Standard II Randy Beach, ASCCC South Representative Stephanie Droker, Vice-President, ACCJC Deborah Wulff, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Cuesta College,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ACCJC Rubric and Beyond Julie Bruno, Sierra College Susan Clifford, ACCJC Fred Hochstaedter Monterey Peninsula College.
Advertisements

Student Services, Libraries and Equity in the Online Arena ASCCC Accreditation Institute 2015 Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Dolores Davison, Foothill.
Hot Topics in Distance Education: Avoiding the Landmines Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Spring Plenary Session April 9, 2015 Stephanie.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Illinois Community College Board DUAL CREDIT: Proposed Rule Revisions & Updates.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 The Basic Map: Course Outlines High quality course outlines are the foundations of.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
What CIOs Need to Know.  Meridith Randall – ACCJC ALO for 17 years for 3 different colleges; never had a college receive a sanction; has written multiple.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.
The Distance Ed Classroom, Online Student Services, and Standard II Putting Your Best Foot Forward Marissa Iliscupidez, Norco College Michael Heumann,
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
Regardless of Location or Means of Delivery: Meeting the Standards for Every Student Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Accreditation Self-Study
Hot Topics in Distance Education
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Online Education Regionals 8-9 April 2016
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Communication Coordination Consolidation Collaboration
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Randy Beach, south representative CraiG Rutan, Area D representative
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Accreditation News Misty Burruel, Chaffey College, Accreditation Committee Ginni May, ASCCC Area A Representative, Accreditation Committee Chair Fall.
Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Jarek Janio, Santa Ana College
Curriculum and Accreditation
Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Accreditation: Expanding our Perceptions
Curriculum Process now includes SLO Assessment Form
Standard III – Resources
Zaida O’Connor, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, College of the Canyons
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Presented by: Corinna Evett
Faculty Role in AP Credit
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Committee Purpose Roles COR Standards Curriculum Review Process
Accreditation and curriculum
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
Program Review Driving Curricular Revisions
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary
Faculty Leadership and the Role of the ASCCC
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
ACCREDITATION 101 Sam Foster, ASCCC Area D Representative
PLA from a SACSCOC Perspective
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
Teaching, Learning, and Advising at Penn State
Quality Matters Overview
The CVC-OEI Course Design Rubric and Your Curriculum
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

Standard II Randy Beach, ASCCC South Representative Stephanie Droker, Vice-President, ACCJC Deborah Wulff, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Cuesta College, Accreditation Committee

Description Accreditation is the review of academic quality of higher education institutions. Provisions of ACCJC’s Standard II: Student Learning Programs and Support Services ensure that all programs offered in the name of the college align to the institution’s mission and are conducted at levels of quality and rigor appropriate for higher education. This break-out will focus on the specific components of Standard II, including proposed changes to standard II.A.2.

What Brings You Here? Who’s in the room? What areas are confusing for you? What questions do you need answered?

Standard II: Student Learning Programs and Support Services Standard IIA Instructional Programs Standard IIB Library and Learning Support Services Standard IIC Student Services Accreditation 2014 Standards Annotated Accreditation Standards: 2014 Crosswalk and Glossary

IIA Instructional Programs: The Highlights Programs are appropriate to higher ed (II.A.1) Faculty are professional and continuously improve the programs (II.A.2) SLOs and course outlines (II.A.3) Pre-collegiate curriculum (II.A.4) Minimum degree requirements (II.A.5) Course scheduling supports students (II.A.6) Teaching methods and diverse learners (II.A.7) Validating program exams and prior learning (II.A.8)

IIA Instructional Programs Awarding credit on attainment of outcomes. Credits/clock hours (II.A.9) Transfer policies, comparable SLOs (II.A.10) Program SLOs and competencies (II.A.11) General Education (II.A.12) Programs are focused and based on outcomes (II.A.13) CTE grads meet employment/licensure standards (II.A.14) Program elimination (II.A.15) Program evaluation for continuous improvement (II.A.16)

IIB: Library and Support Services Services are provided for all students in all modalities (II.B.1) Educational equipment and materials (II.B.2) SLOs and evaluation of Library and Learning services (II.B.3) Agreements with other institutions ensure services provided meet the standards (II.B.4)

IIC: Student Support Services Regular evaluation of services regardless of location/modality (II.C.1) Learning Outcomes for student support services (II.C.2) Equitable access to services regardless of location/modality (II.C.3) Co-curriculur and athletic programs (II.C.4) Counseling and advising programs (II.C.5) Admissions policies. Defines/advises students on “pathways” (II.C.6) Evaluating admissions and placement tools (II.C.7) Student records (II.C.8)

IIA: Instructional Programs Faculty Role Administrative Role Team Role and Commission Support

IIB: Library and Support Services Faculty Role Administrative Role Team Role and Commission Support

IIC: Student Support Services Faculty Role Administrative Role Team Role and Commission Support

Standard II Student Learning Outcomes Where are you on your campus with SLOs? How are you using them to improve teaching, learning and student support? What support do you need from the commission? What are your questions?

Standard II: Distance Education What is the difference between DE and CE?? What should we know about DE and student services? What do we mean by regular and substantive interaction? What are your questions?

Standard II.A.2 Faculty, including full time, part time, and adjunct faculty, ensure that the content and methods of instruction meet generally accepted academic and professional standards and expectations. Faculty and others responsible act to continuously improve instructional courses, programs and directly related services through systematic evaluation to assure currency, improve teaching and learning strategies, and promote student success. Where are we now?

Questions Randy Beach, ASCCC South Representative, randy@asccc.org Stephanie Droker, Vice-President, ACCJC, sdroker@accjc.org Deborah Wulff, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Cuesta College, Accreditation Committee, deborah_wulff@cuesta.edu