Cryomodule Test Schedule

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

RF Safety Discussion Derun Li/Bob Rimmer Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SRF Institute, JLab.
Automation of the 805MHz cavity conditioning procedure Ajit Kurup MuCool Test Area RF Workshop, Fermilab 22 nd August 2007.
RF Unit Test Facility at NML & CM1 Test Plan Bob Kephart Fermilab IWLC-10 October 20, 2010.
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation Sensors, Actuators, Heaters, and Wiring ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 9/5/2012 Peter Quigley Internal Design Review.
SRF_BizPlan_31Oct2010_Rev_14 Production Preparations at JLAB JLab SRF Team EDMS – PLM DESY TeamCenter Meeting at SLAC 31 MAR 2014.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 (ECFA-CLIC-ILC Joint Meeting) Denis Kostin, MHF-SL,
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
TDR Part 2: 3.3 Cavity Integration (10 pages) H. Hayano Baseline Design based on the meeting discussion.
RF power & FPC status Eric Montesinos, CERN BE-RF on behalf of all people involved, great thanks to all of them !
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan H. Hayano. Assembly work after cavity arrived Assumption: cavity with VT, with pickup antena, with Ar or N2 filled,
Cavity status; recent KEK activities : Hayano (1) STF CM-1 cavities are; MHI-014: 3-rd VT:36MV/m (finished) MHI-015: 3-rd VT: > 18.4MV/m.
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 10/10/2015 Peter Quigley, MLC Design Review.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
XFEL SRF Accelerating Module Prototypes Tests at DESY Fermilab Seminar, July 21st Denis Kostin, MHF-SL, DESY.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 High-Gradient Module Test Lutz Lilje.
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan; H. Hayano ILC10 GDE meeting.
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Oct. 26 ILC KEK Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Preparation for S1-Global Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
Reliability of SNS Superconducting Linac April 12, 2011 Jeff Saunders SNS/ORNL.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics.
Gradient Degradation Experience at Fermilab (NML/CM-1) Elvin Harms TTC Meeting, Beijing 5-8 December 2011.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
1 new module Seven cell Cavity, 0.7 m long (high Q L ) 8 Cavities per Cryomodule Fits the existing Cryomodule footprint.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY TESLA Technology Collaboration (TTC) Meeting, February 28 - March , Milano, Italy Denis Kostin,
EXAMPLE OF REDUCED CRYOMODULE HEAT CAPACITY DUE TO HELIUM PRESSURE RETURN LEVELS 0L04 CASE HISTORY.
Evolution of Field Emission Characteristics Selected C100 Cryomodules Michael Drury.
RF System for C100 Cryomodule C100 GDR mode – Original/Modified Tuner Phase noise 25.6 deg rms /14 Hz rms Phase noise 7.5 deg rms /4 Hz rms.
SRF Operating Experience at JLab
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
RF Systems and Controls for the LERF CM Tests
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan
Preliminary Review of LERF as Cryomodule Testing Facility for LCLS-II
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
LCLS-II Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
RF interlocks for higher intensities (LMC 15 June)
Update on HW commissioning
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
S1-G Webex meeting Global Design Effort
SNS Operational History
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
XFEL cavities and cryomodules measurements at AMTF
Experience with High Loaded Q cavity Operation at JLAB
Jefferson Lab Low Level RF Controls
C100 Operational Performance
CW Operation of XFEL Modules
Gradient Team Plans Bob Legg 29 June 2016.
CW accelerating module test progress at DESY
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
C75 Commissioning Michael Drury SRF Operations Support
First High Power Test of the ESS Double Spoke Cavity package
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
An Optimal Procedure for RF Conditionning at the FREIA Laboratory
SPOKE Cavities frequency preparation plan and RF control procedures
Cavity Degradation Experience at S1-Global
The spoke CM tests at FREIA
C100 Operation Enhancing gradient reach for the
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
Presentation transcript:

Cryomodule Test Schedule M. Drury 11-Nov-2018

Outline Schedule Staffing Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule The schedule presented addresses the first test of two cryomodules in the LERF Expect this round of testing to be the worst case in terms of schedule time Debugging new systems General lack of familiarity with new controls Developing new testing procedures. We can expect to shave Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule: Cool Down Cool Down depends on CHL schedule Need CHL to 4K before u-tube operations Pump down of the LERF modules coincides with CHL pump down of the linacs to 2K Start simultaneous Cool downs on 1/3/19 (2nd day back after break) The modules must be at 4K, stable and full of liquid before 01/14 If all goes well, the modules are ready for pump down by 01/09 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule: Pre-checks and prep work HPRF pre-checks (SSA’s already checked out into shorts etc) Complete RF Cable calibrations All GM tubes are in correct locations Check all waveguide flange connections at couplers and at SSA outputs. Check all coax cable connections Field probes Directional couplers Arc detectors in place ~ Two shifts to complete 01/15 – 01/16 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule: Pre-checks and prep work Interlock Checks –both cryomodules - 1 shift PSS to Power Permit SSA’s - High Voltage On and RF On Cavities to RF On Check each interlock to ensure that RF permit is removed Beamline Vacuum – all eight permits Coupler Vacuum – all eight permits Arc detectors Fire test LED’s – each cavity Coupler temps Force trip by lowering trip level below temperature reading for each of two sensors on each coupler. At end of test, ensure trip levels are correctly set Stepper Temps Force trip by lowering trip level below temperature reading for each sensor on each tuner. At end of test, ensure trip levels are correctly set. ~ Two shifts – complete 01/17 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule: Tuners Tuner Tests (both cryomodules) Set up cavity at low gradient. (No higher than 5 MV/m) Exercise each mechanical tuner Verify acceptance criteria for mechanical tuners Each cavity left at 1300.000 MHz Exercise piezo tuners Verify acceptance criteria for piezo tuning (range) Two piezos per cavity ~ 1 hour per cavity – two shifts of tuning Budget 3 shifts in case there are issues Coupler (FPC) tuning Manual tuning – low power rf with network analyzer locally (in vault) Tune all couplers to 4x107 ~ 2 days Complete by 01/23 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule : Maximum Gradient Measure Qext’s (FPC, field probe, HOM’s) (at initial gradient ~ 8 MV/m) Probe calibration Monitor predetermined signal list using strip tools Ramp up gradient in SEL Pulsed mode (low duty cycle < 10%) Automated ramp routine? (if not then gradients raised manually at set increments and intervals) Ramp from 8 MV/m until gradient limit is reached Limits include repeatable quenches, admin limits, repeatable trips from interlocks monitor for field emission Repeat ramp from (limiting gradient – 3 MV/m) up to limiting gradient in SEL CW mode. Verify CW limiting gradient One hour run at Usable Gradient Usable Gradient = (quench gradient – ½ MV/m) or admin limit or field emission limited gradient. At end of one hour, automated ramp down to collect FE data, frequency vs. gradient If one hour run fails, lower gradient by ~1/2 MV/m and try again. Re-measure Qext’s at Usable Gradient and at 16 MV/m Budget ~ 8 hours per cavity for untested module, ~ 4 hours per cavity for tested module Complete by 01/31 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule : Fast Cool Down and Qo Measurements Temp Bump / Fast Cool Down Budget ~5 days to complete both cryomodules Must be scheduled with input and approval of the Cryo Group and may effect thee schedule. Qo’s Mass flow method Needs procedural development ~ 1 week to develop Allot ~2 hours per data point at first (after development) Time required may decrease with experience ~ 8 hours per cavity to start (after development cycle) Back up plan – dP/dt method Complete by 02/26 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule: Multiple Cavity Operations In general, set gradients in all cavities in a cryomodule at 16 MV/m or at the “Usable Gradient” if lower than 16 MV/m. GDR mode operation Ramp each cavity up to target gradient Cryo Operator monitors pressure, level in primary Monitors 5K ckt – adjusts flow as necessary Adjusts heater power down in LERF modules to compensate for increased dynamic load. With all cavities at target gradients - soak until coupler temps reach equilibrium temperature ~ 6 – 10 hours Perform procedure on each cryomodule in turn Perform procedure with both cryomodules Budget ~ 3 shifts per operation Multiple cavity operations must be scheduled with input and approval from the Cryo Group which may affect the schedule. Complete by 03/05 After completion of these tests – modules can be warmed up with Cryo Group approval Earliest date – 03/06 Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Schedule assumes two shifts a day, M-F This schedule does not account for potential remote operations outside the Test Plan. Might not fully account for “debugging” While the schedule is somewhat conservative, will likely run longer. If testing runs past the end of Winter Physics Run (03/12) could be halted by CHL work. Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Overall Schedule Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Staffing Test Operators are initially selected from a list of personnel that have experience testing cryomodules in both the CMTF and in the CEBAF accelerator. Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

List of Potential Test Operators Staffing List of Potential Test Operators RF Test Anna Solopova – Lead RF Test Operator Janice Nelson - SLAC Bob Legg Mike Drury Mike McCaughan Gigi Ciovati Steve Dutton Cryo Test Naeem Huque – Lead Frank Humphry Leonard Page Peter Owen Mike Drury Liang Zhao Expect that SLAC will contribute Visiting Operators Expect some help from Ops during Down time Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018

Test Plan is well defined at the top level Summary Test Plan is well defined at the top level Some development work is required to deal with new measurement schemes and new hardware As currently scheduled, testing is compatible with CEBAF Operations Any operations that may have an effect on CHL stability will be scheduled with input and approval of the Cryo Group. Transition to Operations Review 12 Nov 2018