July 9, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r0 Nov. 12, 2001 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MAC CTRB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /503r0 Submission November 2001 Jay Bain Time Domain, Mark Schrader Eastman KodakSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /115r0 Submission February 2001 Mark Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /115r1 Submission February 2001 Mark Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Power Control and Automatic Frequency Offset Control.
Doc.: IEEE c SubmissionSlide 1 Qualcomm 2/29/2016 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /440r2 Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: IEEE :
Doc.: IEEE /076r0 Submission Feb Dr. William ShvodianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
January, 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 January, 2002
2018/4/ /4/18 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Overview of Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <01/xxx>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Bi-Directional CTA] Date Submitted: [July.
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e > <Sep 2008>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 1999 doc.: IEEE /133r0 November 1999
November 2008 doc.: IEEE November 2008
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
7/20/2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Throughput calculation discussion] Date Submitted:
NOV 01 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Application Specific Information Element] Date.
Submission Title: [Extend-Superframe and Extend-GTS Structure]
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
Submission Title: [Proposals for MAC Issues]
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> 12/8/2018
Submission Title: [Extend-Superframe and GTS Structure]
Novemember, 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3 MAC Subcommittee Merged MAC Report.
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> January 2001
Submission Title: IEEE : Management Slots in the MAC.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improved Delayed ACK response Frame for.
< November, 2011 > Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [More Low Energy Mechanism Details]
Submission Title: IEEE : Overview of Power Save Proposal.
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: [Pugh Selection Process Clarification]
Submission Title: IEEE : Management Slots in the MAC.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Resolutions for CID 85, 86, and 87]
Submission Title: [Shared GTS Structure]
Mar Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [CTA Advertisement for Overlapping Piconets]
January, 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 January, 2002
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Supporting peer to peer and improving throughput by.
Submission Title: [Proposal to split the TG3a into two]
24 February 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues with Beacon-Mode SuperFrame.
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> November 2000
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
<month year> doc.: IEEE e doc.: IEEE < e >
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> Nov, 2008
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
September 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG3 Rank Order Voting Process Description.
4 May 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues with Beacon-Mode SuperFrame Structure.
September 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Discussion on MAC functionalities Date.
July 9, 2001 doc.: IEEE /330r0 July 9, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Bi-Directional CTA] Date Submitted: [July.
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Modified Delayed (Dly) Acknowledgement for.
Submission Title: [Extend-Superframe and GTS Structure]
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Submission Title: IEEE : Overview of Power Save Proposal.
January 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Study Group Summary and Motion for .15WG.
18 March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Superframe Extension for ] Date.
Submission Title: [Argument for PNC Controlled Latency]
March, 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [proposed merger] Date Submitted: [8 March,
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Dimming support solutions of PHYs in IEEE
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
August, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improve the latency between GTS request.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Presentation transcript:

July 9, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r0 Nov. 12, 2001 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MAC CTRB Parameters Issues Date Submitted: [9 July 2001] Source: [Mark E. Schrader] Company [Eastman Kodak Co.] Address [4545 E. River Rd., Rochester, NY 14650-0898] Voice:[+1.716.781.9561], FAX: [+1.716.781.9733], E-Mail:[mark.e.schrader@kodak.com] Re: [IEEE 802.15.3 MAC] Abstract: QoS based Channel Time Request Block parameters are defined mathematically. Some issues and limits of the timing are defined and briefly discussed. QoS is shown to to simple from the PNC perspective when only allocated bandwidth is important.. Purpose: Channel Time Request Block parameters toward building a QoS algorithm. Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 Document Overview Propose the smallest set (3) of Channel Time Request Block (CTRB) parameters usable for QoS-based requests. Define the parameters mathematically with variables that are usable by the channel time requestor. Identify issues and solutions. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Variable Definitions fd = bits per second of delivered data. Nov. 12, 2001 Variable Definitions fd = bits per second of delivered data. NB = bits of source buffer available to store the data to be communicated. NMPDU = bits of the data portion of one packet of data. NOH = Equivalent bits of overhead of one packet of data including: actual MAC header bits, slot guard times, PHY or PLCP overhead, etc., everything-but-data, etc. It simplifies the explanation to express this as an equivalent number of bits. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Definitions Continued Nov. 12, 2001 Definitions Continued NE = Channel (PHY) encoding, bits per symbol fs = Channel symbol rate, symbols per second. Tbcn = Beacon Period Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

CTRB Parameter 1: Allocation Period, TAP Nov. 12, 2001 CTRB Parameter 1: Allocation Period, TAP TAP = NB / fd This is how often the NB buffer must be sent to get the desired delivered data rate fd. This is the size of the source buffer divided by the desired data rate. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 Relationships I We need to send NP packets over the network in order to transmit one buffer: NP = NB / NMPDU Assume an integer for simplicity. NT = NMPDU + NOH, the total number of symbols that would have to be sent over the network to cover both the data and the overhead. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

CTRB Parameter 2: GTS Time Per Allocation Period, TGTS Nov. 12, 2001 CTRB Parameter 2: GTS Time Per Allocation Period, TGTS TGTS is the total time requested for GTS allocated in order to send one buffer of data. TGTS = ( NP NT / NE fS ). For the sending NP packets, of equivalent size, NT = ( NMPDU + NOH ) with a PHY encoding of NE bits per symbol and a PHY symbol rate of fS. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

July 9, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r0 Nov. 12, 2001 Relationships 2 1 / NE fS is a constant as long as the symbol rate and encoding method is unchanged. From before: NP = NB / NMPDU Stating the obvious: NT and NP will also be constants if the transmit packet size and the transmit buffer size both remain constant. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

CTRB Parameter 3: Maximum Allocation Delay, TMAD Nov. 12, 2001 CTRB Parameter 3: Maximum Allocation Delay, TMAD TMAD defines an allowable time jitter to the allocation of time slots by the piconet coordinator, PNC. The maximum allocation delay starts before the end of the allocation period, but does not affect the PNC’s reference timing of the TAP period. It allows some variability in position of the GTS slot(s).. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 The TGTS (blue) time is the total amount of slot time that must be allocated by the PNC within the TMAD (green) time centered around the start of the TAP interval (vertical arrows). TAP ½TMAD ½TMAD TMAD TMAD TGTS Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Possible PNC Slot Allocations Nov. 12, 2001 Possible PNC Slot Allocations TMAD TAP Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Proposed Fragmentation Policy Nov. 12, 2001 Proposed Fragmentation Policy The PNC shall provide the GTS time in as few time slots as possible. The PNC may provide more GTS time than the amount requested. The PNC shall create at least one slot for each distinct channel time request. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Proposed CTRB Structure Nov. 12, 2001 Proposed CTRB Structure Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Proposed CTRB Fields Target Address Octets: 1 EPS status 1 Stream Nov. 12, 2001 Target Address Octets: 1 EPS status 1 Stream index 1 or 2 Allocation Period 2 Minimum GTS Time Maximum Delay Proposed CTRB Fields Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Appendix 1 Comments and Issues Nov. 12, 2001 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Issue 1: QoS Restrictions to Allocation Nov. 12, 2001 Issue 1: QoS Restrictions to Allocation This is ISOC slot specification. A request for a fixed offset from the beacon for low power devices, etc., will require different additional parameters to indicate that the time slot position is guaranteed with respect to the beacon. If a QoS request defined both the a fixed delay from the beacon and a fixed rate, it would set the beacon period. Should this “super QoS” mode be allowed? Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

July 9, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r0 Nov. 12, 2001 TMAD and the Beacon If TMAD > TBCN + TGTS then the beacon will never interfere with the allocation of time slots If TMAD is smaller than this interval, then the following slides apply. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Issue 2: Beacon & CAP Delays Nov. 12, 2001 Issue 2: Beacon & CAP Delays Any PNC QoS strategy must take into account accommodating the beacon/CAP. The occurrence of the beacon plus the CAP could delay some or all of a member’s ISOC time slots beyond the requested interval, TAP. The PNC must be able guarantee a limit to the size of the beacon and the CAP or QoS policies will breakdown. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

The Beacon May Upset the timing of ISOC Slots Nov. 12, 2001 The Beacon May Upset the timing of ISOC Slots TAP TMAD Delayed Interval Alternative 1 Start of TAP Beacon Alternative 2 Start of TAP Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

TAP Adjustment to Beacon Delay Nov. 12, 2001 TAP Adjustment to Beacon Delay How should the TAP be adjusted if the beacon forces the slot allocation to be late. Should the next allocation be early according to the current TAP interval (Alternative 1), or should it be late and sync off the most recent slot allocation (blue) (Alternative 2)? The user could specify which alternative to use if we defined the QoS parameter switch. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Appendix 2 Data Rate Driven QoS Nov. 12, 2001 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Requirements for Data Rate Only QoS Nov. 12, 2001 Requirements for Data Rate Only QoS The transmit buffer is large enough to accept GTS slots anywhere in the superframe. The amount of bandwidth only depends on the data rate required fd, the data rate available, and the amount of overhead. TGTS / TAP = ( fd / fs )( NT / NENMPDU ) Define TMAD = 0xFFFF, which will be a special value indicating “anywhere in CFP”. Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.