Mo1674 DIFFERENCES IN DETECTION OF POLYP PATHOLOGY BASED ON ENDOSCOPIST CHARACTERISTICS AND EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF WITHDRAWAL TIME IN EXPLAINING.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study Andreas Stang, MD, MPH, Thomas.

Advertisements

CA11-19: a tumor marker for the detection of colorectal cancer

The addition of histology to continuous audit has significantly increased adenoma detection rate in a private endoscopy unit AG Fraser 1, GD Gamble 1,

Optical biopsy for colorectal polyps: moving along the S-shaped curve

Terry L. Jue, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Set higher adenomas per colonoscopy benchmark

Su1388 IS EUS GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY READY FOR PRIME TIME? YES

Su1569 The Morphological Assessment of Large Sessile Polyps and Laterally Spreading Tumors of the Colon: An Educational Exercise Assessing Current Knowledge.

Fecal Immunochemical Test Detects Sessile Serrated Adenomas and Polyps With a Low Level of Sensitivity Li-Chun Chang, Chia-Tung Shun, Weng-Feng Hsu,

Sa1491 The Role of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the Management of Intrabiliary Rupture of Liver Hydatid Cysts (IBRH): Follow-Up.

Su1116 US VETERANS WITH PERSISTENT INDEFINITE FOR DYSPLASIA ARE AT INCREASED RISK OF DYSPLASTIC PROGRESSION Andrew J. Henn, Kevin Song, Amy Gravely,

939 GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS MODERATE CONSCIOUS SEDATION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON OUTCOMES WITH SELECTIVE SEDATION IN ERCP Ravi J. Patel, Eric M. Nelsen,

Su1720 PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE HEMORRHOIDAL ENERGY TREATMENT PROCEDURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BLEEDING INTERNAL HEMORRHOIDS Truptesh H. Kothari,

Su1690 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ADEQUATE BOWEL PREPARATION ON SUBSEQUENT COLONOSCOPY IN INPATIENTS WITH AN INADEQUATE INITIAL COLONOSCOPY Shashank Sarvepalli,

Sa1932 EFFICACY OF COMBINED TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION AND LAPAROSCOPIC HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR Kelly Wang, Farhaad Khan, Linda A. Hou, Sofiya.

Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate Heitham Abdul-Baki, MD, Robert E. Schoen,

Quality improvement for the gastroenterology fellow

Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Douglas K. Rex,

Sa1227 PREDICTIVE RISK MODEL FOR POST-ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION ULCER BLEEDING OF STOMACH: SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY Yeon Hwa Choe, Jun Chul.

Su1133 NATIONAL TRENDS IN INPATIENT ADMISSIONS AND OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL FOREIGN BODIES Malav P. Parikh, Niyati M. Gupta, Akhil Singhal,

Mo1704 NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVICES INCREASE SESSILE SERRATED ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN COLONOSCOPY – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META- ANALYSIS Elijah Verheyen,

Mo1717 HOW TO CREATE AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE FOR HNPCC (LYNCH SYNDROME) FROM EXISTING SOFTWARE PROGRAMS: MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER HNPCC SURVEILLANCE.

Sa1262 ENDOSCOPIC FEATURES OF PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GASTRIC CANCER Joao Guilherme Guerra,

237 EFFICACY OF ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF OBESITY: A META-ANALYSIS TO COMPARE ENDOSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTROPLASTY, ASPIRE ASSIST AND POSE

Sa1066 SCOPING THE SCOPE: ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF ENDOSCOPE WORKING CHANNEL DAMAGE/DEBRIS USING A NOVEL FLEXIBLE INSPECTION SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT OF.

383 2-L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid Versus 4-L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Simethicone Lavage Solution for Colonoscopy Stefano Pontone, Rita.

537 RISK SCORE AND PREDICTORS FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION FAILURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPY Josiah D. McCain, Fernando F. Stancampiano, Ernest P. Bouras,

Joshua P. Landreneau, Andrew T. Strong, Kevin M

Su1419 A MULTI-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 336 EUS-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE CORE LIVER BIOPSY WITH A MODIFIED 1-PASS 1-ACTUATION WET SUCTION TECHNIQUE COMPARING.

Mo1382 EUS-Guided Needle-Based Confocal Laser Induced Endomicroscopy (nCLE): A Correlation Study of “Through the Needle” Imaging With Normal Histology.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Tu1898 UTILITY OF NEW CHOLANGIOSCOPES (SPYGLASS DS) IN BILIARY DISEASES: EXPERIENCE OF A SINGLE TERTIARY CARE CENTER Abed AlLehibi, Abdullah Almtawa,

Mo1727 COLONOSCOPIC TATTOO PLACEMENT FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PATIENT OUTCOMES AT LARGE CANCER CENTER Adam E. Prescott, Stephanie.

611 COVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS FOR POST ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANT: IS 1-YEAR OF INDWELLING BETTER THAN 6 MONTHS? Silvia M. Reimão, Fernanda.

Sa1331 UNILATERAL VERSUS BILATERAL METAL STENTS FOR INOPERABLE MALIGNANT HILAR BILIARY STRICTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META- ANALYSIS Tariq A. Hammad,

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of chronic pancreatitis: is there room for improvement? James J. Farrell, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Sa1890 ROBOT-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION USING DISPOSABLE TIP-MOUNTED ROBOTIC MODULE: FIRST EX VIVO RESULTS Joshua B. Gafford, Hiroyuki.

Mo1113 RATE OF BLEEDING ON ANTIPLATELET AND ANTICOAGULANT AGENTS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SINGLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY Abhik Bhattacharya, Alfred Nelson,

Anna M. Duloy, MD, Tonya R. Kaltenbach, MD, MS, Rajesh N

Postcolonoscopy mortality: Bowel preparation to blame?

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Su1466 Multiple Pseudocysts Managed With Transpapillary Drainage

934 AUDIT AND FEEDBACK FOR COLONOSCOPY IMPROVES ENDOSCOPIST PERFORMANCE AMONGST POOR PERFORMERS: RESULTS FROM A PRAGMATIC RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Mo1335 LUMEN-APPOSING METAL STENT PLACEMENT FOR WALLED-OFF PANCREATIC NECROSIS: RESULTS OF A PRACTICE PATTERN SURVEY OF US GASTROENTEROLOGISTS M. Phillip.

Nasim Parsa, MD, Douglas K. Rex, MD VideoGIE

Su1391 COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC YEILD AND SAFETY OF 1ST GENERATION EUS CORE BIOPSY NEEDLES WITH FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION AND NEXT GENERATION EUS CORE.

932 POLYPS RETRIEVED WHEN TRAP IS ATTACHED TO INSTRUMENT PORT ARE MORE FREQUENTLY INTACT AND INTERPRETABLE THAN WHEN REMOVED BY CONVENTIONAL METHOD

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Mo1157 ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD) Noemi J. Baffy, Jennifer.

Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Mo1662 SMSA-EMR SCORE IS A NOVEL ENDOSCOPIC RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR PREDICTING CRITICAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OUTCOMES Mayenaaz Sidhu, David.

Ihab I. Elhajj, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Gavin C. Harewood, MD, FRCPI, MSc Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Table of Contents Nurse Leader Volume 16, Issue 3, (June 2018)

Mo1114 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH REBLEEDING AFTER ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS. A RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-CENTER STUDY

Sa1320 EFFICACY OF PER-ORAL CHOLANGIOSCOPY WITH INTRADUCTAL LITHOTRIPSY FOR DIFFICULT BILIARY STONES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Thomas R.

Inadequate colonoscopy preparation: Is it time to send out an SMS?

Position change during colonoscope withdrawal increases polyp and adenoma detection in the right but not in the left side of the colon: results of a randomized.

Tu1416 REDUCTION IN LENGTH OF STAY, HOSPITAL COSTS AND HOSPITAL CHARGES FOR ALL-CAUSE ERCPS PERFORMED OVER THE WEEKEND VERSUS ERCPS THAT WERE POSTPONED.

Tu1150 A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF ENDOSCOPIC RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION IN TREATING EARLY ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL NEOPLASIA∼LESSONS FROM PATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

645 DOUBLE PIGTAIL STENT PLACEMENT THROUGH LUMEN APPOSING METAL STENTS REDUCES ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEED FOR REINTERVENTION Steven Shamah, Irving Waxman,

Shashank Sarvepalli, Ari Garber, Awad Jarrar, John McMichael, James M

404 A RANDOMIZED, ASSESSOR-BLINDED, MULTICENTER, DOSE-RANGING STUDY INVESTIGATING THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND TOLERABILITY OF SODIUM PICOSULFATE, MAGNESIUM.

Does it matter what day of the week you have your colonoscopy?

766 RESUMPTION OF ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY AFTER ROUTINE ENDOSCOPY: PHYSICIAN DOCUMENTATION AND PATIENT OUTCOMES Erica Donnan, Philip Dinh, Dyanna L. Gregory,

Sa1947 ENDOSCOPIC SINUSOTOMY VS

Su1425 Efficacy of Endotherapy in Chronic Pancreatitis Pain: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis Mikram Jafri, Javed N. Sadiq, Pallav K. Parakh, Frank.

Presentation transcript:

Mo1674 DIFFERENCES IN DETECTION OF POLYP PATHOLOGY BASED ON ENDOSCOPIST CHARACTERISTICS AND EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF WITHDRAWAL TIME IN EXPLAINING THESE DIFFERENCES Shashank Sarvepalli, Ari Garber, Maged Rizk, Gareth Morris-Stiff, John McMichael, Michael Rothberg, Sobia N. Laique Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages AB472-AB473 (June 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2032 Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Table 1- Differences in sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSP), adenoma detection rate (AD), advanced adenoma detection rate (AAD), and withdrawal times (WT) based on various endoscopist characteristics. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, AB472-AB473DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2032) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Table 2- Adjusted analysis of factors associated with sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSP), adenoma detection rate (AD), advanced adenoma detection rate (AAD) Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, AB472-AB473DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2032) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions