Solving Unknown Primary cancER (SUPER)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Johnson On behalf of the CR UK Stratified Medicine Programme Molecular diagnosis of cancer: Making it a reality.
Advertisements

Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem
Canadian Health Outcomes for Better Information and Care
Cancer of Unknown Primary Dr Chris Jones Consultant Medical Oncologist North of England Cancer Network Annual Conference 20 September 2013.
Patients’ supportive care needs beyond the end of treatment: A prospective, longitudinal study.
Needs assessment of cancer survivors O Santin, L Murray, A Gavin and M Donnelly Cancer health services research and survivorship studies programme Centre.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2012.
Interferences between depression and life quality on patients suffering of type 2 diabetes First Author : Madalina Crisan Coauthors: Madalina Salagean.
1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,
Center for Injury Research and Policy Perceived Need and Unmet Need for Support Services Following Severe Lower Extremity Trauma.
Background: In response to the supportive care needs of cancer patients Northern Health initiated a two day a week psychology clinic for cancer patients.
Barb Supanich, RSM, MD, FAAHPM Holy Cross IP Palliative Care Team November 11, 2010.
Do Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Predict Dementia at 1- and 2- Year Follow-Up? Findings from the Development of Screening Guidelines and Diagnostic.
Risk assessment for VTE Dr Roopen Arya King’s College Hospital.
Item Response Theory (IRT) Models for Questionnaire Evaluation: Response to Reeve Ron D. Hays October 22, 2009, ~3:45-4:05pm
1 Adherence Measures and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in the China Adherence for Life (AFL) Cohort March 18, 2008 Lora Sabin Center for International.
Quality of life and its health- relations. Definitions.
Impact of using a next button in a web-based health survey on time to complete and reliability of measurement Ron D. Hays (Rita Bode, Nan Rothrock, William.
CoRPS Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases Multiple myeloma survivors experience a low quality of life and many disease-specific complaints:
Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in the primary health clinic attendees in Kuwait Dr. Sulaiman Alkhadhari, Dr. Aseel Omran Alsabbrri, Dr.Ibrahim H.A.Mohammad,
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Parity and Post-traumatic Stress: A Preliminary Study Benjamin Reissman 1, Sharmilla Amirthalingam 1, Gabriella Deanne 1, Jackie Finik 1,2, Yoko Nomura,
Deep Dyadic Friendships vs. Broad Peer Preference During Adolescence as Predictors of Adolescent and Adult Internalizing Symptoms Rachel K. Narr & Joseph.
Study Design: Making research pretty Adam P. Sima, PhD July 13, 2016
Some epidemiological principles and methods
Provider-Caregiver Interactions: Evaluation and Use of the Therapeutic Relationship Index for Caregiver Interventions Yeon Kyung Chee, Marie P. Dennis,
The Association of Exposure to Adverse
NIH: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Ron D. Hays Functional Vision and Visual Function November 10, 2016, 8:55-9:15am.
LATEST RESEARCH JUNE 2015 Formed in 2009 the Aston Research Centre for
Screening for Psychological Distress
Teleneuropsychology:   Are Patient And Family Satisfaction And Understanding Of Cognitive Test Results Similar Across In-Person And Videoconferencing Modalities?
Results from a survey of UK patients at risk of bowel cancer, their experiences and information preferences. Selina Goodman, Heather Skirton, Ray Jones.
PROMIS-29 V2.0 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores Ron D. Hays
Improved diagnosis, therapy and outcomes for patients with CUP
Father play in multiple contexts: Study Site Information
Parenting behaviors predict effortful control and internalizing/externalizing problems among children during the first year of a cancer diagnosis Emily.
Dr Gareth James ASPC lead on Audit
Impact of Functioning on the Career Development of Young Adult CNS Survivors David R. Strauser, Ph.D.
Key research: Van Leeuwen et al
By Dr Shewikar Farrag Dr Nehad Sabry
84 Breast Cancer patients
Chapter One Data Collection
Results: Patient details Results: QoL
Improving the performance reporting of primary care patient experience
Monday, 17 September 2018 Should capacity assessment be performed routinely prior to discussing advance care planning with older people? Oleg Kiriaev,
National Academies of Science, Engineering & Medicine
The Centre for Community-Driven Research
Travis Wright, Ed.D April 26, 2018
To use or not to use? An exploration of cannabis use motives and constraints Dr Liz Temple
S1316 analysis details Garnet Anderson Katie Arnold
Identifying differences in the experiences of care between patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer of known and unknown primaries Dr Richard Wagland.
Dr. Muhammad Ajmal Zahid Chairman, Department of Psychiatry,
Rhematoid Rthritis Respiratory disorders
Teen Health Perspective Results
Mental Health First Aid Training for Advisory Agents Working with Farmers A/Prof Don Gorman Dr Delwar Hossain Dr Rob Eley Dr Jeff Coutts.
Introduction Results Methods Conclusions
Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 167 No. 12 • 19 December 2017
A Clinical Trial on the effects of Physical Activity and Nutrition on Southern Asian Post Breast Cancer Patients Authors: Kirtan Amin and Dr. Bhibha M.
ASSESSMENT IN COUNSELLING PREPAIRED BY: DR.MUNA ABDEEN ABDELRAHMAN.
Big Mental Health Survey: Senedd Briefing
Decreasing Compassion Fatigue In Cardiovascular Intensive Care Nurses Through Self-Care and Mindfulness Staci Abernathy, MSN, CPNP-AC, DNP Student, Rebecca.
Professor Deborah Baker
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Primary Mental Health Care Service on Outcomes for Common Mental Disorders: Modelling the Effect of Deprivation Jonathan.
Dr Gareth James ASPC lead on Audit
Amani Abdullah Bahdailah
International Perthes Study Group
GIM & HSR Research Seminar: October 5, 2018
Patient-reported Outcome Measures
Mental Health Navigator
Public Health Implications
Presentation transcript:

Solving Unknown Primary cancER (SUPER) Established in 2014 National prospective cohort study 11 metropolitan and rural sites across Australia

Overall Project Aims To establish a cohort of CUP patients with associated biospecimens, clinical, quality of life and psychosocial data To determine the clinical management patterns when genomics test results provided to treating clinician To establish the experiences, quality of life, psychosocial needs of patients with CUP compared to a matched sample of patients with metastatic cancer of a known primary and investigate differences between rural vs urban CUP patients

1st patient recruited November 2013 SUPER – 31st March 2019 1st patient recruited November 2013 Site Total Peter Mac 131 Westmead 26 Nepean 15 Blacktown Flinders 14 Geelong 29 Warrnambool 11 Cabrini 6 Bendigo 22 Darwin Healthscope 5 Border MO TOTAL RECRUITMENT 294 Recruiting ~6 per month 294 participants in total Study target – 350 Total Recruitment

AIM 1 SUPER – Establishing a CUP cohort (1st April) 2019) Item Number Target = 350 294 (84%) 56 remaining Recruitment rate 6 per month on average Projection: 30th Nov 2019 Item Number Female (%) Age (SD) Rural (%) Deceased < 3 M (%) < 6 M < 9 M < 12 M Phase 1 [2013-15] 168 92 (55) 63 (13) 28 (17) 30 (18) 50 (30) 67 (40) 81 (48) Phase 2 [2017 – ] 128 68 (53) 65 (13) 51 (40) 11* (10) 18* (23) 20* (32) 23* (46) Combined 294 159 (54) 79 (27) 44* (15) 68* (28) 87* (38) 104* (48) Test Item Number Phase 2 data 128 samples   CCP Complete 81 (63%) Incomplete 41 (32%) Pending 6 (5%) SUPERDx 77 (60%) 44 (34%) 7 (6%) Combined Complete both 72 (56%) Incomplete both 36 (28%) Complete either 86 (67%) * Number of included participants vary in P2 data as their duration on study will vary according to when they where recruited

AIM 2 SUPER – Impacting clinical decisions Specific Aims: Describe the molecular landscape of CUP patients and correlate molecular test results with demographic and clinical characteristics Determine the impact site-of-origin and mutation profiling has had on treatment decisions taken by the treating clinician 13

Clinical impact of molecular testing Dr Tharani Sivakumaran Design: Pre/post survey of clinical management prior to and post receiving genomic results Analysis ongoing

Early Results: Phase I Likely site of origin: CUPguide CUPGuide was completed for ~78% (97 of 124) of samples Primary site prediction was made in ~87% (84 of 97) Predictions resulted in: a change in management in ~12% (10 of 84) confirmed current management in ~63% (53 of 84) Mutation profiling: CCP version 1 Comprehensive Cancer Panel (CCP) was completed in ~83% (103 of 124) Actionable gene mutations where identified in ~10% (10 of 103) Germline gene mutations were identified in 6% (6 of 103) a change in treatment for 30% (3 of 10) of patients because the targeted therapy was available.

AIM 3 SUPER – Quality of life and psychosocial needs Specifically, we seek: To establish reliable estimates for quality of life and psychosocial needs across the CUP illness trajectory To identify similarities and differences between CUP and non-CUP patients from baseline to 12-month follow-up To identify similarities and differences between urban and rural/regional CUP patients from baseline to 12-month follow-up

What do we know about the experience of CUP? Compared to known primaries, CUP patients were: less likely to receive written information about their type of cancer, diagnostic tests and any operations they had Less likely to understand the results of their tests Less likely to completely understand the explanation of their illness Less likely to feel their views were taken into account in treatment discussions

Communicating with CUP patients 86 oncologist responded. 99% prepared to make a diagnosis of CUP if no primary located BUT 27% prefer to provide a ‘best guess’ rather than CUP as an diagnostic entity 83% would assign a primary site to obtain PBS drug funding 62% did not have a specific treatment protocol for CUP Different ways of describing Dx: “No I don’t use CUP, I usually talk about my best guess primary” vs “The primary (parent) appears of have regressed but metastases(children) have grown”

METHODS Design A prospective, longitudinal study with matched control group at baseline CUP patients recruited from both urban and rural/regional Patient reported outcome data will be collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-baseline (or to death).

Measures Physical, social and mental health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Interactive System (PROMIS®) : Anxiety; Depression; Fatigue; Pain Interference; Pain Intensity; Sleep Disturbance; Physical Function; Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities Cancer-specific health-related quality of life EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire – C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Medical communication/information and psychological needs: Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients (NA-ALCP) Hopelessness : Hopelessness Assessment in Illness (HAI) Communication about and understanding of illness and treatment: a purpose-built questionnaire drawn from UK National Cancer Patient Experience Survey

Psychological distress in CUP patients: the role of communication Aim To investigate the impact of patient-oncologist communication practices and socio-demographic factors on the anxiety and depression of CUP patients Design Cross-sectional survey: data drawn from baseline data from SUPER study. Dr Kamil Wolyniec

Patients’ communication experiences Item Response scale Percentage How well do you feel you understand your cancer? Very well Well Not so well Not well at all 20% 43% 25% 12% Were you given written information about the type of cancer you had? Yes, and it was easy to understand Yes, but it was difficult to understand No, I was not given written information I did not need written information Don’t know/can’t remember 26% 9% 57% 7% 0% How do you feel about the way you were told you had advanced cancer? It was done sensitively It should have been done a bit more sensitively It should have been done a lot more sensitively 78% 16%

Results CUP patients who felt they understood their cancer very well reported lower levels of anxiety and depression than those who did not. Patient’s understanding of cancer Patient’s understanding of cancer p=.006 p=.029 p=.004 p=.040 p=.006 Mean Anxiety scores Mean Depression scores Very well well Very well well Not so well Not well at all Not so well Not well at all

Key findings Only 20% felt they understood their cancer very well and this was linked to lower levels of anxiety and depression Less than half received written information about cancer or information about support but not linked to psychological distress. Younger CUP patients reported higher anxiety and depression 28

Conclusions Locating and retaining CUP patients in a cohort study remains challenging; as is successful genomic testing Rapid advances in genomic testing to assist in the diagnosis and treatment but at present these advances don’t appear to be translating into clinical management change Genomic testing advances represent a challenge for both clinician communication and patient understanding Good patient understanding may alleviate psychological distress Younger patients may require additional support and referral to psychological services