A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
1 4 Oct 05 Optimization of anti-DID for SiD, GLD and LDC A.Seryi October 4, 2005.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
Commissioning Status of Shintake Monitor (IP-BSM) T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamiya, S. Komamiya (Univ. of Tokyo), T. Okugi, N. Terunuma,
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
CEA DSM Irfu - F. KIRCHER - [Seoul Workshop, Feb 16-18, 2009] 1 ILD detector magnet: LoI version F. Kircher, O. Delferrière CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/SACM.
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
1 CONSIDERATIONS ON WARM MAGNET MEASURED DOSES 2012 September 3rd Francesco Cerutti for the team key contributions by TE-MSCDavide Tommasini and Pierre.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Francesco Cerutti ENERGY DEPOSITION ASPECTS FOR LHCb REQUEST 5th Joint HiLumi LHC - LARP Annual Meeting Oct 29, 2015 through L.S. Esposito’s work and essential.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Baseline BDS Design Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept. 4, 2014 Ichinoseki, MDI/CFS Meeting.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Interaction Region and Detector
Alignment and beam-based correction
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
Beam Energy & Intensity: One bunch during full cycle
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
HL-LHC Aperture Update
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
16L2 aperture measurements
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
WP3 meeting Aug 21, 2015 V1.1 RECAP Francesco Cerutti.
Status of energy deposition studies in IR3
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Optics flexibility in IR3/7
GROUP 12 CAS – Erice - March 2017 Andrea DE FRANCO
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)
Review of Quench Limits
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
Beam Screens Cooling Update (1st Oktober 2014)
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
L. Gentini, M. Giovannozzi, M. Gonzalez, M. Krupa, H. Mainaud Durand,
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA) Energy deposition in the Matching Section (v1.2): short summary on D2/Q4 A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA) WP3 Meeting – March 9, 2016

Overview Energy deposition study in the matching section (up to Q7) Optics version HL-LHCV1.2 All collimators in place Round optics Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Apertures (changes wrt optics v1.1) Significant elements Apertures (changes wrt optics v1.1) TAXN: 80mm  85mm D2 correctors: 100mm  105mm (same as D2) Q4 correctors: 100mm  90mm (same as Q4) Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Peak power density (vertical crossing) Peak power density below design values Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Peak dose (Lint=4000fb-1) (vertical crossing) Values below 20MGy… …except for the first Q4 corrector, where a peak of 30-35MGy is expected Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Peak dose (Lint=4000fb-1) (vertical crossing) Peak in Q4 H corrector (MCBYYH) is very localised The increased value is attributable to: The reduced aperture (100mm  90mm) The increase in the TAXN aperture (now 85mm) Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Summary Peak power and dose values generally well within acceptable limits Localised peak in MCBYYH ~30-35MGy Related to aperture reduction and to TAXN aperture increase Integration issues in the TAXN-D2 region: May lead to displacement of TAXN in the IP direction, with corresponding aperture adjustment Removal of TCTs (with TAXN displacement and aperture adjustment) would leave the coils in the outgoing bore exposed (especially for vertical crossing) Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Extra material Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Total power for L=7.5L0 (vertical crossing) Magnets Magnet cold mass Beam screen (b1/b2) Power [W] D2 24 1.3 / 0.1 D2 H 1.8 0.2 / 0.005 D2 V 1.6 Q4 H 10 1.4 / 0.06 Q4 V 5.4 0.6 / 0.07 Q4 7.3 0.8 / 0.1 Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Peak power density (horizontal crossing) Peak power density below design values Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Peak dose (Lint=4000fb-1) (horizontal crossing) Beam 1 Values below 20MGy… …except for the first Q4 corrector (here not evaluated), where a peak of up to ~30MGy is expected Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT

Total power for L=7.5L0 (horizontal crossing) Magnets Magnet cold mass Beam screen (b1/b2) Power [W] D2 50 2.5 / 0.1 D2 H 2.2 0.2 / 0.005 D2 V 1.4 0.2 / 0.004 Q4 H 11 1.3 / 0.03 Q4 V 4.6 0.8 / 0.03 Q4 10 1.4 / 0.1 Energy deposition in the Matching Section (D2 - Q4) | WP3 Meeting | March 9, 2016 | AT