SEM evaluation and rules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
Advertisements

SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
General Structural Equations Week 2 #5 Different forms of constraints Introduction for models estimated in multiple groups.
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview P. Paxton.
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
SOC 681 James G. Anderson, PhD
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II April 5, 2011.
Rules for means Rule 1: If X is a random variable and a and b are fixed numbers, then Rule 2: If X and Y are random variables, then.
Structural Equation Modeling
G Lecture 51 Estimation details Testing Fit Fit indices Arguing for models.
LECTURE 16 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING.
Stages in Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory factor analysis
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
SEM Analysis SPSS/AMOS
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
VI. Evaluate Model Fit Basic questions that modelers must address are: How well does the model fit the data? Do changes to a model, such as reparameterization,
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
1 General Structural Equations (LISREL) Week 1 #4.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
BUSI 6480 Lecture 8 Repeated Measures.
Assessing Hypothesis Testing Fit Indices
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny January 25, Background Introduction to Measures of Fit.
Reserve Variability – Session II: Who Is Doing What? Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Society Spring Meeting San Juan, Puerto Rico.
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
Multiple Regression. Simple Regression in detail Y i = β o + β 1 x i + ε i Where Y => Dependent variable X => Independent variable β o => Model parameter.
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire Design and Testing.
Assessing Hypothesis Testing Fit Indices Kline Chapter 8 (Stop at 210) Byrne page
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Advanced statistics for master students Loglinear models II The best model selection and models for ordinal variables.
SEM Model Fit: Introduction David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
How Good is a Model? How much information does AIC give us? –Model 1: 3124 –Model 2: 2932 –Model 3: 2968 –Model 4: 3204 –Model 5: 5436.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009.
Examples. Path Model 1 Simple mediation model. Much of the influence of Family Background (SES) is indirect.
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire.
The SweSAT Vocabulary (word): understanding of words and concepts. Data Sufficiency (ds): numerical reasoning ability. Reading Comprehension (read): Swedish.
Linear model. a type of regression analyses statistical method – both the response variable (Y) and the explanatory variable (X) are continuous variables.
CFA: Basics Byrne Chapter 3 Brown Chapter 3 (40-53)
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny.
The simple linear regression model and parameter estimation
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
Statistics in SPSS Lecture 5
The University of Manchester
Structural Equation Modeling using MPlus
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Correlation, Regression & Nested Models
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Special Topics In Scientific Computing
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
The University of Manchester
Writing about Structural Equation Models
Intro to SEM P. Soukup.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
SOC 681 – Causal Models with Directly Observed Variables
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
2.3. Measures of Dispersion (Variation):
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I
SEM: Step by Step In AMOS and Mplus.
Presentation transcript:

SEM evaluation and rules Petr Soukup

SEM –model evaluation Overall evaluation - test and criterias Individual parameters – test and CI Find parameters that should be added to model – modification indeces

Overall evaluation of SEM models (model fit) Chi-squaret test Relative criterias AGFI – above 0,9 TLI – above 0,9 CFI - above 0,9 Criteria measuring error RMSEA – values below 0,05 (0,08) are evaluated as good Formulas can be found at : http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

Other evaluation tools (model fit) Ratio Χ2 and df – max 2-3(4) Information criterias: Combine likelihood and complexity of model (df) Mostly AIC or BIC AIC = Χ2 + k(k - 1) - 2df

Evaluatrion continued Reco for BIC Difference above 10 – better model with smaller BIC More: Raftery, A.E. (1995), Bayesian model selection in social research. In P.V.Marsden (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1995. Oxford: Blackwell Discussion AIC vs. BIC: http://emdbolker.wikidot.com/forum/t-81139/

Evaluation of parameters Ratio of parameter and std error Possibility to compute CI – How?

Modification indeces For every possible added parameter Diff in chi-square if parameter would be included Reco nr.1 – index above 4, from statistical point of view it is good to add parameter Reco nr. 2 – Add only one parameter in one step and may be use higher level than 4!

Six rules for model building (viz SEM_6_rules.pdf) Rule 1. Variances for exogenous variables are estimated quantities (esp. latent variables in CFA and residuals/random errors) Note: For every end. var you need random error Rule 2. Covariancs of exo vars are estimated quantities (if theory does not expect opposite)

Six rules for model building (viz SEM_6_rules.pdf) Rule 3. All possible factor weights in CFAs are estimated (if theory does not expect opposite) Note: For 2 (3,4..) factor CFAs it ios common that only some items are linked to 1st, nd (3rd, th,..) factor Rule 4. Regression coefficients between latent or manifest vars are estimated (if theory does not expect opposite)

Six rules for model building (viz SEM_6_rules.pdf) Rule 5. Variances and covariances between endo vars and covariances between exo and ndo vars are never estimated (no exception!!!) Rule 6. For every latent var we need to set scale. Reason: no scale for latent var. Two options: fix variance (typical at 1), or fix relationship to one manifest var (typical at 1). Second option is default in AMOS (and other packages)

Simple example Apply rules 1-6 2 factor CFA How many pars? Which rules are applied?