Energy Programme [grant number EP/I501045].
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.
Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Review of IEAF-2001 Cross Section Data Libraries for IFMIF Activation.
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.
Modern nuclear data evaluation: straight from nuclear physics to applications Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands April , CIAE, Beijing.
1 Cross sections of neutron reactions in S-Cl-Ar region in the s-process of nucleosynthesis C. Oprea 1, P. J. Szalanski 2, A. Ioan 1, P. M. Potlog 3 1Frank.
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
2. General overview of TALYS Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning 1,2 1 International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna 2 Division of Applied Nuclear Physics, Department.
E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)
Zirconium capture measurements:
NNDC Services B. Pritychenko National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY , USA.
UKAEA work in fission yields and decay data
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Decay Data for Fusion Applications: Status, Issues and Needs
Bayesian Monte-Carlo and Experimental Uncertainties
3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
The neutron capture cross section of the s-process branch point 63Ni
Covariance Processing at ORNL Using PUFF-IV/ERRORJ Code
The G4ParticleHP package
Covariance Processing at ORNL Using PUFF-IV/ERRORJ Code
Resonance Reactions HW 34 In the 19F(p,) reaction:
Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear Data for Reactor Fluxes
I.Hill, J.Dyrda, N.Soppera, M.Bossant
TALYS exercises I Arjan Koning Nuclear Data Section, NAPC
Nathan P. DeLauder Co-author: Lawrence W. Townsend
Presentation transcript:

The TALYS nuclear model code II Arjan Koning Nuclear Data Section, NAPC International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna ICTP-IAEA Workshop on the Evaluation of Nuclear Reaction Data for Applications, Trieste, Italy, October 2-13 2017

Contents Generating resonances and astrophysical cross sections Monte Carlo Uncertainty estimation A first glimpse of Total Monte Carlo TENDL nuclear data library Towards TALYS-2.0

TALYS-1.8 reconstructs resonances (Thanks to Red Cullen and PREPRO codes)

Maxwellian-averaged cross sections and Hauser-Feshbach

Simulated resonances

Simulated resonances

Maxwellian-Averaged Cross Sections: medium, stable nuclides

Maxwellian-Averaged Cross Sections: light nuclides

Maxwellian-Averaged Cross Sections:to the dripline

Maxwellian-Averaged Cross Sections: effect for all nuclides HFR: High Fidelity Resonances HF: Hauser-Feshbach D. Rochman, S. Goriely, A.J. Koning, H. Ferroukhi, “Radiative neutron capture: Hauser Feshbach vs. statistical resonances”, Phys. Lett. B764 (2017), 109

Initial probability distribution for TALYS parameters For all nuclides for which experimental data exists: Sample parameters from a wide uniform distribution Obtain a wide scattering of random TALYS results and the standard deviation for every reaction channel of every nuclide Compare the results with all EXFOR data: 23490 experimental data sets = 2.7 million data points Count how many EXFOR points fall inside the 1-sigma uncertainty band. Assess the width of the (prior) uniform distribution for the model parameters.

Starting point: “Expert” (Gaussian) parameter uncertainties (A. J Starting point: “Expert” (Gaussian) parameter uncertainties (A.J. Koning and D. Rochman, ``Modern nuclear data evaluation with the TALYS code system'', Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012).) Origin: Fingerspitzengefühl Multiply these uncertainties by 5 and sample ~200 parameters from uniform distribution

“Knowing nothing”: Random TALYS parameters from initial parameter pdf: uniform distribution with uncertainty multiplier = 5

Fraction of EXFOR data inside 1-sigma uncertainty band NDS-2012 Prior of this work Random TALYS Calculations for all Nuclides compared with 23490 experimental data sets = 2.7 million data points

Initial probability distribution for cross sections Perform 1 global, unadjusted TALYS calculation for the entire periodic table of elements Compare the results with all EXFOR data: 23490 experimental data sets = 2.7 million data points Determine the average deviation between TALYS and experiment. Use the results as knowledge (“pseudo-experimental data”) in a Bayesian Monte Carlo updating scheme.

Initial probability distribution for cross sections Use F-factor for each experimental data set: WPEC SG-30 on quality assessement of EXFOR

TALYS predictive power

Energy dependent predictive power

Initial probability distributions for cross sections Starting point: global TALYS central values and uncertainties based on cross sections for all nuclides

Create new parameter distributions using weights based on EXFOR Each random data set k has a weight Bauge: BFMC, Capote-Trkov: UMC-B

Create new parameter distributions using weights based on EXFOR Assign the weight w(k) of random data set k to all TALYS parameters of that run

Finally, all sampling is done from the real weighted parameter distributions

Zooming in Prior: Global TALYS – uncertainties from all EXFOR data Use weights based on EXFOR for 90Zr Final

Zooming in Prior: Global TALYS – uncertainties from all EXFOR data Use weights based on EXFOR for 90Zr Final

From nuclear data to reactors A.J. Koning and D. Rochman, ``Towards sustainable nuclear energy: Putting nuclear physics to work'', Ann. Nuc. En. 35, p. 2024-2030 (2008). 13-7-2019

Mike Herman (BNL) called this method: “Total Monte Carlo” (TMC)

TENDL philosophy Fundamental nuclear reaction data should NOT be assembled, or touched, at the level of individual isotopic evaluations of ENDF/B-VII, JEFF, JENDL, CENDL, ROSFOND or CIELO. Fundamental evaluated nuclear reaction data are: The EXFOR database with an associated table of weights per experiment An evaluated set of resonance data An input file with parameters for a nuclear model code of a precisely defined version (TALYS-1.8) If necessary: “unphysical actions” like “Fiddling” with data, fit by eye, GLS, other fitting Adoption of MT numbers from existing libraries should be stored in scripts TENDL considers ENDF-formatting as trivial and reproducible (future: same for GND) Result: fundamental data per isotope are not several Mb in MF1-MF40. The knowledge put into an isotope is represented (and actually is nothing more in practice!) by a few small files. Anything after that: ENDF-6 files, processed files, random files for Total Monte Carlo, etc. etc. is automated.

TENDL nuclear data library A.J. Koning and D. Rochman ,"Modern nuclear data evaluation with the TALYS code system“, Nuclear Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012).

TALYS Evaluated Nuclear Data Library: TENDL-2015 Neutron, proton, deuteron, triton, Helium-3, alpha and gamma data libraries. 2808 targets (all isotopes with lifetime > 1 sec.) Complete reaction description in ENDF-6 format: MF1-MF40, up to 200 MeV MCNP-libraries (“ACE-files”), PENDF files and multi-group covariance data Default: Global calculations by TALYS-1.8 and TARES (resonances), which are overruled by Adjusted TALYS calculations (340 input files) and Resonance Atlas-based TARES calculations, which are overruled by TALYS-normalization to ~200 (experimental) evaluated reaction channels from other libraries (e.g. IRDFF, light nuclides, main channels of “big 3”) For TENDL-2015, all nuclides have been evaluated by a Bayesian Monte Carlo procedure. As usual, this has resulted in complete covariance information as far as the ENDF-6 format allows: MF 31 (nubar) ,32 (resonances), 33 (cross sections), 34 (angular distributions, 35 (fission neutron spectra), 40 (isomeric information), for those who are able to process and use all that. Alternative for covariances: TENDL-2015 comes with 300 random ENDF-6 files per nuclide

Thermal capture cross sections Fleming et al, Probing experimental & systematic trends of the neutron -induced TENDL-2014 nuclear data library, UKAEA-R(15)30

Thermal (n,alpha) cross sections Fleming et al, Probing experimental & systematic trends of the neutron -induced TENDL-2014 nuclear data library, UKAEA-R(15)30

Maxw. Av. capture cross sections Fleming et al, Probing experimental & systematic trends of the neutron -induced TENDL-2014 nuclear data library, UKAEA-R(15)30

MACS comparison with other libraries Sublet and Fleming, Maxwellian-averaged neutron-induced cross sections for kT=1 keV to 100 keV, KADoNiS, TENDL-2014, ENDF/B-VII.1 and JENDL-4.0u nuclear data libraries UKAEA-R(15)29

J.C. Sublet and M. Gilbert, Decay heat validation CCFE-R(15)25, january 2015.

Decay heat should only be analyzed with General Purpose Libraries

M. Fleming, J.C. Sublet, J. Kopecky: Integro-differential validation, CCFE-R(15)27, March 2015

Towards TALYS-2.0 Full rewrite in Fortran-90/95/03/08: Work already underway. Integration of TASMAN: Statistics, optimization (parameter search), sensitivities, covariances, and Total Monte Carlo Integration of TEFAL: Complete ENDF-6 formatting from MF1 to MF40 Latest current version: TALYS-1.8 (2015): Pointwise resonance data (Atlas++ and PREPRO routines) Full integration of GEF (Schmidt and Jurado) for FY, nubar, PFNS, PFGS etc. Implementation of Avrigeanu models for alpha OMP and deuteron break-up TALYS-2.0: Now that I have done it all, I know how I should have done it, so let’s do that: even more modular all-in-one package.

Thank you! Thank you!