What can we learn from 15 years of VOC measurements in France?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
Advertisements

1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Model used in « Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter in the UK » [Stedman et al., Receptor modelling of PM 10 concentrations at a UK national.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Derwent R.G. et al., 1998, “Observation and interpretation of the seasonal cycles in the surface concentration of ozone and carbon monoxide at Mace Head,
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
Formaldehyde columns over Europe as a proxy for biogenic emissions Università degli Studi dell’Aquila – CETEMPS L’Aquila, ITALY
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Insights into Beirut atmosphere: the ECOCEM project 4th CHArMEx International Workshop ICTP, Trieste October 22, 2014 * Faculty of sciences, Saint Joseph.
Diurnal and seasonal cycles of ozone precursors observed from continuous measurement at urban site in Taiwan Kuang-Ling Yang, Chien-Chung Ting, Jia-Lin.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
VOC emissions and trends in Los Angeles basin Agnès Borbon 1,2,3, Jessica B. Gilman 2,3, William C. Kuster 2, Stuart McKeen 2,3, John S. Holloway 2,3,
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
Modelling perspective: Key limitations of current country projection data in transboundary modelling activities. What improvements are needed? Jan Eiof.
Public Meeting to Discuss “Weekend Effect” Research June 23, 1999.
Hemispheric transport of ozone pollution and the nonlinearities GMI meeting UC Irvine March 17, 2008 Shiliang Wu, Harvard Bryan Duncan, NASA / GSFC Arlene.
11 September 2015 On the role of measurements and modelling in Dutch air quality policies Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
POMI kick-off meeting 7 March, 2008 Collaborative research project in support to the reduction of atmospheric pollution in REGIONE LOMBARDIA ( )
GEIA Conference – Nov. 18 th 2015 – Beijing- China Analyzing the spatial and temporal variability of the composition of anthropogenic VOC urban emissions.
Impact of VOCs from different sources on surface ozone concentration in summer in Beijing, China Hang Qu.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Date & Time 09: :30Status review and improvements  BaseCase (1) problem review and actions taken (20’)
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Evaluation of Emission Inventory.
Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by linear unmixing of aerosol mass spectra V. A. Lanz 1, M. R. Alfarra 2, U. Baltensperger.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Joint thematic session: from hemispheric to local scale air pollution; Twin Site project Task Force on Measurements and modelling A. Colette (TFMM),
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
WP3: Near-surface observations of aerosols, clouds and trace gases Task 3.1: Improvement of instrumentation, standardization and quality assessment of.
Extended Bureaux EMEP & WGE, Geneva March 21th 2017
Source Apportionment of Water Soluble Elements, EC/OC, and BrC by PMF
Karsten Baumann, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell
Lily Li, Qing Lu, Jingyu An, Cheng Huang
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Biogenic Emissions over Europe and VOC Oxidation
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrasón
French contribution to the EMEP intensive field campaigns
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
EURODELTA III RCG-Model
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
On-going developments of SinG: particles
TFMM trend analysis: use of AirBase. Preliminary results
EEMEP ASSESSMENT REPORT
CO, O3, and VOC results during 2004 Okinawa campaign
Topic 3: Meteorology and data filtering
TFMM PM Assessment Report
The EuroDelta inter-comparison, Phase I Variability of model responses
Title Why do we underestimate Elemental Carbon in PM?
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
UK (CEH) and ACTRIS WP3: In-situ chemical, physical and optical properties of aerosols WP4: Trace gases networking: Volatile organic carbon and nitrogen.
EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
S. SAUVAGE, V. RIFFAULT, A. SETYAN, V. CRENN (Mines Douai)
TFMM – Trends Emissions of air pollutants for
Time Series and Trends at GAW Global Site Hohenpeissenberg
Experience from the EMEP VOC measurements
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
TFMM Workplan & Mandate Augustin Colette & Oksana Tarasova
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
based on EMEP/MSC-W model and EMEP monitoring data
Benefits of ACTRIS for Implementation of EMEP monitoring strategy
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

What can we learn from 15 years of VOC measurements in France? Stéphane Sauvage, Antoine Waked, Nadine Locoge, Aude Pascaud, Patrice Coddeville, and all co-workers Thanks to the French Ministry of Environment and ADEME And the ACTRIS group for reactive trace gas 16th TFMM / EMEP Cracow, Poland, 5-8 May

Outline - VOC issue and monitoring strategy - Measurement method & QA/QC - Trend analysis: Background vs Urban - Source apportionment (works in progress) - Conclusion and outlook 16th TFMM / EMEP Cracow, Poland, 5-8 May

VOC issue 16th TFMM / EMEP Cracow, Poland, 5-8 May

VOC Monitoring strategy Objectives From (EMEP/CCC,1990) Current ambient concentrations Efficiency of the emission control programme Support to the transboundary oxidant modelling EMEP monitoring strategy (2010-2019) for VOCs

Compound list – EMEP main part or the GAW list (report n°172) incl. 30 ozone precursors (2008/50/EC) main part or the GAW list (report n°172)

VOC monitoring : French EMEP sites Localisation des sites de mesures FR08 Donon (1997-2007) FR15 Tardière (>2003) FR Cap Corsica (2012-2014) FR13 Peyrusse Vieille (>2001)

NMHC C2-C9 : Method Sampling: Silcosteel Canisters, 2 samples/week, Mo. & Tu. 12-16HTU Automatic sampler AVOCs (Andersen co.) Analysis: TD-GC-2FID Mines Douai Labs & Tera Envi co. (>2010) (within 3 weeks) Perfomances: DL=10-20 ppt, uncertainty: 5-15% QA/QC following EMEP recomendations +NPL standard + ACTRIS (WP4) « VOC Quality label »  + GAW audit in Dec. 2013

ACTRIS site comparison  Outstanding consistency for european sites (after ACTRIS validation) level and seasonality, and for some inter-species ratios

French EMEP sites : Trend analysis  combustion products & solvents (aromatics,..)  transport emission tracers (isoC5, Ethyne..)  gas use tracers (ethane, propane) Mann Kendall test (Annual means) Change rate (%.y-1)  significativity

NMVOC emissions (/SNAP) (France) Evident link with NMVOC emission decay Change rate (%.y-1) 1998/70/EC Car fuel regulations, benzene in gasoline 1999/13/EC VOC emission targets and rules (solvent use) - 2000/69/EC limit value for benzene & CO - National decree for gas station

background vs urban: Monthly mean profiles GC/FID/FID system on-line, hourly data Strasbourg subUrban 2002-2014 Paris Urban 2003-2014 Paris 2003-2013 Strasbourg 2002-2013 FR13 2000-2013 a Peyrusse-Vieille, FR15 2003-2013 et FR09 1997-2007

Trend analysis: background vs urban Annual means Change rate (%.y-1) similar trends for Strasbourg compare to FR08 Non significant trends for Paris (strong annual variability)

Seasonal trends Winter (DJF) Summer (JJA) Change rate (%.y-1) Seasonal Trends are detected for Paris Benzene less significant in winter (Biomass burning) The decrease of combustion products is less pronounced in winter

Source apportionment (1/2) ~Non indus. combustion Factorial analysis based on observed data (PMF) : Highlight co-variation factors of obs. species  to be assimilated to source signatures by: comparing with known source profiles (EPA/Speciate, Passent 2002, Samaleh et al 2014,..) looking at the factor contribution (temporal variations, diurnal, seasonal,..) using ancillary data (MET, other components,..) ~gasoline evaporation ~Auto exhaust ! Large dataset needed Same profiles for the both years for Paris And very similar for two different urban sites EPA/PMF 5.0 unconstrainted

Source apportionment (2/2)  spatial and temporal variation of source impacts  emission inventory and model assessment (in urban area)  source apportionment (2003-2013) and contribution trend analysis in progress  same approach with obs. in background sites DE(HPB) site (Leuchner et al 2015)  Fr sites (Sauvage et al 2009) Similar factors to be interpreted as aged profiles  idea to Harmonize source apportionment method

Conclusion/outlook VOCs = relevant source tracers Homogeneous and strong database (but from the year 2000) Significant trends related to the NMVOC emission trends Potentially comparison Bkg vs urban (twin sites) Source apportionment relevant to assess inventory and study source receptor relationships (trends) Harmonized source apportionment at an european scale  Model & measurements Collaborative work in progress (with NILU/Sverre Solberg) Nested fine-scaled EMEP/WRF model runs for French sites?  Compare biogenic VOCs  - isoprene, terpenes, carbonyls  Study link between ozone/PM/(B)VOCs  Study summer campaign episodes 16th TFMM / EMEP Cracow, Poland, 5-8 May

Thank you !