María del Carmen Miquel Lasso de la Vega

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Policy Delegated Acts. Regional Policy 2 Delegated ActsImplementing Acts 32(10): Purchase of land and combination of TA with FI 33(3)(a):FI complying.
Advertisements

Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against corruption and organized crime in Montenegro Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against.
Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Presentation of the Work Programme for the year 2008 Dušan Petrović, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice December.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
ATU Corporate Services (Anguilla) Inc. P.O. Box 1551, The Valley, Anguilla, B.W.I. Phone Fax
1 Supplement to the Guideline on Prevention of Money Laundering Hong Kong Monetary Authority 8 June 2004.
3rd session: Corporate Governance
THE CFATF MUTUAL EVALUATION PROCESS (IN A (SMALL) NUTSHELL) Robin Sykes Financial Investigations Division.
1 Jersey Funds Association Educational training session – 22 June 2010.
Source: Section 2 General Code of Conduct A n t i m o n e y l a u n d e r i n g ( A M L ) i s a t e r m m a i n l y u s e d i n t h e f i n a n c i a.
TAXATION OF TRUSTS DAY 6 SESSION III & IV slide 6.4.
International International Standards on Regulating DNFBPs & The way forward Mr Ping-Yiu MA Assistant Secretary for Security 4 March 2010 Narcotics Division,
Chapter 7 Corporate Governance.
States and Government Companies Murilo Barella Brasília – 12 Março 2013.
Eimer O’Rourke Head of Retail Banking Anti-Money Laundering 3 rd time lucky ICAI – 18 October 2007.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
MEXICO´s INCENTIVES FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT October 20, 2007 Course Number MUNOZ MANZO y BELAUNZARAN, S. C. SPEAKER ALEJO MUNOZ.
Heba Shams (World Bank) & Nadim Kyriakos –Saad (IMF) World Bank
Capital Markets Board of Turkey. Capital Markets Board of Turkey WHAT ARE THE POLICY TRADE-OFFS FOR IMPROVING DISCLOSURE.
Principles of good practice Jana Kunická Community Philanthropy Initiative Coordinator European Foundation Centre.
International International Standards on Regulating DNFBPs & The way forward Mr Peter KWOK Assistant Secretary for Security 19 February 2009 Narcotics.
Grosu-Axenti Diana Financial Inspection Director Financial Inspection vs External & Internal audit in Republic of Moldova.
Good practices from and for the EU accountability process Irena Petruškevičienė Vilnius, 17 October 2006.
Professional Values and Basic Business Legislation.
Tax Information Exchange Agreements Formal Ratification 2011.
Annual seminar in Berlin – 27 th May Should EU corporate governance measures take into account the size of listed companies ? How ? Should a.
World Bank International Standards and their Measures for Financial Institutions and Non-Financial Businesses and Professions to Prevent Money Laundering.
1 World Bank Workshop - 14 March 2006 The disclosure of financial information according to the Transparency Directive by Mina Filippa Legal Advisor/ Rapporteur.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
Chapter 7 Corporate Governance. Definition of Corporate governance “Corporate governance involves a set of relationships between a company’s management,
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
Unit A.2 – Strategic Programming, Reports, Consultative Commitee, External Relations P 1 21 March 2005 Istanbul – 21 March 2005 Luc Schaerlaekens Unit.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.
MONEY LAUNDERING “The Basics”.
Beneficial Ownership and Source of Wealth
Chapter 3 MANAGEMENT.
AML/CFT Compliance in the eu
Contents Global transparency initiatives Actions of the European Union
EU Sanctions on Individuals
Anti Money Laundering (AML)
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Presented by Phani Schiza Antoniou of Globalserve Consultants ltd
Fundamentals of Ethics
General Data Protection Regulation
Peter Johnson – The SMSF Expert
Corporations and Trusts Law Chapter 5 Management
FATF and MONEYVAL The soft law approach.
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING REGULATION IN THE EU: AN EXAMPLE OF DATA COLLECTION ON MONEY LAUNDERING by Barbara Vettori A presentation.
European actions.
Investor protection and MIFID
PART II.. PART II. AGENDA- PART II (chapter 5) Identification and client due diligence procedures Reliance on third parties Identification of individuals.
Compliance of Voluntary Organisations
Evaluation of non-criminal data
PRINCIPLES OF TRUST ONBOARDING
The European Anti-Corruption Report
IAPP TRUSTe SYMPOSIUM 9-11 JUNE 2004
Data Protection in Law Enforcement Area Chapter 9a of the draft law
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
The Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive
Compliance of Voluntary Organisations
Chapter 7 Corporate Governance.
Legal aspects of Corporate Business.
31st Conference of European Civil-Law Notaries Interconnection and Quality Salla Saastamoinen, Director of the Directorate for Civil and commercial.
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
The UK Trusts Register: Impact for non-UK trusts
ECA Quality Control Arrangements
Presentation transcript:

María del Carmen Miquel Lasso de la Vega EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES AND THE ROLE OF THE LAND AND BUSINESS REGISTRIES AGAINST MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM María del Carmen Miquel Lasso de la Vega Washington 20th March 2018

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

Directive (EU) 2015/849, the 5th anti-money laundering Directive: The main legal instrument in the prevention of the use of the Union's financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing It pursues the maximum possible transparency in financial transactions and all kinds of trust The Land and Business Registries can collaborate as an essential tool to fight against money laundering. This is why the Land Registries of Spain have created a special office to control and prevent money laundering and terrorism financing Next step is the interconnection between Land Registries and Business Registries in Europe.

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

Directive 2015/849 says in its article 3 Directive 2015/849 says in its article 3.6 people which must be identified: Natural persons who have a stake of over 25% in company’s share capitals, or own more than 25% of the costumer’s base Article 30 refers to trust: In the case of trust - all following persons: (i) the settlor(s); (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector(s), if any; (iv) the beneficiaries; or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates; (v) any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means.";

Directive 2015/849 says in its article 3 Directive 2015/849 says in its article 3.6 people which must be identified: And article 31 to fideicomisos: In the case of trusts - all following persons: (i) the settlor(s); (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector(s), if any; (iv) the beneficiaries; or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates; any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means."

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

This data must been kept in a National Central Registry such as could be the business or societies Registry or even another public Registry. This information must be: adequate, accurate and current on their beneficial ownership, including the details of the beneficial interests held. Member States shall ensure that breaches of this Article are subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or sanctions

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

The information on the beneficial ownership is accessible in all cases to: (a) competent authorities and FIUs, without any restriction; (b) obliged entities, within the framework of customer due diligence in accordance with Chapter II" (c) any member of general public …The persons referred to in point (c) shall be permitted to access at least the name, the month and year of birth and the country of residence and nationality of the beneficial owner as well as the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held Unrestricted access by competent authorities and FIUs to all information held in the Central Registry

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

The information referred to shall be available through the national registers and through the system of interconnection of registers for at least 5 years and no more than 10 years after the corporate or other legal entity has been struck off from the register By 26 June 2020, all trusts and legal arrangements which have a structure or functions similar to trusts governed under the law of Member States were duly identified and made subject to the obligations as set out in this Directive

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

Nowadays Spanish law does not allow knowing who the real owner in societies is because stake transactions only need public deed, and isn’t mandatory inscription, shares doesn’t need it either Notaries have a data base which obtain those data from public deeds, but: 1- Judges and Courts consider in most cases that public deed aren’t necessary for these transmitions 2- These deeds are, above all acts of statement 3- Criminal organisations do their conveyance with foreings notaries, in order to avoid this control 4- Stakes, shares or other kind on titles can be persecuted, be the subject of legal action by judges or administrative agents and those data aren’t integrated in the Notaries systems

What is the solution? The inscription of the transactions of the stakes in the Business Registries As a consequence… Ownership will be garantied and protected by law, Owner could improve its financial capacity, Member States will have a reliable tool States will benefite from having it to improve their financial situation and investments

Index: 1. European directives 1.1. Suspicious subjects 1.2. The essential aim is to find who the real owner is 1.3. Available information 1.4. Interconnection of National Central Registries 2. The role of the land and business Registries against money laundering and terrorism 2.1. Looking for the real owner 2.2. C.R.A.B. Land Registries Anti-money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

LAND REGISTRY ANTIMONEY LAUNDRING AND TERRORISM FINANCING OFFICE (C.R.A.B.)

C.R.A.B. : LAND REGISTRY ANTIMONEY LAUNDRING AND TERRORISM FINANCING OFFICE AIM: PREVENTIVE COLABORATION AND ALSO FOLLOW UP AND PENALIZATION MONEY LAUNDRING Collaboration from the beginning: 1- Law 19/1.993 it is not directly referred to land and Business Registars but it existed a general obligation on the part of public servents. Art.16 2- Regulation 925/95 was refered to Registars as collaborators 3- Concurrence of multiple subjects under obligation

C.R.A.B. : LAND REGISTRY ANTIMONEY LAUNDRING AND TERRORISM FINANCING OFFICE Law 10/2010 28 April: art.2 Subjects under obligation : Notaries and land , business and movable property Registars art.27 Centralized preventive bodies. Created by ministerial order Voluntary assignment except for Notaries and Registars CRAB is the centralized body of land , business and movable property Registars. Its function is to promote and collaboration between Registars and legal authorities, police and public servers to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing It controls Registries in this matter Total technical autonomy

Internal Evaluation Unit Verification of sanction list (E.U.) GOBERMENT BOARD PREVENT MONEY LAUNDERING COMISSION C.R.A.B. DIRECTOR GOBERMENT BOARD Internal Evaluation Unit Analyse Unit Unidad de Análisis Verification of sanction list (E.U.) Alalyse

COLLABORATION WITH AUTHORITIES IN PREVENTING AND ERRADICATING MONEY LAUNDRING 1- Businesses linked with money laundering and terrorist financing 2- It requires to be request, by the solicitor or authority 3- Information required: i- Current entitlements of natural or artificial person ii- Business positions of natural or artificial person iii- Inscriptions copies iv- Annual accounts copies

Internal Control Body

INTERNAL CONTROL BODY I 1- Follows procedures, rollout and problems in preventing money laundering, taking measures and developing internal rules in order to improve the system. 2- It decides which suspicious transactions must be communicated to the Executive service 3- To inform Registars on type of risk transactions 4- To adopt measures in order to garantie confidenciality 5- Definition of policies to adopt, and formulation of the rules for Registars in other to coordinate them

INTERNAL CONTROL BODY II 1-To analyse and evaluate money laundering evidences 2- To report and take de necessary corrective measures of the land and business Registry data base 3- To elaborate a yearly plan 4- To draft an annual report, with the relevant events about money laundering, and terrorism financing

INTERNAL CONTROL BODY III 1- To evaluate risks of Registars activity depending on geographic location, intervening parties and transactions 2- To check European lists of frozen assets 3- To give information to an external expert from the OCP 4- Control procedures of internal control by the Registars

Collaboration SEPLAC

COLLABORATION WITH SEPLAC 1- To exam and evaluate suspicious transaction 2- To centralize communications in terms of money laundering, and terrorism financing 3- To meet the requirements set by SEPLAC and legal authorities 4- TO OBTEIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE REAL BENEFICIAL OWNER, coming from suspicious transactions if it is not known