Uma B. Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L. Nicotra  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Darren M Brown, Erkki Ruoslahti  Cancer Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
CENP-C Is a Structural Platform for Kinetochore Assembly
Yalei Chen, Melissa M. Rolls, William O. Hancock  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells 
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
Overcoming Hybridization Barriers by the Secretion of the Maize Pollen Tube Attractant ZmEA1 from Arabidopsis Ovules  Mihaela L. Márton, Astrid Fastner,
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Nonmuscle Myosin II Isoforms Coassemble in Living Cells
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Elif Nur Firat-Karalar, Navin Rauniyar, John R. Yates, Tim Stearns 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Jennifer J Kohler, Carolyn R Bertozzi  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Control of Local Rho GTPase Crosstalk by Abr
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Darren M Brown, Erkki Ruoslahti  Cancer Cell 
Fluorogenic Probe for Constitutive Cellular Endocytosis
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
CENP-C Is a Structural Platform for Kinetochore Assembly
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Kevin M. Marks, Michael Rosinov, Garry P. Nolan  Chemistry & Biology 
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
The Requirement for the Dam1 Complex Is Dependent upon the Number of Kinetochore Proteins and Microtubules  Laura S. Burrack, Shelly E. Applen, Judith.
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Amphiregulin Exosomes Increase Cancer Cell Invasion
Regulation of Golgi Cisternal Progression by Ypt/Rab GTPases
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Yuri Oleynikov, Robert H. Singer  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Yun Wah Lam, Angus I. Lamond, Matthias Mann, Jens S. Andersen 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Disruption of the Rag-Ragulator Complex by c17orf59 Inhibits mTORC1
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages (December 2005)
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Growth Factor-Dependent Trafficking of Cerebellar NMDA Receptors via Protein Kinase B/Akt Phosphorylation of NR2C  Bo-Shiun Chen, Katherine W. Roche 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 15, Pages (August 2016)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Allorecognition Proteins in an Invertebrate Exhibit Homophilic Interactions  Uma B. Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L. Nicotra  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages 2845-2850 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.030 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ectopic Expression of Single Alr1 and Alr2 Proteins Causes CHO Cells to Aggregate (A) Domain architecture and cloning strategy for Alr1 and Alr2. Coding sequences of Alr1 or Alr2 were cloned into the mammalian expression vector pFLAG-CMV3 such that the expressed protein bore a mammalian N-terminal pre-protrypsin leader sequence and a FLAG octopeptide followed by the sequence of Alr1/2 starting immediately after the Hydractinia signal peptide. See also Table S1. (B and C) Surface expression of FLAG-Alr1/2 on CHO cells. CHO cells were transiently co-transfected with pmCherry-C1 (red) and either pFLAG-Alr1f (B) or pFLAG-Alr2f (C) and then subsequently fixed and stained with a mouse anti-FLAG primary antibody followed by an Alexa-488-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (green) and DAPI (blue) and then imaged with confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 10 μm. (D) CHO cells co-express GFP and FLAG-Alr1f. Contour plot validating co-expression of GFP and FLAG-Alr1f in a representative flow cytometry experiment. CHO cells were transiently co-transfected with pFLAG-Alr1f and pmaxGFP, incubated for 24 hr, stained with mouse anti-FLAG primary antibody and an Alexa-647-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody, and visualized via flow cytometry. (E–H) CHO cells co-expressing FLAG-Alr1f (E), FLAG-Alr1r (F), FLAG-Alr2f (G), or FLAG-Alr2r (H), and GFP form multicellular aggregates. (I) CHO cells expressing only the GFP reporter construct do not aggregate. In (E)–(I), the left image is a bright-field image, and the right image is blue-light fluorescence. Scale bars, 100 μm. Current Biology 2015 25, 2845-2850DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.030) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Homophilic Binding of Alr1 and Alr2 Is Isoform Specific (A) Bi-colored cell aggregate formed when CHO cells transiently transfected with FLAG-Alr1f and GFP were co-incubated with CHO cells transiently transfected with FLAG-Alr1f and RFP. (B) Same as (A) but with Alr1r. (C) Single-color aggregates formed when CHO cells transiently transfected with Alr1f and GFP and were subsequently co-incubated with cells transiently transfected with Alr1r and RFP. (D) Bi-colored cell aggregate formed when CHO cells transiently transfected with FLAG-Alr2f and GFP were co-incubated with CHO cells transiently transfected with FLAG-Alr2f and RFP. (E) Same as (D) but with Alr2r. (F) Single-color aggregates formed when CHO cells were transiently transfected with Alr2f and GFP and subsequently co-incubated with cells transiently transfected with Alr2r and RFP. Current Biology 2015 25, 2845-2850DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.030) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Multiple Alr1 and Alr2 Alleles Exhibit Isoform-Specific Homophilic Binding (A) Summary of aggregation assays performed with additional Alr1 and Alr2 isoforms. (B) Number and location of amino acid differences between isoforms tested in (A). Each row represents a pairwise combination of Alr1 (top) or Alr2 (bottom) isoforms tested. For each pair, the number and location of mismatched amino acids is shown with respect to the IgSF-like domains and spacer region, as illustrated in the cartoon. Outcome of each binding assay is shown in right-hand column. The average length of each extracellular domain is shown in parentheses. Size of domain 1 excludes FLAG tag and linker. Intensity of red coloration indicates relative amount of variation. Current Biology 2015 25, 2845-2850DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.030) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions