Volume 160, Issue 3, Pages (January 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 160, Issue 3, Pages (January 2015)
Cosuppression in Drosophila: Gene Silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh Transgenes Is Polycomb Dependent  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 155, Issue 7, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Wen Tang, Shikui Tu, Heng-Chi Lee, Zhiping Weng, Craig C. Mello  Cell 
The dsRNA Binding Protein RDE-4 Interacts with RDE-1, DCR-1, and a DExH-Box Helicase to Direct RNAi in C. elegans  Hiroaki Tabara, Erbay Yigit, Haruhiko.
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
David J. Katz, T. Matthew Edwards, Valerie Reinke, William G. Kelly 
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
A Cytoplasmic Argonaute Protein Promotes the Inheritance of RNAi
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Hierarchical Rules for Argonaute Loading in Drosophila
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages e4 (February 2017)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (October 1999)
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
An RNA-Binding Multimer Specifies Nematode Sperm Fate
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
A Neuronal piRNA Pathway Inhibits Axon Regeneration in C. elegans
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
DNA Methylation Mediated by a MicroRNA Pathway
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
A Broadly Conserved Pathway Generates 3′UTR-Directed Primary piRNAs
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Tetsushi Iida, Rika Kawaguchi, Jun-ichi Nakayama  Current Biology 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 151, Issue 7, Pages (December 2012)
Baekgyu Kim, Kyowon Jeong, V. Narry Kim  Molecular Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages (October 2009)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Target-Mediated Protection of Endogenous MicroRNAs in C. elegans
Maternal piRNAs Are Essential for Germline Development following De Novo Establishment of Endo-siRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans  Bruno F.M. de Albuquerque,
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Sang-Hyun Song, Chunhui Hou, Ann Dean  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Hierarchical Rules for Argonaute Loading in Drosophila
Presentation transcript:

Volume 160, Issue 3, Pages 407-419 (January 2015) A Ribonuclease Coordinates siRNA Amplification and mRNA Cleavage during RNAi  Hsin-Yue Tsai, Chun-Chieh G. Chen, Darryl Conte, James J. Moresco, Daniel A. Chaves, Shohei Mitani, John R. Yates, Ming-Daw Tsai, Craig C. Mello  Cell  Volume 160, Issue 3, Pages 407-419 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 rde-8 Encodes a Conserved Ribonuclease Required for RNAi (A) Graphical representation of RNAi sensitivity in WT, rde-8(ne3361), and transgenic strains (as indicated). Percent lethal indicates the mean percentage of pos-1 dead eggs (green bars) or the percentage of let-2 ruptured or sterile adults observed (red bars). n, number of animals exposed to RNAi. (B) Schematic of the rde-8 locus showing exons (boxes) and intron (lines) with the ribonuclease domain shaded light brown. Deletion (red lines) and nonsense (asterisk) alleles are indicated. The alignment shows C. elegans (ce), Drosophila (dm), mouse (mm), and human (hs) homologs with conserved residues (shaded brown) and catalytic residues (black background). The asterisk indicates the tryptophan codon (W) mutated in three nonsense alleles. (C) Immunoblot analysis of RDE-8, GFP::RDE-8, and GFP::RDE-8(D76N) protein expression. Tubulin was probed as a loading control. Asterisks (∗) indicate prominent non-specific bands detected by RDE-8 antibody. (D) Coomassie blue staining of purified WT and D76N recombinant RDE-8 proteins. (E) Denaturing PAGE analysis of recombinant RDE-8 nuclease activity. RDE-8 protein at different concentrations (indicated) was incubated with a 116-nt sel-1 RNA (nt 414–529) internally labeled with 32P-UTP. See also Figure S1. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RDE-8 Promotes RdRP-Dependent Small RNA Accumulation (A and B) Northern blot analyses of antisense sel-1 siRNAs in WT, rde-8 mutant, and mutant transgenic strains (as indicated). The probe hybridizes just upstream (5′) of the sel-1 dsRNA trigger region (shown in C). let-7 and miR-66 miRNAs were probed as loading controls. (C) Histograms showing sense (blue) and antisense (red) small RNA reads mapping to the sel-1 gene. Reads were normalized to total non-structural reads. The sel-1 exons (boxes) and introns (lines) are indicated at bottom; dashed lines delineate the dsRNA trigger region. (D) Dot plots of endogenous 22G-RNAs targeting annotated genes in rde-8 (ne3361) mutant (top) and mutant transgenic strains (as indicated) gfp::rde-8(D76N) (middle) or gfp::rde-8(+) (bottom) compared to WT. “rpm” indicates the number of reads per million total reads for a given gene. The black diagonal indicates x = y. Dashed lines (gray) demark regions where loci show the indicated fold decrease of 22G-RNA reads compared to WT. Gray dots indicate loci that change less than 2-fold. (E) Box and whisker plots comparing ERGO-1, WAGO, and CSR-1 pathway 22G-RNAs in rde-8(ne3361) mutant (pink) and mutant gfp::rde-8 transgenic lines (+, orange; D76N, green). The ratio of mutant/(mutant + WT) is shown. The 75th through 25th percentile are boxed, with the median value shown as a horizontal line within the box. Dashed lines indicate 2-fold enrichment (top) and depletion (bottom). (F) Dot plots of endogenous 26G-RNA levels in rde-8 (ne3361) mutant (left) and mutant gfp::rde-8(D76N) transgenic animals (right) compared to WT. Red dots represent ERGO-1 targets (Vasale et al., 2010), and gray dots represent loci with non-ERGO-1-associated 26 nt antisense reads. See also Figure S2. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RDE-8 Interacts with Mutator Components and RDE-8 Homologs (A) Proteins identified by MudPIT analysis of GFP immunoprecipitates from transgenic gfp::rde-8(+) worms but not from WT worms that do not express GFP::RDE-8. The percent coverage and total number of peptides are indicated for each RDE-8 interactor. (B) Graphical representation of RNAi sensitivity of WT or mutant strains (as indicated). Percent lethal indicates the mean percentage of pos-1 dead eggs (green bars) or the percentage of let-2 ruptured or sterile adults observed (red bars). n, number of animals exposed to RNAi. (C) Dot plots (as described in Figure 2D) of endogenous 22G-RNAs targeting annotated genes in nyn-1(tm5004);nyn-2(tm4844) double mutants compared to WT. (D) Box and whisker plots (as described in Figure 2E) comparing ERGO-1, WAGO, and CSR-1 pathway 22G-RNAs in rde-8(ne3361) (orange), nyn-1(tm5004);nyn-2(tm4844) double mutants (blue), and rde-8(ne3361);nyn-1(tm5004);nyn-2(tm4844) triple mutants (brown) relative to WT. See also Figure S3. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 GFP::RDE-8 Localizes to Perinuclear Foci in the Germline (A) Immunoblot analysis of RDE-8 protein from WT grown at 20° and 25°C (hermaphrodites), fem-1(hc17) grown at 25°C (females), fog-2(q71) (males), and from glp-4(bn2) animals that lack a germline at 25°C (no germline). (B and C) Confocal images of dissected gonads. In (B), gonads expressing GFP::RDE-8 (green) were stained with the MAb414 to detect nuclear pore complex (NPC) proteins (red) and Hoechst to detect DNA (blue). Image overlay at right. In (C), gonads express both GFP::RDE-8 (green) and the constitutive P granule component, RFP::PGL-1 (red). Image overlay at right. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 RDE-8 Promotes RdRP Activity In Vitro (A) Top: in vitro RdRP activity assayed in WT, rde-8(ne3361), rrf-1(pk1417), or rde-3(ne3370) lysates in the presence (+) or absence (–) of in-vitro-transcribed and capped RNA template. “pA” denotes that a polyA stretch was added to the 3′ end of the template. Incubation times are indicated in minutes (min). Oligonucleotide size markers are indicated. “Δ” represents uridylated template RNA (Aoki et al., 2007). Bottom: Immunoblot analysis of RRF-1, RDE-8, and PRG-1 (loading control) protein levels in lysates used for the RdRP assay. (B) In vitro RdRP activity assayed in sel-1 dsRNA-fed, gfp::rde-8(WT) and gfp::rde-8(D76N) lysates in the presence (+) of in-vitro-transcribed and capped RNA template, as in (A). Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 RDE-8 Binds Target mRNA Downstream of RDE-1 (A and B) Bar graphs depicting RT-qPCR results of sel-1 mRNA levels in GFP immunoprecipitates divided by levels in control IgG precipitates. All strains assayed were rde-8(ne3361) and transgenic for gfp::rde-8(D76N), except for one strain that was transgenic for gfp::rde-8(+) (orange bar in B). In (A), a schematic diagram of the sel-1 locus shows the region targeted by dsRNA and the four regions assayed by RT-qPCR. In (A), absence of sel-1 dsRNA (–) served as a specificity control for each region assayed. In (B), all strains were exposed to sel-1 dsRNA and were assayed for region II. See also Figure S4. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 RDE-8 Promotes Target mRNA Cleavage and 3′ Uridylation Adjacent to Sites of Secondary siRNA Initiation (A) Bar graphs showing the percentage of untemplated residues detected by 3′ RACE at 3′ ends of sel-1 mRNA fragments during sel-1(RNAi). WT or rde-8(ne3361) animals were exposed to control dsRNA (–) or sel-1 dsRNA for 1, 3, or 7 hr. (B) Bar graphs, as in (A), showing the percentage of sel-1 mRNA fragments with 1, 2, 3, or 4+ untemplated uridine residues during sel-1(RNAi). (C) Sequence alignment of uridylation sites in WT (magenta) and D76N (blue) within the region of sel-1 just 5′ of the dsRNA trigger. 3′ RACE products were sequenced at four time points: prior to dsRNA exposure (0 hr) and after 1, 3, or 7 hr (as indicated). The 5′ ends of 22G-siRNAs (plotted below the sequence, orange bars) were identified in the rde-8(ne3361); gfp::rde-8(+) transgenic strain. Three time points are shown. The sel-1 exon (box), intron (line) structure, the dsRNA trigger region, and the region of sequence analyzed are indicated in the schematic. (D) Sequence alignment, as in (C), showing uridylation sites in RdRP and rde-3 mutants. The rrf-1 glp-4(bn2) background was used to remove RdRP activity in each strain analyzed, including rde-8(ne3361);gfp::rde-8(+) (WT, purple), rde-8(ne3361);gfp::rde-8(D76N) (D76N, blue), and rde-3(ne3370) (green). (E) RDE-8 coordinates siRNA amplification and mRNA cleavage during RNAi. See Discussion for details of the model. See also Figure S6. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 RDE-8 Is Required for Germline Transgene Silencing and Orsay Virus Immunity, Related to Figure 1 (A) let-858::gfp expression in WT and rde-8(ne3361) worms. GFP is expressed in the somatic nuclei (white arrows) of both WT and rde-8(ne3361) worms. GFP is silenced in the germline of WT worms, but is expressed in the germline nuclei (yellow arrows) of rde-8(ne3361) worms. (B) Western blot analysis of RDE-8 proteins in WT, rde-8(ne3361), or gfp::rde-8(+), gfp::rde-8(D157,158A), and gfp::rde-8(D76N) transgenic lines. The transgenes are present in the rde-8(ne3361) background, which appears to be null for RDE-8 protein. (C) Bar graph showing RT-qPCR analysis to detect the Orsay virus RNA genome in WT, rde-1(ne300), rde-8(ne3361), or gfp::rde-8(+) and gfp::rde-8(D76N) transgenic worms 60 hr after infection. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Analyses of Small-RNA Sequencing Data from N2 and rde-8(ne3361), Related to Figure 2 (A) Slope chart showing the altered distribution of small RNAs mapping to different genomic loci between N2 (WT) and rde-8(ne3361). The data are represented as the percent of all non-structural RNA (rRNA and tRNA) reads. (B) Stacked bar graphs showing the number of reads per million non-structural reads for each length (x axis) and for each starting nucleotide (y axis) of small RNAs cloned from N2 (WT, left) and rde-8(ne3361) (right). Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 RDE-8 Interacts with ERI-1 and Functions in the Same siRNA Pathways as NYN-1 and NYN-2, Related to Figure 3 (A) Immunoblot analysis of size exclusion chromatography fractions from WT worm lysate to detect DCR-1 and RDE-8 proteins. Size markers are designated at the corresponding fractions. (B) Immunoblot analysis to detect components of the ERI/DICER complex in RDE-8 immunoprecipitates. (C) Scatter plot comparing the levels of 22G-RNAs in reads per million (rpm) targeting protein-coding loci between WT and the rde-8(ne3361); nyn-1(tm4844); nyn-2(tm5004) triple mutant. The black diagonal indicates x = y. The dashed gray lines from the x axis to the corresponding unit on the y axis indicate the fold decrease of 22G-RNA reads in the rde-8(ne3361); nyn-1(tm4844); nyn-2(tm5004) triple mutant compared to WT worms. (D) Northern blots analysis of various small RNAs in nyn-1 and nyn-2 single and double mutant strains. SL1 and mir-66 are loading controls. Tc1, K02E2.6, and Y47H10A.5 are WAGO-, ERI-, and RDE-1-dependent 22G-RNAs, respectively. siR26-342 is an ERGO-1-dependent 26G-RNA. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 RDE-8 Acts Downstream of RDE-1/siRNA Complex Formation, Related to Figure 6 (A) Immunoblot analysis to detect RDE-1 captured on a 2′–O–methyl oligonucleotide complementary to primary siRNA in either WT or rde-8(ne3361) lysate. (B) Immunoblot analysis to detect RDE-1 or GFP::RDE-8 captured on 2′–O–methyl oligonucleotides with sense (S) or antisense (AS) polarity relative to the RNAi target, and in the presence (+) or absence (–) of RNAi. (C) Immunoblot analysis to detect RDE-1 or GFP::RDE-8 in GFP::RDE-8 immunoprecipitates in the presence (+) or absence (–) of RNAi. (D) Bar graph showing the relative expression of sel-1 mRNA in WT (N2) worms, rde-1(AAA) mutant worms, or rde-1(AAA); rde-8(D76N) mutant worms in the presence or absence of sel-1(RNAi). See Extended Experimental Procedures for strain details. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Modified 3′ RACE Procedure, Related to the Experimental Procedures Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S6 RDE-8 Promotes 3′ Uridylation of mRNA 5′ Cleavage Products during RNAi, Related to Figure 7 Histograms show the number of normalized reads per million at each position that are not 3′ modified or that are modified by untemplated 3′ addition of A, C, G, and U residues in gfp::rde-8(+) and gfp::rde-8(D76N) worms after 1, 3, or 7 hr of sel-1(RNAi). The untemplated 3′ addition of U residues in N2 and rde-8(ne3361) for the 1, 3, or 7 hr is also shown. The initiation sites of antisense siRNAs (Figure 7) are also shown. The vertical dashed line indicates the start of the sel-1 dsRNA trigger region. Green arrows indicate common uridylation sites between the two experiments, and the numbers indicate proximal siRNA initiation and 3′ uridylation sites. Cell 2015 160, 407-419DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.010) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions