Analytic Optimization Thalamus Hill SVP of Advanced Analytics, RKD Group Robert Connelly Director of Strategic Services, Integral #DM201.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METRICS THAT MATTER MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF YOUR FUNDRAISING EFFORTS IN A MULTI- CHANNEL ENVIRONMENT.
Advertisements

Multichannel Personalization At Scale: Building Incremental Value With #dunnhumby.
Go Mobile or Fall Behind. Gary Richmond – VP, Sales & Account Management.
1 "Am I Meeting My Goals?" A Study in Accountability - Conversion as a Process Southeast Tourism Society Thanks for joining us today. Your phone is automatically.
1 Converting List Members into Donors Target User Forum—Boston, April 2008 Defenders of Wildlife & Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund.
Mary Lou Roberts PLANNING A SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING CAMPAIGN September 2011.
Direct Marketing 201 Analytics: Statistics for Fundraisers May 15, 2013.
THE 6 MARKETING METRICS YOUR BOSS ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT. Prove the ROI of your marketing efforts by presenting these six metrics. CHEAT SHEET.
Wood for trees 1wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 1 Testing Jon Kelly, Director of Wood for Trees March 2015 Outstanding M arketing S ervices.
Standard Package Package Minutes : 500 Minutes Just 10 Cents / Additional Minutes - Was 15 cents Call Tracking Numbers : 10 Tracking Numbers Was 5 Tracking.
NARFE Membership Marketing 32 nd NARFE National Convention August 2012.
January 29, 2015 Maximizing the Middle Break through with best practices in middle donor development Derek Torry, Vice President Robbin Gehrke, SVP, Creative.
Is your Organization “High Performing?” Direct Response Solutions, Inc.
On Target Group Coaching
IoF Insight in Fundraising 2010 Conference Classic Analysis: Supporter Attrition Lifetime Value RFV Victoria Barham – Senior Marketing Analyst, PDSA David.
Using ROI to Make Your Case Tom Willoughby Vice Chancellor for Enrollment, University of Denver Greg Eichhorn Vice President for Enrollment Management.
Catalog Matchbacks and Advertising Attribution How to Best Invest Advertising Dollars in a Confusing Environment Kevin Hillstrom President, MineThatData.
…and how to give it to them What CEOs Want Patti Phillips, Ph.D.
MSE608C – Engineering and Financial Cost Analysis Managerial Accounting.
Marketing Strategies & Engagement Building Awareness & Engagement to Support our Mission Marketing Strategies & Engagement.
Direct Marketing 201 Acquisition Katie Valvo Associate Director, Acquisition The Nature Conservancy
KPI’s for Fundraising …Measurements for Success
Turning Customer Behavior into Business Behaviors that Drive ROI.
Multichannel Mixer #IMABmixer Katy Dubina, CDR Fundraising Group Mike Johnston, hjc Chris McKinley, Grizzard.
Kautilya Ecommerce Efficiency Measurer
Annual Fund Segmentation and Reporting Cam Stoufer, Senior Director, Annual and Special Gifts Andrea Elliott, Director of Development Communications and.
Big Data – Big ROI Cathy Finney Deputy Vice President, Strategic Services The Wilderness Society Chuck Pruitt Co-managing Director, AB Data Kevin Moran.
FINDING THE EFFICIENT FRONTIER OF DIGITAL MARKETING NAVIS LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE 2016.
“Creating an Annual Fund Program that Works” by Patrick B. Mulvey, CFRE Vice President for Development The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
BUILDING "SURROUND SOUND" FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGNS THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2015 #15NTC | #15NTCSURROUND.
Traci Prantner Client Services Team Manager Innovairre Communications x255 Mary Hackett Founder & President Delve.
Introduction to Digital Analytics Keith MacDonald Guest Presentation.
Designing a Planned Giving Program
Membership Mid-Atlantic Chapter Conference Why Membership? Unrestricted Revenue PipelineInfluence.
Diversified Revenue + Funding Strategies presented by
Contemporary Selling 2016 Final Exam Dr. Carlos Valdez
The 6 Marketing Metrics Investors Care About
Financial Strategy CHAPTER 06 McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Social Network Platform
Integrated Marketing Communication
Donor Acquisition Innovations that Produce Measurable Results
Building the Fundraising Infrastructure
2016 Columbus Survey Results
How Coremetrics is Priced
Using Models for Reactivation
9 Customer relationship management
Marketing Quarterly/Yearly Business Review
Nicole Steen-Dutton, ClickDimensions
The secret value of existing customers
Matthew Rullo, Human Rights Watch Joe Mclaughlin, Beaconfire RED
9/14/ :46 AM BRK3293 How the Portland Trail Blazers Use Personalization and Acxiom Data to Target Customers Chris Hoder Program Manager, AI + Research.
Building Your Development Strategy
Enhancing Your Student Recruitment with Google Analytics
MULTI-CHANNEL FUNDRAISING INTEGRATION STRATEGIES
Databases & Analytics Julie Wilson.
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Treasurer’s Report to Council - Membership Information Session -
Larry.
Vice President of Business Development
IT’S ALL ABOUT MISSION Development initiatives flow from mission of the apostolate and vision set forth by the leadership team. Spirit Catholic Radio.
FY 2016: Number of active accounts as of
Developing an Integrated Advancement Plan
Goal Identification Identify what the you raise will support. Flight
User Guide ©CEFRIO 2018 – PROGRAMME EDNET 1
Successful Budget Strategies
Building Welcome / Welcome Back Strategies
What the heck is a data strategy and why do you need one, now.
Analytic Optimization Thalamus Hill SVP, Advanced Analytics RKD Group
Digital Marketing and Gift Giving
Sr. Vice Commanders/Quartermaster Conference
Presentation transcript:

Analytic Optimization Thalamus Hill SVP of Advanced Analytics, RKD Group Robert Connelly Director of Strategic Services, Integral #DM201

Analytics Drives Strategy

LTN

Net Impact by Giving Level 62% of the donors acquired are under $25 and do not generate net revenue. 1st Gift Levels LTN Value % New Donors Break-Even Point <$25 ($22.14) 62.4% Not in 5 Years $25-$99 $32.08 36.1% 9 Months $100+ $324.39 1.5% Immediately $11.53 100% Should be 3~5% Note: national organizations should generate between $20-$25 of long-term net value

Low Control Gift Array People give to what they’re being asked for; therefore, be careful …. None of the ask array values are at or above the net generating threshold of $25. LTN Viability

Geographic Footprint In other words, follow the money Socio-economic status and becoming a viable donor (net producer) is correlated. Wealth Level Market Penetration

LTN by Wealth Cluster Optimized organizations acquire 40% of their donors from Wealth Cluster 1. Reduce acquisition within WC’s 7-10 as it loses $3.06 of LTN value per donor acquired. Wealth Clusters High = 1 Medium = 2-4 Low = 5-10

LTNROI

Prior to LTN evaluation LTN Value by Mail Volume 18.3 million rental names were evaluated within 181 lists – LTN to ROI viability = 0.48. Uncovering the linear relationship between LTN and ROI has led to a 125% increase in net. Prior to LTN evaluation

LTN by Age Donors acquired between ages 55-74 generate positive levels of LTN value.

LTN by Control Package Donors acquired via non-premium packages are 353% better in generating net value.

LTN by Seasonality For this national organization, Long-Term Net value was $12.80. Target more donors in February, April and August – 35%, 66% and 48% higher in LTN value.

LTN by Multichannel Readiness Multichannel ready donors are significantly more valuable than those who are not. Given the intrinsic value, implement strategies to materialize this financial potential.

Multivariate Testing

Donor Journey Use attribution logic to understand the “true” conversion pathway relative to last click insights Originated via Paid Search Visited Leadership Team Page via Paid Search Came back via Paid Search Visited a donation form but did not convert Exposed to Display ads Received a Direct Mail package Exposed to Paid Social Came back to the site (direct) Visited What We Do page Came back and donated $2.5K (credited to direct) Uncover what initiates, supports and converts in order to properly create your media mix budget

Enterprise Segmentation People give to their passion points Familiarity and trust = donor value Connecting to the different faces of an organization = loyalty Demographics Attitudes Concerns Behavior Belief Familiarity Giving Heart Engagement

$7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Ask yourself, how should we be handling our data? GiGo – Garbage In / Garbage Out Ask yourself, how should we be handling our data? Collect what you only need to. Question how the data will be used. Discuss how will you get the data in…and just as important, how will you get it out? Am I being consistent with how data is being collected & stored? Is anything missing that will render the data less useful (or useless)? $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Baseline Calculations Cash revenue in a set period of time Gross Revenue Reviewed by segment, campaign, program, and fiscal year Gross revenue minus expense Net Revenue Expenses typically include direct costs for campaigns (less typical: overhead costs like database fees, caging, etc.) Number of gifts divided by quantity mailed Response Rate 1,500 gifts divided by 50,000 quantity mailed = 3% response rate Top indicator of campaign engagement level Gross revenue divided by number of gifts Average Gift $52,500 in gross revenue divided by 1,500 gifts = $35 average gift Top indicator of campaign commitment $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Gross Revenue per Thousand Mailed Net Revenue per Thousand Mailed Calculations Con’t Gross revenue divided by quantity mailed multiplied by 1,000. Gross Revenue per Thousand Mailed $52,500 revenue divided by 50,000 quantity mailed * 1,000 = $1,050 rev/m Allows equalized revenue comparison with differing quantities. Useful for overall productivity of appeals. Net revenue (gross revenue-overall expense) divided by quantity mailed multiplied by 1,000. Net Revenue per Thousand Mailed $52,500 revenue minus $15,000 expense = $37,500 net revenue. Divided by 50,000 quantity mailed * 1,000 = $750 net rev/m Net revenue divided by donors (number of gifts) Net Revenue Per Donor $20,000 gross revenue - $40,000 cost = -$20,000 net revenue divided by 1000 donors = -$20 net revenue per donor. Most useful as a measurement of acquisition productivity (often a net loss) $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Measuring Retention Defining retention Percentage of donors that return to give another gift in a specific timeframe (typically 0-12 months) Defining retention Measure the retention of new joins separately from multi-year members Lifecycle has a significant impact Considers both retained new joins and multi-year members, and influenced by the ratio of each Overall retention $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Retention by Giving First-Year Retention Multi-Year Retention FY members from current year/new joins from previous year Critical to understand behavior of new join cohort Multi-Year Retention MY members in current year/MY, FY, and reinstate in prior year Break into consecutive years for more insight Overall Retention MY, FY, reinstate in current year/MY, FY, reinstate, and new in prior year Influenced by quantity – ie overall retention could decline with large influxes of new joins $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Visualizing Retention $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Identifying Donor Groups $7.6M New: Donors who made their first ever gift within the 12 months being reviewed Lapsed (Reinstated This Year): Donors who did not make a gift in the prior 12 months Reinstated Last Year: Donors who were previously 12m+ Lapsed and reactivated in the prior 12 months Consecutive Givers: Donors who have given in 2 or more consecutive 12 month periods, and are 3+ years on the file New Last Year: Donors who were New in the prior 12 months and are in their 2nd year on file $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Activation by Donor Group Detail *OTG Donors Only $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Donor Pipeline to Consecutive Donors $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

SUSTAINERS $7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

New Monthly Donor Activation

How Activation Impacts Value

Existing Donor Average Gift Impacts Growth

How Performance Drives Investment

$7.6M $6.6M $8.6M $6.9M $24.2M $23.8M $21.7M $19.4M $15.7M

Thank You! #DM201 Thalamus Hill SVP of Advanced Analytics, RKD Group Robert Connelly Director of Strategic Services, Integral #DM201